WARNING: This is a high volume ping list
Posted on 05/24/2004 2:19:31 AM PDT by kattracks
Given that we are under attack and at war, a certain fraying of nerves is understandable, but outright insanity is not. Lately, I have observed some fairly psychotic behavior in public places, mainly among the chattering classes, not among ordinary civilians who better understand that the terrorists mean to kill us and that appeasement is not an option.
For example, in the midst of a quiet cafe dinner, a soft-spoken artist friend suddenly began screaming: "I hate President Bush, I wish he was dead." Her face got red, and she screwed up her eyes. I was taken aback. Her rage was irrational and out of context; we had not been discussing the upcoming election or the ongoing war in Iraq. And, how could anyone be so angry, or rather so irrational, about a political figure?
Once, while lecturing in England, I found myself dining out with an anti-Apartheid activist at the very moment that Nelson Mandela was released from jail. This scholar literally climbed onto the table and roared for more than 5 full minutes. She kept pumping the air with her fist. Her voice became coarse. I could not understand such ferocity and pent-up emotion unleashed so bizarrely in public.
I can understand marshalling arguments, point by point, against a particular political policy. I can understand faulting President Bush for either not going far enough to win the war in Iraq or daring to begin that war at all--as long as the person is speaking in a reasonable, rational way. I can respect a balanced analysis--such as the recent one by Mark Helprin in the pages of the Wall Street Journal (5/17/04) in which he describes "the Democrats (as) guilty of ideological confusion about self-defense, the Republicans of willful disdain for reflection, and both... for subjecting the serious business in the life of a nation to coarse partisanship."
But I cannot understand what is going on when presumably enlightened artists and scholars reduce complex realities to slogans, and create straw men against which to vent vast, irrational rage. This is precisely what frenzied Islamist mobs do when they burn the American flag and lynch and mutilate corpses of American soldiers.
The western multiculturalists insist that we have dangerously "humiliated" the Iraqi male prisoners because we put women in charge of naked men and then subjected those naked men to further humiliation by posing them in pornography-like photographs, and forcing some men to wear pink women's undergarments.
In my view, this is possibly the result of a culture saturated with runaway pornography. It is disgusting and I oppose it, but it does not compare to the be-heading of Daniel Pearl and Nicholas Berg or to the real torture practiced by Saddam Hussein in Abu Graib and most Arab and Muslim despots against their own people.
The multiculturalists do not protest at all when male Palestinian terrorists dress as women in order to kill Israelis (which they have done at many an Israeli checkpoint). They did not condemn the Palestinian terrorists who shot and killed an eight-month pregnant Israeli woman and her four children, aged 2 to 11 at point-blank range; rather, they blamed the woman for "provoking" her own murder by living in Gaza. The multi-cultis did not cry "humiliation foul" when two other Palestinian terrorists dressed as women in order to shoot down the mourners at this poor woman's funeral.
The left-liberal Western media (heavily influenced by the Left Academy) is not behaving objectively or rationally when it not only fails to note that "pornography" is really "torture," but ardently defends the rights of pornographers and traffickers; our Talking Heads worship the First Amendment and are "sex-positive" in outlook. They do not condemn torture when Arabs or Muslims practice it, only when it is practiced, even to a much lesser extent, by America. (By the way, I oppose torture in all but the most extreme of circumstances. I am demanding that our intellectuals eschew double standards and be even-handed with their condemnations).
Something has gone very wrong in America among its Thinking Classes who hate the very country that allows them to publicly criticize its policies and who love those countries in which dissent is punished by torture and execution. Stalinism, Hitlerism, totalitarianism--long nurtured by the former Soviet Union through both the United Nations, the Arab League, and the PLO--are living and breathing among our intellectuals, academics, and left-liberal media. American intellectuals also slavishly follow the lead of their European counterparts.
As a psychologist, I must ask: are our intellectuals brainwashed? What cult has done this to them? How might they be de-programmed? Are such accomplished and privileged adults still angry at their parents, spouses, or employers or are they angry at themselves for having failed to "overthrow capitalism" in their lifetime? If so, do they think that we all deserve to die for their failure? Do they honestly believe that the jihadists will provide the socialist or feminist Paradise for which they long?
I do not think I can persuade such intellectuals to understand that their lives and ways of life are in serious danger and that self-defense is crucial; that there is nothing we can do that will "appease" Islamist rage (sacrifice Israel, retreat from Iraq and Afghanistan, veil our women, allow Arab honor killings to be carried out in both Eurabia and North America).
It is clear: The terrorists have embarked on a program to kill all non-Muslim infidels--it's precisely what al-Zarquawi said on the video before he be-headed Nicholas Berg--and the danger coming our way is even greater from Muslim Indonesia.
What I can and must do is suggest--no implore--President Bush to send more troops to Iraq immediately and to use all means at our disposal to stop the Islamists in their tracks--at least for another 500 years. Otherwise, we will be annihilated.
BIO: Phyllis Chesler, Ph.D is Emerita Professor of Psychology and the author of twelve books including THE NEW ANTI-SEMITISM. THE CURRENT CRISIS AND WHAT WE MUST DO ABOUT IT. She may be reached at her website www.phyllis-chesler.com.
Very well said! I might add .... the only thing dumber than a rock, is a DemonRAT!
Kudos to Phyllis!
I have a few aquaintances and relatives who are well educated liberals who for the most part are articulate and well mannered. Start talking politics and they become irrational; literally screaming and vulgar. There is an underlying hatred of conservatism that scares me because I see no cause and they haven't been able to explain it.
Reference bump.
War, in particular, makes libs hoppin' mad because the seriousness of the situation puts their tree-hugging, welfare-dependent mentality in the "petty" category.
Who else but the truly hateful would try to control "hate" through legislation? Instead of controlling themselves - which they can't - they think the government can do it with laws. They feel guilt over their hateful "feelings", and there's nothing worse than a guilt-ridden lib with no soul.
The left hates the right because we bring their deficiencies out into the open. They can't and won't control themselves, so they make excuses for everything from pornography to abortion. Like a child who steals a cookie and won't fess up, the left is happy to taste the sweet cookie, but gets angry when confronted with the consequences.
Well, it's a little early for analysis. More coffee.
bump
WARNING: This is a high volume ping list
And it's getting worse, isn't it? That's why we're teetering on the edge of open civil war in this country.
I agree with your points, but I think all of them are secondary effects. It all comes down to philosophy. Our country was founded on and made great by enlightenment philosophy. Our current culture totally embraces its antithesis, kantian philosophy and its derivatives.
That philosophy affects everything from the the way we look at the world, the way we think, the concept of right and wrong at an individual as well as group/political level.
Angry and irrational. Those two words sum up Liberalism.
Because their Ivory Towerism means they are drinking their own bathwater and are not connected to reality.
Demon possession.
The problem is they have this cavity in the left side of there head and we they hear something like Ronnie Reagan or Charleton Heston the neutrons in there head start flying around and they hit that cavity and fall in.
When that happens there brain just shuts down, from that point on they cannot think or make since of anything all logic is gone.
Fortunately, our side has all the guns...and they know it.
So on other words, Dr. Chesler has finally figured out what Freepers have been saying for years - that liberalism is a mental illness.
True, but that's not going to stop them. Here's what I said in another thread:
There's little in the way or rationality and restraint left to govern the actions of the entitled classes. The Left is ratcheting up the level of vitriol and hatred to a degree unprecedented save for the times leading up to, oh, say, the first American Civil War or the collapse of the old Weimar Republic into murderous totalitarianism.
Let us not forget for a moment what the aims of these America haters, these radical utopians are: the utter dissolution of dissent and destruction of those who would get in the way of the perfect world that they seek to create. When they see it all slipping away - in what passes for their own minds, at any rate - their rage and hatred will not be contained.
It's also useful to remember just how thin the veneer of civilization is, and how with a will, the Left has sought to dissolve it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.