Skip to comments.
News crew in Iraq tipped off about roadside bomb. Did not tell convoy
GoGov.com ^
| June 5, 2004
| Central Command
Posted on 06/05/2004 12:21:58 PM PDT by BJungNan
NEWS CREW IN IRAQ TIPPED OFF TO LOCATION OF ROADSIDE BOMB DID NOT RELAY INFORMATION TO COALITION CONVOY
MOSUL, Iraq - Coalition soldiers questioned two news media cameramen and a reporter after a roadside bomb exploded near a Coalition convoy two kilometers north of Mosul June 3.
The media, who were at the scene prior to the attack, told soldiers at the scene they had received a tip to be at that location prior to the attack and they had witnessed the explosion.
There was minimal damage to a Coalition vehicle, a cracked windshield, and no serious injuries.
3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division soldiers requested the media accompany them to a base camp in Mosul to answer questions as witnesses to the incident. The news media representatives left the base camp in the mid afternoon.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndid; iraq; mosul; slimemedia; tips
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-104 next last
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator
To: bitt
Weren't photographers also given a heads up about those contractors in Iraq that were torched and their charred corpses hung from a bridge?
Was it Mike Wallace or some other American "journalist" who once said he would NOT warn our side of a coming attack?
To: Carolinamom
"Was it Mike Wallace or some other American "journalist" who once said he would NOT warn our side of a coming attack?" Yes, and Peter Jennings agreed with him after a time.
The responses of both Wallace and Jennings to the moderator of "Ethics in America is here:
http://www.usafa.af.mil/jscope/JSCOPE02/Cassella02.html
It's an eye opener...and will disturb any rational American.
Semper Fi
83
posted on
06/05/2004 5:22:14 PM PDT
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek...But I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: BJungNan
84
posted on
06/05/2004 5:28:18 PM PDT
by
dr_who_2
To: xzins; BJungNan; Tallguy; Tamsey; onyx; mollynme; TomGuy; Carolinamom
Here's a link to Annenberg's site for the series, "
Ethics in America". All ten parts are summarized and a link for video on demand is available. The episode, "Politics, Privacy and the Press" is the one you're talking about. They also sell the video in VHS format.
I've never seen this, but it doesn't surprise me that Mike Wallace and Peter Jennings would express this kind of heartless sentiment. I wonder if Mike Wallace's son, Chris, is of an age to have served in Vietnam?
85
posted on
06/05/2004 5:29:04 PM PDT
by
O.C. - Old Cracker
(When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
To: xzins; BJungNan; Tallguy; Tamsey; onyx; mollynme; TomGuy; Carolinamom
My apologies, I was wrong about the episode. According to the footnotes from Kent Cassella's paper on this subject, it is episode seven, "Under Orders, Under Fire (Part II)" where this exchange between Mike Wallace, Peter Jennings and Colonel Connell took place.
The Annenberg site says you can buy individual episodes only if you contact them by phone. I think I will buy this one.
86
posted on
06/05/2004 5:38:26 PM PDT
by
O.C. - Old Cracker
(When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
To: river rat
Good grief! I just read Cassella's paper, and even though I'm not surprised, it is hard to understand how adult, educated and supposedly heterosexual males could live their lives thinking like this. In spite of all their wealth and fame, I wouldn't trade one second of my life with the likes of Jennings or Wallace. No sense of honor or duty. Utterly shameful. Souls to be pitied.
87
posted on
06/05/2004 5:45:05 PM PDT
by
O.C. - Old Cracker
(When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
To: R. Scott
Note to Military in Iraq - if you spot a news crew set up along the road, be very, very careful. Forget the be careful part, just shoot them.
88
posted on
06/05/2004 5:46:08 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: MIchaelTArchangel
They not only acted with reckless disregard for the lives of our soldiers but also allied themselves with the terrorists.On this, you are exactly correct. They picked sides. This is not neutral behavior.
89
posted on
06/05/2004 5:51:09 PM PDT
by
BJungNan
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Thank you for the valuable link.
90
posted on
06/05/2004 6:17:01 PM PDT
by
onyx
To: BJungNan
If it bleeds it leads....cockroaches, all of them!
91
posted on
06/05/2004 6:19:14 PM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(*They are all Pat Tillman's*........Rush)
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
I have an old taped copy someplace in my files.
I used it in a class on battlefield ethics that I taught for my old spec ops helicopter unit. (I was the chaplain)
It was the most amazing exchange I've ever heard by some of the biggie news guys.
Maybe O'Reilly or Hannity & Colmes will run a reprise on it some day.
92
posted on
06/05/2004 6:37:30 PM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: BJungNan
3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division soldiers requested the media accompany them to a base camp in Mosul to answer questions as witnesses to the incident.Witnesses??? They were co-conspirators by keeping their mouths shut!
To: ambrose
After that treachery .. why the heck can't we tell them to pack their bags and take a hike ..?? WHY ..?? This is the most disgusting thing a media person can do .. there is just no excuse for this kind of behavior.
94
posted on
06/05/2004 7:28:32 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Tallguy
This was probably Mike Wallace & Peter Jennings, but who was the 3rd?
Walter Cronkite came out of retirement?
95
posted on
06/06/2004 3:32:53 AM PDT
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: TomGuy
I find that so hard to believe, that Cal Thomas essentially took the same stand that Jennings did--are you sure? Not arguing, just surprised if it's true.
96
posted on
06/06/2004 3:42:10 AM PDT
by
Judith Anne
(HOW ARE WE EVER GOING TO CLEAN UP ALL THIS MESS?)
To: BJungNan
Let me guess, the 'media' was CNN.
97
posted on
06/06/2004 3:44:20 AM PDT
by
tutstar
( <{{--->< http://ripe4change.4-all.org Be part of the solution not part of the problem!)
To: dr_who_2
"They should be arrested."
I disagree. Leave them there and I assure you they will soon become victims of "friendly fire".
To: Judith Anne
I find that so hard to believe, that Cal Thomas essentially took the same stand that Jennings did--are you sure? Not arguing, just surprised if it's true.
Yes, that was about what he said. I was surprised. The next week, he and Neal Gabler made some comments that irritated me, too. I fired off an email criticizing them for their arrogant attitudes. 'Journalists' seem, generally, to be a bunch of arrogant SOB's with an 'we are above the rest of you peons' attitude.
99
posted on
06/06/2004 5:44:13 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: xzins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-104 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson