Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/01/2004 1:36:55 PM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Grampa Dave; Eurotwit; knighthawk; Sabertooth; Shermy; FITZ; dennisw; Trinity_Tx

Ping


2 posted on 06/01/2004 1:44:05 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

We should have gotten serious about icing the likes of Abu Nidal, et al., long before 9/11. We might have saved ourselves grief in the long run.


3 posted on 06/01/2004 1:44:30 PM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Sheesh...it requires log-in. Do they discuss this guy:

Abdul Rahman Yasin, a U.S. citizen who moved to Iraq in the 1960's and returned to the U.S. in 1992. After the 1993 WTC bombing, Yasin fled to Iraq and was given monthly salary and housing by Saddam Hussein's regime.

Or these facts:

Ramzi Yousef (1993 WTC) and Terry Nichols (OKC) crossed paths in the Phillipines. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (9/11) was Yousef's uncle. It is interesting to note that Yousef entered the United States on an Iraqi passport and had been known among the New York fundamentalists as "Rashid, the Iraqi".

9/11 was not the beginning of Saddam's complicity in terror attacks on the U.S.

Other links

4 posted on 06/01/2004 1:55:57 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

There's another good article from the Weekly Standard (via Frontpage) about these very connections...including those the media made pre-Bush.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/readarticle.asp?ID=13589

It is amazing to watch the big media chastize and redicule Foxnews viewers for accepting a Saddam/terrorist connection, when they were involved with making these very connections only a few short years ago. This doesn't just reveal a bias...it's an intentional and coordinated effort to distort the truth and mislead the American public simply to advance their liberal agenda and candidates...at the expense of our nation's security.

-snip

"Newsweek magazine ran an article in its January 11, 1999, issue headed "Saddam + Bin Laden?" "Here's what is known so far," it read:

"Saddam Hussein, who has a long record of supporting terrorism, is trying to rebuild his intelligence network overseas--assets that would allow him to establish a terrorism network. U.S. sources say he is reaching out to Islamic terrorists, including some who may be linked to Osama bin Laden, the wealthy Saudi exile accused of masterminding the bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa last summer."

Four days later, on January 15, 1999, ABC News reported that three intelligence agencies believed that Saddam had offered asylum to bin Laden:

"Intelligence sources say bin Laden's long relationship with the Iraqis began as he helped Sudan's fundamentalist government in their efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction. --ABC News has learned that in December, an Iraqi intelligence chief named Faruq Hijazi, now Iraq's ambassador to Turkey, made a secret trip to Afghanistan to meet with bin Laden. Three intelligence agencies tell ABC News they cannot be certain what was discussed, but almost certainly, they say, bin Laden has been told he would be welcome in Baghdad."

NPR reporter Mike Shuster interviewed Vincent Cannistraro, former head of the CIA's counterterrorism center, and offered this report: "Iraq's contacts with bin Laden go back some years, to at least 1994, when, according to one U.S. government source, Hijazi met him when bin Laden lived in Sudan." According to Cannistraro, Iraq invited bin Laden to live in Baghdad to be nearer to potential targets of terrorist attack in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait...

"By mid-February 1999, journalists did not even feel the need to qualify these claims of an Iraq-al Qaeda relationship. An Associated Press dispatch that ran in the Washington Post ended this way:

"The Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has offered asylum to bin Laden, who openly supports Iraq against Western powers." Where did journalists get the idea that Saddam and bin Laden might be coordinating efforts? Among other places, from high-ranking Clinton administration officials.

In the spring of 1998--well before the U.S. embassy bombings in East Africa--the Clinton administration indicted Osama bin Laden. The indictment, unsealed a few months later, prominently cited al Qaeda's agreement to collaborate with Iraq on weapons of mass destruction.

The Clinton Justice Department had been concerned about negative public reaction to its potentially capturing bin Laden without "a vehicle for extradition," official paperwork charging him with a crime. It was "not an afterthought" to include the al Qaeda-Iraq connection in the indictment, says an official familiar with the deliberations. "It couldn't have gotten into the indictment unless someone was willing to testify to it under oath."

The Clinton administration's indictment read unequivocally: "Al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq."


5 posted on 06/01/2004 1:59:22 PM PDT by cwb (Liberals: Always fighting for social justice in all the wrong places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Add to this list:

One of the 1993 WTC bombers fled to Iraq after the bombing. Check out Iraq's newspaper story, (newspaper under control of Saddam's son), and tell me this guy didn't know 9/11 was coming. Find it on Newsmax.


6 posted on 06/01/2004 2:00:04 PM PDT by milford421
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Abu Nidal was an agent double, he was working for the Israeli intelligence agency for years .


7 posted on 06/01/2004 2:27:24 PM PDT by Perceval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

less than two months before 9/11/01, the state-controlled Iraqi newspaper “Al-Nasiriya” carried a column headlined, “American, an Obsession called Osama Bin Ladin.” (July 21, 2001)

In the piece, Baath Party writer Naeem Abd Muhalhal predicted that bin Laden would attack the US “with the seriousness of the Bedouin of the desert about the way he will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House.”

The same state-approved column also insisted that bin Laden “will strike America on the arm that is already hurting,” and that the US “will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra every time he hears his songs” – an apparent reference to the Sinatra classic, “New York, New York”.

That and a host of other links here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1127451/posts


9 posted on 06/01/2004 2:53:21 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

12 posted on 06/01/2004 4:21:14 PM PDT by wolicy_ponk (George W. Bush - LET'S ROLL! --------------------- John F. Kerry - Let's Roll over...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Of course you do realize that this article is totally useless when posted as a brief excerpt?

Nobody outside of Florida is going to go through that paper's involved registration process for a single article, and it is not the registration where someone could use a universal name and password.


19 posted on 06/02/2004 10:17:49 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

22 posted on 06/03/2004 4:02:29 PM PDT by wolicy_ponk (George W. Bush - LET'S ROLL! --------------------- John F. Kerry - Let's Roll over...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson