SADDAM's ROLE IN 911

multiple sources (as noted and listed) | 05/29/04 | Sam Pender

[Happy2BMe]

Thanks for the OKC ping!

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[justshutupandtakeit]

Print for later study bump. Thanks.

[ladyinred]

well, let's just say that if Saddam's in 911 is explained to the American people and to the world, then Cheny, Powell, and President Bush's father would be liable for 911 as they didn't remove Saddam when they had the chance. Definately not something they want proven wrong about!

Can you imagine the outrage of the leftist's had 41 gone after Saddam then? He has no UN mandate doncha know!

Otherwise, bookmarked and grateful for all of this!

[ladyinred]

He is for security over democracy. Aren't all communists?

Indeed, however, we would never be secure if we don't continue this war on terror. My God, when will people understand in this nation of brain dead reality tv shows that if we don't fight them there, we will fight them HERE?

[MeekOneGOP]

The 4th Infantry undertook Operation Red Dawn to find Saddam.
They are based in Texas - Fort Hood.

They got their man - captured Saddam. "Don't mess with Texas!":

[The Coopster]

....

[Blackrain4xmas]

I have to agree with you there, but...I'm not sure opposition party members and supporters would care, and I'm certain they would ignore the necessity of "going it alone" had removing Saddam been an objectivein 1991 instead of 1998. More importantly, however, I think that if it came out, then that crucial middle 15% of the population would look at it and say, if it was ok to go it alone and remove Saddam in 03, then it would have been just as ok, and far better to have done it in 91. Sort of a ends justifies the means. In any case, the one thing that's really shined through all the BS in the 911 commission hearings is that every administration official has worked hard to cover their ass-ets. That's the over-riding theme. Maybe if the hearings had been held a yr after 911 instead of 3 yrs, a more honest and objective tone would dominate. Instead, we're back to the partisanship, reputation, career, booksales, and legacy first...American interests second. That's why I mentioned in the post that it's up to the mass media (don't hold your breath) and individuals to seek out the truth because there's very little desire to leave no stone unturned in DC. Nah, in an election year like this, and nearing the end of the longest election campaign fight in American history, no one's gonna want to stand up and say...I wish I'd have done this or that; not Cheny, Powell, Clinton, Gore, or Bush Sr. It's up to Americans.

[McGavin999]

I think most Americans know, instinctively, the connection. There are those who seek to assure us there IS not connection, but we know.

[Triple]

You rock. Awesome post.

Thanks,

[Triple]

You rock. Awesome post.

Thanks,

[justshutupandtakeit]

Needs to be seen in the light of day. Too much valuable info in this to be allowed to drop into the dustbin.

[potlatch]

Thanks for the ping ovrtaxt. I've been gone all weekend and am way behind in the news!!

[FlashBack]

Thanks for the ping...
tahnks for the great info...

No matter what is publically stated, we all KNOW that there was a connection. There's just too much info coming out for everyone to keep denying the facts.

Freepers ROCK!!!!!

[Blackrain4xmas]

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/6/2/224317.shtml

New Iraq Chief: Evidence Linking Saddam to 9/11 Is 'Genuine'

"The man tapped to head Iraq's new interim government has vouched for the authenticity of evidence that links Saddam Hussein to the 9/11 attacks."

"Though the notion that Iraq played a role in 9/11 is considered heresy in U.S. intelligence circles, newly appointed Iraq Prime Minister Ayad Allawi said in December that a document purported to be from Saddam's intelligence service that places lead 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta in Baghdad two months before the attacks was indeed 'genuine.'""



Hopefully all will be revealed at Saddam's trial-even though it might be under a Kerry administration with American troops pulling out :(

[jpl]

Very interesting indeed! Will the CIA and the State Department now work on concocting some bogus trumped-up charge against Ayad Allawi just like they did to Ahmed Chalabi? Or maybe Allawi is just another one of those dreaded "Neocons" giving everyone falsified information.

[Blackrain4xmas]

Actually, it'd be hard to do. Allawi isn't exactly PRO-American. He's often spoke out against the US, and that's reaassuring in that it's just enough to indicate that his drive is for Iraq not America's Iraq.

What really sucks for the left-a story lost in the Reagan memorials-is that Allawi believes that Saddam was involved in 911, has verified that document claiming Atta was trained by Abu Nidal, and claims that Iraq's unit 999 or those trained by them at Salman Pak...was involved in the actual hijackings.

Man, it'd be great if that came out soon.

[Blackrain4xmas]

Does anyone have anything to ADD to this "short" list
:)

[Quix]

THANKS TONS.

Have been wishing for just such a doc.

I just emailed it to an expanded list ofmy usual email recipients of such.

Blessings,

[gathersnomoss]

This bears repeating......

"If Kerry gets elected, he is going to turn us over to our enemies. He wants to be friends with the people who were taking Saddam's bribes. He is for security over democracy. Aren't all communists? I remember Kerry's lies to the Congress during Vietnam. I loathe him. He sounds just like Al Jazeera..."

Mr. Bush, now is the time to raise to the occasion and lead the United States of America into the future. You must win your second term!!!!