Skip to comments.
Why Won't the Bush Administration Tell Us the Truth About Terrorism?
FoxNews ^
| 5/26/04
| Bill O'Reilly
Posted on 05/26/2004 10:05:25 AM PDT by pookie18
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: what's up
I realize that the administration must be extremely cautious because of statements they originally made which turned out to be a bit less than correct. However, I believe that the administration has stated that there was no Saddam/Iraq-Al Qaeda link. In some national speech, I'd like to hear Pres. Bush discuss Salman Pak, al-Zarqawi, etc., but I think they're gunshy. I realize that most of the media isn't reporting these facts, but if the administration stated them nationally, the media would have to report them (while behind the scenes doing all they could to disprove them ;-)
41
posted on
05/26/2004 12:05:30 PM PDT
by
pookie18
To: forwardon
42
posted on
05/26/2004 12:07:38 PM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit softly. Teddy Roosevelt)
To: tx_eggman
So long troll
Forwardon:
This account has been banned or suspended.
Clean up on aisle three!
43
posted on
05/26/2004 12:09:26 PM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit softly. Teddy Roosevelt)
To: pookie18
As Commander-in-Chief Bush most likely does not want to tout the connection...Al Queda would pick up that and cover their tracks.
A good military strategy is to be quiet and let Al Queda make mistakes thinking Bush isn't on to them. Then they will slip up.
However, the media knows these things are out there and could investigate on their own. But they won't because that would help Bush politically.
To: forwardon; MeekOneGOP; jriemer; 4mycountry; mhking; onyx; tiamat; cyborg; TheBigB
Interesting ... About Jeb Bush's Excuetive order before http://www.state.fl.us/eog_new/eog/orders/...1-09-07-01.html Very Very suspicious .. I hope Fahrenheit 911 explains some of this ... I also hope the Take back the media clip on Bush in the Sarasota Elementary school is also dissected in the movie... http://www.takebackthemedia.com/true911.html
*********************
hrmn...
45
posted on
05/26/2004 12:31:27 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(the difference between "trained intellect" and "indoctrinated intellectual" is an Abyssal gulf)
To: tx_eggman
46
posted on
05/26/2004 12:32:04 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(the difference between "trained intellect" and "indoctrinated intellectual" is an Abyssal gulf)
To: pookie18
I'd like to buy that blowhard for what hes worth and sell him for what he thinks he is worth.
47
posted on
05/26/2004 2:37:37 PM PDT
by
Darlin'
("I will not forget this wound to my country." President George W Bush, 20 Sept 2001)
To: Darlin'
I'd like to buy that blowhard for what he's worth and sell him for what he thinks he is worth. Which blowhard? There are so many...
48
posted on
05/26/2004 2:40:57 PM PDT
by
pookie18
To: pookie18
He's been telling us the truth, he's told us the truth almost every day since 9/11/01. What part of "It's going to be a long war" doesn't O'Reilly understand?
President Bush has told us all along that there is a connection between Iraq and terrorism. There are things he can't say right now because we are IN a war and anything he tells us, he also tells the terrorists and their supporters.
Most of us are smart enough to go through the web, read the Iraqi blogs, read both the foreign and domestic press, read the CENTCOM briefings and we can figure out what's really happening that way. That is why most of us here on this board don't doubt what is being done.
49
posted on
05/26/2004 2:42:55 PM PDT
by
McGavin999
(If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
To: pookie18
Oh, Puke ! You shoulda warned me.... :(
50
posted on
05/26/2004 2:49:34 PM PDT
by
Darlin'
("I will not forget this wound to my country." President George W Bush, 20 Sept 2001)
To: King Prout; forwardon; tx_eggman
51
posted on
05/26/2004 2:56:38 PM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is ONLY ONE good Democrat: one that has just been voted OUT of POWER ! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: Darlin'
excellent way with words, Darlin'
52
posted on
05/26/2004 3:00:38 PM PDT
by
King Prout
(the difference between "trained intellect" and "indoctrinated intellectual" is an Abyssal gulf)
To: McGavin999
See reply #s 3, 8, 19 & 41. I realize that most FReepers know & care about this. The majority of people & the lamestream media either don't know or won't put it out...if it fosters their lie that..."Bush lied to us when he said there was a link between Saddam/Iraq & Al Qaeda", etc.
53
posted on
05/26/2004 3:00:40 PM PDT
by
pookie18
To: pookie18
I'm entertained by Bill and thats where it stops...he's an entertainer...not the Commander in Chief! He's not privileged to the real information that counts...let things be the way they are...Bill, you do your job and leave the serious stuff to our President.
54
posted on
05/26/2004 3:01:48 PM PDT
by
Hotdog
To: jpsb
If I were you, I would go back and see what the Dems have been saying about how they would fight terror. They did nothing in 1993 after the first attack on the WTC. Did nothing to stop the rise of Osama Bin Laden and his thugs in the 90's. They even attempted to negotiate a Middle East Peace Deal with a terrorist, Yasser Arafat. I have seen and heard nothing from them, maybe with the exception of Joseph Lieberman, that would make me think the Dems learned a thing from what happened on Sept 11, 2001. This isn't a stump speech for Bush, this is the cold hard reality. Wake up.
55
posted on
05/26/2004 3:11:12 PM PDT
by
miloklancy
(The biggest problem with the Democrats is that they are in office.)
To: antaresequity
This is not the "War on Terrorism", or "Terrorist", or "Terror" It is a war against militant "Islam".
Under any of the above ... where does/did Iraq fit in?
To: iconoclast
Research Salmon Pak, Zaraquawi to find your answer.
57
posted on
05/26/2004 3:33:54 PM PDT
by
antaresequity
(This is not the "War on Terror"...we don't fight tactics.)
To: PhiKapMom
Why does the pomposs jerk support John Kerry? I didn't get that from the piece.
58
posted on
05/26/2004 3:37:31 PM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: antaresequity
Yeah, sure. And as soon as Saddam was captured terrorism stopped.
Meanwhile Osama sits in Pakistan happy as a clam.
To: iconoclast
And as soon as Saddam was captured terrorism stopped. As soon as we took Guadacanal the war on Japan stopped
Its all part of the big puzzle. I suppose launching an offensive on Syria or Iran from Iraq never crossed your mind did it?
60
posted on
05/26/2004 3:57:34 PM PDT
by
antaresequity
(This is not the "War on Terror"...we don't fight tactics.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson