Posted on 05/28/2004 5:41:15 AM PDT by randita
GET THIS BOOK!
NOW AVAILABLE FOR ORDER AT AMAZON.
The Connection : How al Qaeda's Collaboration with Saddam Hussein Has Endangered America
by Stephen F. Hayes (Author)
According to John Batchelor and John Loftus (WABC), Stephen F. Hayes, a writer for The Weekly Standard, is going to be on Meet The Press this Sunday with Tim Russert. Batchelor and Loftus said that information in this book is going to be explosive.
Related post from 2003:
Figures the first conservative author interview on network TV would be in the middle of Memorial Day weekend.
I will wait to see the highlights on 60 Minutes.
Great post! It's about time. Of course we all knew this was obvious. Only the libs had their doubts. Now they'll have to eat dirt pie. I just love it when that happens.
The media is FINALLY starting to get it.
than two months before 9/11/01, the state-controlled Iraqi newspaper “Al-Nasiriya” carried a column headlined, “American, an Obsession called Osama Bin Ladin.” (July 21, 2001)
In the piece, Baath Party writer Naeem Abd Muhalhal predicted that bin Laden would attack the US “with the seriousness of the Bedouin of the desert about the way he will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House.”
The same state-approved column also insisted that bin Laden “will strike America on the arm that is already hurting,” and that the US “will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra every time he hears his songs” – an apparent reference to the Sinatra classic, “New York, New York”.
Other links here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1127451/posts
Good post! Al Gollum!
I laughed hard today when I saw it.
TS
I have no blog to speak of
bump
Batchelor was the conservative leaning of the two. I listen often and have never heard any conspiracy theories. Batchelor is very careful about only reported what's on the record in the public domain.
Okay, I'll retract the conspiracy remark -- but I do recall hearing stuff that was way out there ... stuff only they were reporting. Maybe I just wasn't looking in the right places.
Batchelor does tend to hit certain stories and highlight certain items that the mainstream press just glosses over or mentions only in passing.
The only thing I ever heard them get wrong is John Loftus's insistence that SH was taken out in the initial decapitation strike. He was relying on his CIA sources who sincerely believed that to be true, until they were tipped off as to SH's whereabouts and "unearthed" him. Loftus had to eat crow on that one.
Other stories, such as where the WMD went, etc. are being confirmed as each day goes by.
Gee, I guess we'll have to add Stephen Hayes' no-show on Meet The Press last Sunday, to that list of things that Loftus got wrong.
And while we're at it, let's add to the list, Loftus' other most recent bogus claim that the "chemical weapons" that Jordan confiscated from those Syrian/al-Qa'ida terrorist in April were VX nerve agent.
Loftus is just a pudgy Elmer Fudd with a bad hairpiece that just loves the attention he gets when pretending to be "in the know".
--Boot Hill
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.