Posted on 05/27/2004 7:43:12 PM PDT by wagglebee
Tom Broken-Craw will edit this out of his newscast.
Who did Batchelor say was booked on Meet the Press?
Nothing here...
Move on...
the author of this book, Stephen Hayes. But I am not sure, he may have been saying that facetiously. that's why I put the question mark at the end of my post.
this is the source:
'A new book by Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard, "The Connection," puts together the evidence of Saddam's ties to al-Qaida. '
John Loftus is also saying (I can feel Boot Hill cringing as he reads this!) that we have some iraqi nuclear scientist holed up - who will testify at Saddam's trial that IRaq had an active nuclear program that was transferred to Libya (equipment, scientists) before the war, and that Quadaffi is going to back this up.
???
I had to share what i heard on the local college radio station a short time ago. This is the closest forum i found to the subject.
The commentator, who did not sound like a student but an articulate older sounding man, was spouting what he claimed to be a legitimate connection between Al-qaeda and Tim McVeigh & Terry Nichols in particular, and white supremacist groups, in general. He claimed that this is being investigated and that terrorists like McVeigh and Nichols have more in common with Al-queda terrorists than meets the eye (the justification of which i didn't hear).
I just hope this idea doesn't grow legs.
It seems that there is an enormous amount of info out there and it sounds as if there is a ton more of it to come as documents are translated etc...But the administration needs to get off the pot as to letting the "sheeple" out there in on what's been found so far and how wrong the media/'Rats have been...
I heard various commentators saying that President Bush had four or five more 'speeches' coming up soon...I sure hope that they start laying out the facts before the people and in a BIG way!!
Smoking. Gun.
Thanks. Meet the Press choosing to give publicity to these reports would certainly be an interesting turn of events.
We presumably have access to Libya's records, assuming that Qadaffi is being as forthcoming as the U.S. says he is. So we should have ample documentation of any such transfer from Iraq to Libya. What would such testimony from an Iraqi nuclear scientist add?
If, on the other hand, the scientist's testimony is uncorroborated by what we have from Libya, then I don't think he'd be a very credible witness. In that case, one could easily believe that he's just telling us what we want to hear.
By the way, did Loftus mention the scientist's name?
Batchelor & Loftus ping.
bump
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.
This takes a long time to sort out this mess but could payoff really big when all is said and done.
I don't recal a name, I don't know if Boot Hill is still taping the Loftus segments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.