"I disagree. Reliving the Reagan Revolution (or as WSJ said, more like a Restoration) is a good thing for the American public to do right now -- Ron would have approved, I think. The Great Communicator knew the importance of getting your message out. He was so good at portraying the best of America. Let the people hear and understand: THIS is what we're fighting for. Not oil, not conquest, but to be that 'city on the hill' -- that beacon of freedom, that helps those who want to help themselvles."
I don't think you and I are in disagreement, for the most part. My point is that the Democrats will do as they have done since Impeachment, make wildeye'd statements that verge on insanity (Kennedy, Pelosi, Byrd, Hollings, Waters specifically) and further the ongoing alienation of voters.
There is no doubt the effect of Ronald Reagan....my concern however is with the November election, which will give us the man that picks the next four or five Supreme Court Justices, determines how we conduct the next stage of the war on terror, and will decide if we continue to grow the economy, or burden it with new taxes.
My view is the democrats will release the "hounds" concerning Ronald Reagan beginning full force on the Sunday talk shows, and thats where Bush might benefit politically.
Nancy Reagan will fight to protect that legacy until her last breath, bring it on dems, we'll see who wins that conversation.LOL!