Posted on 06/04/2004 5:45:45 AM PDT by runningbear
Pinging ....latest online news from Thursday, Friday's reports
Pinging ....latest online news from Thursday, Friday's reports
I'll see if I can cruise by RWC today with a camera to catch all the newsmediahype.
The answer we know already. Her body was found with beige pants and blouse. Scott said she had on black pants when he left on his fishing trip.
So the black pants and/or blouse should have been in the laundry or ready to go to the cleaners OR in the closet.
One lady (I think from the spa) said all the wives complained about their husbands...but not Lacie. Fear and/or shame can do that to you. Experience is the best teacher.
And the "eyewitness(es)" to Laci sightings also said that she had on black pants and white shirt. This is key, and may go to discredit their testimony.
cool..but I think court today is not in session for Peterson trial... resumes Monday...
She had on the waistband and tatters of pants ,same color as last seen in the evening of the 23rd. and a bra..The blouse she wore when last seen at the Salon on the 23rd was photographed first by the police on top of a clothes hamper and then found by Amy,her sister,in a walk through with the police much later "wadded up" in a drawer.. is how I recall it..
I thought you would be interested in this poster's excellent point about MG's reported new assertion that Snotty purchased the boat for Ron. (on yesterday's thread)
To: Rusty Roberts
"IF the boat was for Ron, why was there no mention to anyone else?"
Not only that, but why would you go fishing in someone's "present"?
449 posted on 06/04/2004 6:22:04 AM PDT by gopheraj
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1146763/posts?page=449#449
I'm kind of glad this isn't on tv...I'd probably be glued to it again--and I DON'T want to do that in the summer...thanks for the pings RB!
Thanks for the info.
Over here is today's thread.
RB, another entry for your ping list!
That IS a good point!
Okay, so the second-to-last article you posted says that Distaso displayed a photo of a clothes hamper full of men's clothes, and the hamper also showed that shirt of Laci's hanging out of it. That is, the shirt Amy saw her in the evening of the 23rd.
Then, Amy testified that she found that same shirt "wadded up in a dresser drawer" in the bedroom. Amy found it that way during that Feb. search where the police asked her to come in the house--the search from which Amy emerged crying.
And the article criticizes Distaso for not "explaining" this seeming discrepancy. I wonder how he's supposed to explain it, when he is not in the argument stage of the trial? What he needs to do is keep a note of the discrepancy, then offer his own explanation of it when the time finally comes for closing arguments.
My own idea of how the shirt changed from hanging out of the clothes hamper to wadded up in the dresser drawer is: I think that picture of the hamper was maybe taken during the earlier time or times that the police were in the Peterson house. Then, sometime before the last police search in February, SOMEONE (presumably Scott) took that blouse from the hamper and stuffed it in the drawer.
Ping
Good Morning everyone.
No trial on Fridays.
Not a clue...RG do you know if or when???
Distaso told the judge "I'll get to that later."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.