| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 06/24/2004 1:11:15 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Thread 11 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1159172/posts?page=1 |
Posted on 06/10/2004 2:28:29 PM PDT by JustPiper
If, in fact- we are being threatened by WMD strikes from AQ ships- plus endless sabotage- bio/chem/etc- within the US-
Add to this Iran:
"locating and spying on 29 sensitive sites in the West, with the aim of bombing them…
Our intention is that 6,000 U.S. nuclear warheads will explode in [the U.S.].
We have located the [29] weak points and we have transferred the information about them to the guerilla organizations, and we are acting through them."
Abasi added, "We have established a department for Britain as well, and the discussion about bringing about its collapse is on our agenda. We are also operating among the Mexicans, the Argentineans, and all those with a problem with the U.S."
I guess we have no choice but to act- and act with haste.
Launching a missle from a couple hundred miles out from a ship would be easy to do.Even 50 miles out, they have access to those rockets via Syria, NK and Iran. We have a very long coast line.
"Sometimes these things need to be said and you said it very well. Worth more than two cents in my opinion."
I found a few gold nuggets in NothingMan's post and I agree with them.
Thank you and God bless you, NothingMan.
The person with the information- who made the post- is Sean Osborne Lomax. His site is homelandsecurityUS.com. I just placed his post here on TM. He used to post here months ago.
Re- AQ ships- most of what I read said there could be 30. Some reports say 15. Jill St. Claire has detailed information from the forums.
on.2004/06/14 23:00:04.0 31.1N 80.9W Mw6.1 A ALFM OFF
http://www.emsc-csem.org/cgi-bin/ALERT_datafile.sh?X7234&ALFM
check it out for yourself. . .apology accepted. . .
Sorry, I thought you had this information.
So, this guy must be with Homeland Security Dept, I gather from the site's name.
But are the missles sophisticated enough to hit the target from 50 miles out? Of course, when you're dealing with nukes, close is good enough.
Lots of maritime information here:
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5069435/
Even more if you follow the links in the article.
As highly populated the eastcoast is, any WMD would create great havoc, matter of fact any missle reaching ourhomeland would cause great havoc on the massess.
Not so fast, unevaluated reports don't cut it, evaluated does. Not posted here:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsUS/
Nor is it posted on the website home of the report you reference
http://www.emsc-csem.org/
Nor here
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/current/west_hem.html
Iran Sends Confusing Signals in Tit for Tat Marine Actions
http://www.oneworld.net/article/view/88399/1/
Go fishin, you'll find it. . .
No- I don't think he is. His site is homelandsecurityUS.com but it's not a government site.
The point that you are clearly missing is that a formated data 'report' has not made it onto any of the three posted maps that I submitted to you, including http://www.emsc-csem.org/. A 6.1 would not be easily overlooked by news services and the effects would be obvious.... unless the computer calculated the the data incorrectly which by the way happens, see the recent 5.3 off San Diego quake with a 'phantom' 4.2 reported north of LA. Thats why people evaluate the data as to whether it is valid or not. Good grief.
Very interesting- thanks!
That is exactly my point. See post 1437
oh yeah. . .AND LIGHTEN UP. . .
That's what my husband says too, about the homeless.
The whole thing just struck me as odd mainly because when I think of the bridges here, I think concrete. Seeing a seemingly concrete bridge smoking is just weird.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.