Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airport accused of ejecting woman with anti-war poster (Carole Ward)
HoustonChronicle.com ^ | June 3, 2004, 6:54AM | Associated Press

Posted on 06/03/2004 6:14:21 AM PDT by Max Combined

DALLAS - A 57-year-old woman says she was ejected from a terminal at the Dallas-Fort Worth International airport after showing military recruits an anti-war campaign poster.

Carole Ward showed the recruits an 8 1/2-by-11 inch poster of a composite illustration of President Bush made up of the faces of soldiers who have died in Iraq. It bore the title "Faces of Death."

Some people found the poster offensive and the woman became belligerent with an American Airlines gate agent, according to Tim Wagner, a spokesman for the airline.

He also said Ward made some passengers feel uncomfortable while waiting to board her plane during a thunderstorm Tuesday night and presented a security threat.

"She's not only going around talking to these recruits, saying they shouldn't join the Army, they shouldn't fight in the war, she's also forcing the poster on them," Wagner told The Dallas Morning News in today's online edition.

Ward, who was returning home to Albuquerque, N.M., from a Libertarian convention in Atlanta, said she started a conversation with a few of several dozen recruits in the airport.

She passed around the poster, that had messages to elect Libertarian Aaron Russo president and to stop a possible military draft.

According to Wagner, some people thought the poster had pictures of soldiers' bodies and said the material definitely could be "considered offensive."

Although Wagner said the gate agent asked airport police to remove the woman from the secure side of the terminal, airport spokesman Ken Capps said that the officers only monitored the situation and Ward left on her own.

She says she was forced to leave the hotel without her bag and spend the night in a hotel.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: aaronrusso; caroleward; carolward; dfw; issheblue; libertarianparty; lp; peaceniks; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-230 next last
To: csvset
...without her bag..
Her luggage or her stash?

Could be her significant other.

41 posted on 06/03/2004 7:13:40 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (In God We Trust. All Others We Monitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

No one is supressing "dissenting views." Just turn on the TV news for three minutes and you'll get all the "dissenting views" you like.

"Dissenting views" are dissemenated by every media means available to as many people as possible.

Claiming that there are not enough "dissenting views" is like saying there are not enough stars in the sky.


42 posted on 06/03/2004 7:18:12 AM PDT by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

"If the shirt fits...."

It doesn't fit. And it's not even a shirt.


43 posted on 06/03/2004 7:19:04 AM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

not brown shirts but a closet full of tie-dyed t-shirs. Most likely with a marajuana leaf in the middle.


44 posted on 06/03/2004 7:22:59 AM PDT by LauraJean (Fukai please pass the squid sauce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

If that hag pulled that act on
me, while I was a captive of
waiting for a flight at the
airport, the officials there
would have to choose: "suppress"
HER views or "suppress" mine.

I would be controlled, but I would
get in her face.

She had no right that superceded
the rights of her harass-ees


45 posted on 06/03/2004 7:25:52 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

"For the record, the brown shirt thing is old."

"For the record, supression of dissenting views was their stock and trade. If the shirt fits...."

Right, the recruits have a right to risk their lives for what they believe in and the citizen has the right to have her fat butt kicked out of the terminal for what she believes in.


46 posted on 06/03/2004 7:28:02 AM PDT by TET1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

she is lucky she didnt get her ass kicked


47 posted on 06/03/2004 7:30:27 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
"Bowling for Vegetables" and "Wheel of Fish"

ROFL!!

There was more than a phonebooth's worth there.
Maybe a VW bug's-worth...

48 posted on 06/03/2004 7:31:04 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Rush may be "show prep for the media", but FR is show prep for RUSH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
first they shut down "bowling for vegetables," and i did not twitch a whisker. then they came for "wheel of fish," the dirty corporate fascists.

-- dighton's cat.

49 posted on 06/03/2004 7:31:04 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dighton; aculeus; general_re; BlueLancer; Poohbah; hellinahandcart; rdb3
Russo speaking:

See what our government is doing:

1. Both political parties lie to us, and neither can be trusted. 2. Our economy is a disaster. 3. We're losing our right to free speech. 4. Both parties passed the Patriot Act, a crime against all Americans. 5. Both wage war against medical marijuana and alternative medicine. 6. Both attack our right to bear arms. 7. Both parties overtax, overspend, and over-regulate. 8. Where is the gold owned by the American people? 9. ...

Why inject a question into a list of declarative sentences?

50 posted on 06/03/2004 7:32:10 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
No one is supressing "dissenting views." Just turn on the TV news for three minutes and you'll get all the "dissenting views" you like.

Context. If you drop context the statement no longer applies. Look at the comment I responded to.

51 posted on 06/03/2004 7:32:13 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3

You might have a case if she wasn't allowed to express her opinion anywhere. Suggesting that removing a disruptive individual from an airport who is harassing other travelers doesn't even remotely qualify.

Try again.


52 posted on 06/03/2004 7:32:27 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Ward, who was returning home to Albuquerque, N.M., from a Libertarian convention in Atlanta . . .

Why my state? Why? Why?

53 posted on 06/03/2004 7:35:28 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (John Kerry - Not the Swiftest Boat in the Delta.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
The context, as I read it, is that "brown shirts" are suppressing "dissenting views."

But:

1. There are no brown shirts
2. No dissenting views are being suppressed.

54 posted on 06/03/2004 7:37:06 AM PDT by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
If it wasn't an intentional stunt then she should be evaluated mentally to make sure she's not a danger to herself or others.


"Hey, that was my idea!"

55 posted on 06/03/2004 7:38:00 AM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Skooz

I am going to use my freedom of speach today and call this lady. I will inform her that I will be posting this story with her home address in every female military barracks in new mexico. It is my right, as an american


56 posted on 06/03/2004 7:39:01 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mulder

Are you a professional dumbass or just an amateur?


57 posted on 06/03/2004 7:40:29 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies: foreign and domestic RATmedia agree Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
Why my state? Why? Why?

'Cuz it would hardly be fair if my state had all of 'em.

;-)

58 posted on 06/03/2004 7:40:42 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: Skooz
The context, as I read it,

The context was YOUR comment that I quoted and responded to.

No dissenting views are being suppressed.

I was talking specifically to YOU, and specifically addressing YOUR comment, "Now shut up and quit whining."

That's an SA mindset if I ever saw one. Here's a Jeffersonian mindset, and one more fitting a free republic, "Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it."

I'd rather people focus on combating her comments with reason instead of trying to shut her up.

60 posted on 06/03/2004 7:46:28 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson