Okay, so the second-to-last article you posted says that Distaso displayed a photo of a clothes hamper full of men's clothes, and the hamper also showed that shirt of Laci's hanging out of it. That is, the shirt Amy saw her in the evening of the 23rd.
Then, Amy testified that she found that same shirt "wadded up in a dresser drawer" in the bedroom. Amy found it that way during that Feb. search where the police asked her to come in the house--the search from which Amy emerged crying.
And the article criticizes Distaso for not "explaining" this seeming discrepancy. I wonder how he's supposed to explain it, when he is not in the argument stage of the trial? What he needs to do is keep a note of the discrepancy, then offer his own explanation of it when the time finally comes for closing arguments.
My own idea of how the shirt changed from hanging out of the clothes hamper to wadded up in the dresser drawer is: I think that picture of the hamper was maybe taken during the earlier time or times that the police were in the Peterson house. Then, sometime before the last police search in February, SOMEONE (presumably Scott) took that blouse from the hamper and stuffed it in the drawer.
Distaso told the judge "I'll get to that later."
logical... Yeah, Geragos does give people a run for the money to sharpen skills and become better than he..... ;o)