Skip to comments.
So, what is a 'neocon'?
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^
| Saturday, May 29, 2004
| Bill Steigerwald
Posted on 05/30/2004 11:02:40 AM PDT by Willie Green
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
To: Willie Green
NeoCons: those who aspire to achieve socialism via the Republican party?
2
posted on
05/30/2004 11:04:41 AM PDT
by
Abcdefg
To: Abcdefg
NeoCons: those that think that we can win the war on terror by leaving our borders unsecured.
3
posted on
05/30/2004 11:05:38 AM PDT
by
inflation
(Cuba = BAD, China = Good? Why, should not both be treated the way Cuba is?)
To: Willie Green
I saw the term "mesoconservative" the other day.
I am expecting anyday soon Jerassicon, Futuracon and Retrocon and Condacon.
4
posted on
05/30/2004 11:06:22 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(This is a tag: </> This is a Line ---------)
To: Willie Green
A derogatory term usually used by liberals an RINO's to attack anyone who supports President Bush.
To: Willie Green
Thanks for posting the article. It is clear from the discussion involving prominent Conservatives (as in your article) that no one quite agrees,
6
posted on
05/30/2004 11:08:43 AM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(Must get moose and squirrel ... B. Badanov)
To: Willie Green; Carry_Okie; forester; sasquatch; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; hedgetrimmer; knews_hound; ...
7
posted on
05/30/2004 11:10:35 AM PDT
by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: Abcdefg
All the attention on the Neocons allows the Paleoconservatives to kick butt. Gotta have a smokescreen, ya know. ;-)
8
posted on
05/30/2004 11:11:14 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Communism failed because people like to own stuff.)
To: BunnySlippers
The difference in the presidential candidates this election are so stark that a vote for Kerry is an admission of a sick mind or a treasonous heart.
9
posted on
05/30/2004 11:11:50 AM PDT
by
Abcdefg
To: COEXERJ145
I usually call them "neo-Libs" right back. Tends to cause confusion and anger.
10
posted on
05/30/2004 11:12:22 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(hoplophobia is a mental aberration rather than a mere attitude)
To: inflation
NeoCons: those that think that we can win the war on terror by leaving our borders unsecured.Neocons: How dare you think we need secure national borders? All we need is to hire countless more rude illegals to do security checks at our airports.
11
posted on
05/30/2004 11:14:34 AM PDT
by
xJones
To: freedumb2003
Guess that makes me an Ultraretrocon.
12
posted on
05/30/2004 11:16:24 AM PDT
by
Delta 21
(MKC USCG -ret)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: freedumb2003
I like 'retrocon' myself.
14
posted on
05/30/2004 11:18:25 AM PDT
by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
To: HitmanNY
Now that you mention it, Retrocon is pretty good.
I better copyright it before The Donald gets there!!
15
posted on
05/30/2004 11:20:37 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(This is a tag: </> This is a Line ---------)
To: Willie Green
I read the article pretty fast, but can't figure out the Anti-Semitic part?
Can some one explain what they were talking about?
To: Willie Green
George Will: It's not necessarily anti-Semitic. There is often an anti-Semitic twist to it, yes. I think George Will's response was the closest to accurate.
To: farmfriend
18
posted on
05/30/2004 11:29:10 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: xJones
Neocons: How dare you think we need secure national borders? I was told the bad guys would never enter through our bleeding borders. They would only enter legally on jet planes, as tourist or visitors on visas etc.
I guess we didn't learn much after the morning of 911.
19
posted on
05/30/2004 11:30:53 AM PDT
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: Willie Green
Rich Lowry: ... And with the war on terror, you saw neoconservatives emerging as a distinct tendency within conservatism, mostly on foreign policy; its hallmarks being extreme interventionism, extremely idealistic foreign policy, and emphasis on democracy building and spreading human rights and freedom and an overestimation, in my view, of how easy it is to spread democracy and liberty to spots in the world where it doesn't exist currently. True enough, and well said. Lowry's National Review led the way on this. A little more skepticism and openness to opposing opinions would have been advisable. Maybe they wanted to get out far ahead and give clear indications of the way for others to follow, lest they be left behind and lose their influence or the country miss the big opportunity to change the world.
It would be surprising if some of the big war pundits (Hanson, Peters, Price-Jones, Steyn) will have as much influence in the future as they had over the last two years or so. National Review will probably do some backpedaling to disassociate itself from the more determined and impassioned neocons, but they've lost some credibility in recent months.
20
posted on
05/30/2004 11:31:32 AM PDT
by
x
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson