Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Controversial 'Stepford Wives' Ad Shows Hillary, Condoleezza
local6.com (Kansas City) ^ | June 8, 2004 | local6.com

Posted on 06/08/2004 9:29:56 AM PDT by Exigence

KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- Some people are saying the way Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice are portrayed in an ad for the new "Stepford Wives" film is distasteful, even outrageous.

'Stepford Wives' Ad Shows Hillary, Condoleezza In Strange Light

The spot shows an image of Rice made to look nude from the waist up, and a picture of Clinton that morphs into what looks like a cookie-baking Stepford wife.

The pictures move across the screen very quickly, but they caught the eye of a Kansas City woman, who recorded the spot to make sure of what she was seeing.

Becky Reynolds said when she taped and watched the ad again, she "realized it was even worse" that what she'd suspected.

"It's just inappropriate, and it needs to be stopped," Reynolds said.

For those who haven't seen the 1975 thriller by director Bryan Forbes, the 2004 version is pretty much the same, but with a dash of technical wizardry. Both films are based on a book by Ira Levin about a small Connecticut town where the women act too perfectly -- because their husbands have replaced them with robots.

But Reynolds says the less-than-perfect images in the advertisement for the new film will keep her out of the theater. Pat Gray, who works with Northstar Marketing Group, said the ad shows bad taste toward Rice and Clinton.

"In today's media environment, I don't know whether it's unacceptable morally or not -- distasteful, for sure," Gray said. "If I were them, I'd probably sue."

Gray also said the ad wouldn't drive him to the theater.

"That certainly wouldn't stimulate me to go see the movie," he said.

Nancy Kirkpatrick, a spokeswoman for Paramount Pictures, said the film studio hasn't received any complaints about the spot. Paramount hasn't heard from Rice or Clinton, either.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: clinton; condoleezza; hillary; stepford
There's also a survey, a photo, and a link to the film clip on the site. I think the depiction of Condoleezza is particularly egregious.
1 posted on 06/08/2004 9:29:57 AM PDT by Exigence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Exigence

At least the "roles" weren't reversed.


2 posted on 06/08/2004 9:34:10 AM PDT by anonymous_user (Am I passive aggressive? Ask me tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exigence

3 posted on 06/08/2004 9:34:19 AM PDT by EggsAckley (............"The democrats would rather win the WH than the war." - Tom DeLay............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exigence

Hillary "Lucrezia" Clinton baking cookies? Yeah, that's a pretty good basis for a horror movie all right...


4 posted on 06/08/2004 9:34:48 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exigence

I agree. Dr. Rice has done nothing except do a great job. I'd rather they show billyblythe-clinton as a Stepford Wife. THAT might be funny.


5 posted on 06/08/2004 9:35:16 AM PDT by bannie (Liberal Media: The Most Dangerous Enemies to America and Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exigence

The story stank. The movie was just awful.

Why are all these producers rehashing old movies, storylines and sequels and not coming up with something new?

Just becaue you have new technology doesn't mean you can take a completely lame story and make it better. If the plot and story stinks...it will stink the second time around.

Trying to generate some audience by insulting Secretary Rice is stupid.


6 posted on 06/08/2004 9:36:50 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Vote Kerry if you want to commit national suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exigence

Hillary is good at baking cookies!


7 posted on 06/08/2004 9:37:18 AM PDT by kalama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exigence
Hmm. This dumba$$ movie is about morphing some hag into a babe. In the video for Rice and Clinton they had to do a "TOTAL MAKEOVER" on Hillary to get her to the "babe" level. All they had to do to Rice is rip her shirt off. Because Rice is already a babe. So nothing changed for Rice but Hillary is all "ew"

So, Hillary is a dried up old hag and Condi is hot babe. Really hot babe! Hot hot hot! Babe-a-licious! Woo hoo! Youza! <-- I mean this in an intellectual and non-sexist way. Really....

8 posted on 06/08/2004 9:43:14 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (I'm isthisnickcool, and I approved this post!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exigence
"a picture of Clinton that morphs into what looks like a cookie-baking Stepford wife. "

AHHHHHHH! These guys have a great sense of true horror!

9 posted on 06/08/2004 9:44:34 AM PDT by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
As I said on the other thread, the only accurate thing about this photoshop gif is that Rice is in as good a shape as the picture makes her out to be. She is a physical specimen. Hillary, otoh, will never look that way again.

(/catty remarks)

Be Seeing You,

Chris

10 posted on 06/08/2004 9:53:12 AM PDT by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "Jesus is Coming. Everybody look busy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR

I haven't seen the movie but I have seen the trailer. You can often tell when a movie is going to be bad, the trailer seems overlong. I had that feeling when I saw that trailer.


11 posted on 06/08/2004 10:59:56 AM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Exigence

I don't think I'd mind so much if I was Condi. At least they make her look attractive, sexy and thin. She seems to have a sense of humor and can spin it to be a positive thing.


12 posted on 06/08/2004 11:04:04 AM PDT by clarissaexplainsitall (stewed tomatoes are just plain gross)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Horror movie? This guy was looking
forward to a steamy romantic film.


13 posted on 06/08/2004 11:21:04 AM PDT by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user

That's the defense they use. Condi maybe nude but at least it wasn't "Hillary".


14 posted on 06/08/2004 1:16:10 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Exigence

Obviously not Hillary...the woman in the ad actually has breasts.


15 posted on 06/08/2004 6:38:03 PM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson