Skip to comments.
Targeting Rush
The Washington Times' Inside Politics ^
| 31 May 04
| Greg Pierce
Posted on 05/31/2004 6:24:05 AM PDT by Alissa
Edited on 07/12/2004 4:15:40 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
05/31/2004 6:24:05 AM PDT
by
Alissa
To: Alissa
Poor girl has his panties in a wad over Rush Limbaugh.
He should go to Massachussets, get married, and settle down already.
2
posted on
05/31/2004 6:27:11 AM PDT
by
Rome2000
(Foreign leaders for Kerry!!!!!)
To: Alissa
The sanctimonius handwringing is getting old. Mr. Brock, if you're so concerned about morality why not speak to things more serious. Meanwhile, we'll fashion a RUSH/CHENEY 2004 bumper sticker just for you.
To: Alissa
Perhaps Ms Brock wouldn't have gotten in such a tizzy if Rush would have compared the abuse at Abu Ghraib with a David Brock cocktail party (no pun intended?) instead of with a college hazing prank.
4
posted on
05/31/2004 6:34:42 AM PDT
by
MCRD
To: Alissa
The green line represents the Websearch traffic rankings for RushLimbaugh.com. The red line represents mediamatters.org. Who is winning?
5
posted on
05/31/2004 6:37:18 AM PDT
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Third parties serve only to kill what they claim to promote and promote what they claim to oppose.)
To: Alissa
Perhaps he could suggest that Michael Moore remain in Cannes.
6
posted on
05/31/2004 6:37:46 AM PDT
by
mware
To: Alissa
The reference to hazing is totally out of context, considering the three-hour show that Rush devoted to this. Rush said that it was abhorrent and unacceptable but that it was done, so move on.
Rush also nailed the 'Rats and the media for their true motivation with this story, to hurt the President--even if it demoralizes our military and encourages our enemies. So Rush did slip in a joke about the incident resembling a Skull & Bones initiation, which at least puts it in some context and infuriates the Democrats.
7
posted on
05/31/2004 6:44:36 AM PDT
by
DJtex
To: Alissa
Former right-wing operative David Brock Quite a title for a guy who wrote a few unrefuted stories about Bill Clinton a long time ago! (And this was in the Washington Times?)
ML/NJ
8
posted on
05/31/2004 6:46:37 AM PDT
by
ml/nj
To: Rome2000
He should go to Massachussets, get married, and settle down already. And have a baby, too. Although most queers are too vain for stretch marks.
9
posted on
05/31/2004 7:01:45 AM PDT
by
Agnes Heep
(Solus cum sola non cogitabuntur orare pater noster)
To: WinOne4TheGipper
The green line represents the Websearch traffic rankings for RushLimbaugh.com. The red line represents mediamatters.org. Who is winning? I had to look at that a couple times, but if that scale is right, with 100 on top and increasing as you go toward the bottom of the chart, then it would seem mediamatters.org is winning. Can someone explain that scale cuz I know that can't be the case.
Jag
To: Alissa
11
posted on
05/31/2004 7:06:26 AM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(Current dream bike: Kawasaki Vulcan Nomad 1500)
To: Alissa
David Brock's brain is fried from his gayness. Wonder who put up the money for this org......Soros?? A.N.S.W.E.R.??
12
posted on
05/31/2004 7:06:47 AM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Alissa
Rush really is poison for our troops...now, if only they could hear a voice of reason like Al Franken or maybe Randi Rhodes...
Hmmm why would our troops want to hear the most popular nationaly-syndicated radio personality of all time praddle on about being a proud American and supporter of the troops?
We don't want to ENCOURAGE those over-grown frat boys into killing more babies, do we????
:-p
13
posted on
05/31/2004 7:07:24 AM PDT
by
Jinjelsnaps
("Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana" - Groucho Marx)
To: Alissa
To: Alissa
Brock, now president of Media Matters for America, a group formed to combat the influence of conservative media outlets, says that the government shouldn't be sponsoring what Limbaugh is peddling.
Yet, it would seem he has no problem with "Public Radio" being government sponsored. Some double standard!
15
posted on
05/31/2004 7:12:32 AM PDT
by
onevoter
To: WinOne4TheGipper
And that's a logarithmic scale too.
To: Alissa
I have several friends with whom I served that went to Boat School. One Annapolis graduate told me that the hazing he took as a plebe was worse than any of the "torture" done at Abu Grahaib.
The public is already sick and tired of this story. Only the New York Fishwrap is staying with it for its inbred audience of "Deliverance"-type liberal morons.
To: Alissa
"Brock, ....says that the government shouldn't be sponsoring...Rush"but I am sure he is completely supportive of the government sponsorship of the balanced, responsible, 'nere do wrong actions of NPR.....
18
posted on
05/31/2004 7:15:49 AM PDT
by
DKM
To: Alissa
"Brock, now president of Media Matters for America, a group formed to combat the influence of conservative media outlets, says that the government shouldn't be sponsoring what Limbaugh is peddling. The last I heard Rush and the EIB were free market driven.
Perhaps David meant NPR?
19
posted on
05/31/2004 7:21:31 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Fly your flag proudly Monday in memory of the true patriots who have given their all)
To: Ann Archy
Wonder who put up the money for this org......Soros?? A.N.S.W.E.R.??If it is ANSWER then it is probably still Soros, or maybe it's ketchup money.
20
posted on
05/31/2004 7:31:19 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
