Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House OKs plan to allow military to patrol borders
TEAM AMERICA PAC ^ | 5/22/04

Posted on 05/23/2004 10:07:11 AM PDT by Die_Hard Conservative Lady

House OKs plan to allow military to patrol borders advertisement

Sergio Bustos Gannett News Service May. 20, 2004 04:18 PM

WASHINGTON - U.S. soldiers may be asked to keep undocumented immigrants and potential terrorists out of the country.

The House approved a defense authorization bill Thursday that includes an amendment that would let American soldiers join U.S. Border Patrol agents in guarding the borders with Canada and Mexico.

The amendment, championed by Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va., passed the House late Wednesday 231-191.

But the amendment stands little chance of surviving because it was not part of the Senate's defense authorization bill.

Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-El Paso, who spent 26 years with the Border Patrol, opposed the amendment, saying it was "simply the wrong solution to our current problems along the border."

"This amendment will send our military personnel to our borders at a time when they are already stretched thin in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Korea, Kosovo, Bosnia, and over 100 other countries around the world," he said. "We cannot and we should not ask our military personnel to patrol our borders."

Southern Arizona lawmakers whose districts run along the U.S.-Mexico border echoed the same argument.

"Border security is and continues to be a top priority for me and for the Congress as a whole," said Rep. Jim Kolbe, R-Tucson. "But the Goode amendment would militarize our border and stretch the resources of our Army."

Said Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Tucson: "The amendment was very mean-spirited and had nothing to do with national security. We can be grateful that it probably won't survive the Senate-House conference."

Goode argued that troops could be "of significant assistance to prevent the infiltration of terrorists, drug traffickers and illegal aliens, and could prevent the entry of weapons of mass destruction into our country."

Pentagon officials also opposed the idea, according to Kolbe and other lawmakers.

The Bush administration has already threatened to veto the House bill because it includes a provision that would delay the next round of base closings until 2007.

The bill authorizes Defense Department programs for the coming fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; arizonaborder; bordersecurity; virgilgoode
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 05/23/2004 10:07:12 AM PDT by Die_Hard Conservative Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Die_Hard Conservative Lady

do not like the idea


2 posted on 05/23/2004 10:09:53 AM PDT by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Die_Hard Conservative Lady

Does this mean that when certain elements of the Mexican Army make covering runs for illegals and they shoot at US citizens, the Army can fire back?

And the Border Patrol guys can have some backup for when they get shot at?


3 posted on 05/23/2004 10:14:46 AM PDT by Darksheare (Decorate rooms and furniture with your sleeping friend's carcasses. -Gothic car sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camas

You might have a different opinion if you lived as I and many others do right on the Forward Edge of the Battle Area.

We did it until well after WWI and to some extent during WWII.


4 posted on 05/23/2004 10:21:38 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Die_Hard Conservative Lady; DumpsterDiver; gubamyster
Said Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Tucson: "The amendment was very mean-spirited and had nothing to do with national security. We can be grateful that it probably won't survive the Senate-House conference."

Mean spirited? What a load. I think it's a great idea.

5 posted on 05/23/2004 10:25:14 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (Torrance Ca....land of the flying monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Does this mean that when certain elements of the Mexican Army make covering runs for illegals and they shoot at US citizens, the Army can fire back?

No. The Mexican Army is a noble institution staffed by the most highly trained and finest examples of manhood that has ever been seen, and protects a "great nation" whose achievments the world attempts to emulate.

The American Army, by contrast, is staffed by abusers and sadists, whose core interest is racism against the poor, bedraggled people desperately doing anything they can to escape the "great nation" to the south, and who cannot be trusted to ever stand guard on the illegitimate border of the evil nation that they represent.

The American Army will only be allowed to pass out travel maps, Snickers bars, and refill canteens for the great and wondrous people, on their way North to fulfill their missionary destiny to create Mexico in the rest of the world.

6 posted on 05/23/2004 10:25:15 AM PDT by Regulator (At least, that's the way Wolf Blitzer will spin it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Die_Hard Conservative Lady

Dumb idea!


7 posted on 05/23/2004 10:28:01 AM PDT by verity (The Liberal Media is America's Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camas

"do not like the idea"

Why?


8 posted on 05/23/2004 10:31:54 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Die_Hard Conservative Lady

It will die in the Senate, like everything else.


9 posted on 05/23/2004 10:33:50 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Kerry is a major dork))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Die_Hard Conservative Lady

It's about time we kept Massachusetts illegals out of New Hampshire!


10 posted on 05/23/2004 10:34:09 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

*Ugh*
In all likelyhood, should certain leftist elements have their way, what you describe is all too likely.
"Tour guide in US National Parks" would be a better description of that kind of 'border security'.


11 posted on 05/23/2004 10:34:14 AM PDT by Darksheare (Decorate rooms and furniture with your sleeping friend's carcasses. -Gothic car sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Die_Hard Conservative Lady
"We cannot and we should not ask our military personnel to patrol our borders."

This has to be the single dumbest thing I've heard a legislator say... okay, well, at least today. Have we gotten so used to not fighting on our own soil that we've forgottent that the primary purpose of an army, *any* army, is to maintain the territorial integrity of the nation? Sheesh.

Specifically, the National Guard is utterly suited for this task. The posse comitatus laws don't apply to the NG. Get the Guard out of Iraq, put them on the border. Hell, let Guard units do their two week annual training on the SW border. Or, just mine the hell out of the border and put soldiers in overwatch. Whatever! JUST SEAL THE BORDER!

12 posted on 05/23/2004 10:43:35 AM PDT by Terabitten (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of All Who Threaten It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Die_Hard Conservative Lady
I don't know whether using troops on the border is the best solution, but I like the idea of securing the border. I'd be more than willing to bring troops home from some other places around the world to accomplish this task, but maybe there are other ways. Maybe the border patrol should be given more people and more weapons.

The most important change is a change of attitude. We need people to be serious about using whatever force is necessary to keep illegal aliens out of the country. In addition to using force against them, we need to stop giving them incentives to be here. We need to stop giving them benefits from our social services entitlements. We need to stop treating them as if they have a right to be here. Until that attitude changes, I don't see a solution to the problem.

Defining Personal Responsibility
Bill

13 posted on 05/23/2004 10:50:30 AM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Die_Hard Conservative Lady
U.S. soldiers may be asked to keep undocumented immigrants and potential terrorists out of the country.

"...may be asked..." Does anyone out there realize what an absurd situation this is. U.S. soldier 'may be asked' to keep undocumenteds and potention terrorists out. Until they are asked, the illegals and yes, some actual terrorists will gain entry. As we saw on 09/11/01, it takes very few terrorists to exact incredible damage the U.S. Now in the midst of a war on terrorism, the media reports that we may finally get our borders under control.

Frankly, if we can do no better than this, I have to ask if we are deserving of a future. This disgusts me to the absolute max.

14 posted on 05/23/2004 11:01:08 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
I found the following excerpts posted at http://www.e-thepeople.org/article/32085/view

Before me, I have two lists. One list contains the names of countries which have stood by our side during the Iraq conflict.

The other list [List 2] contains everyone not on the first list. Most of the world's nations are on that list.

Mexico is ... on List 2.

President Fox and his entire corrupt government really need an attitude adjustment. I have a couple extra tank and infantry divisions sitting around. Guess where I'm gonna put 'em? Yep, border security. So start doing something with your oil. Oh, by the way, the United States is abrogating the NAFTA treaty--starting now. It is time for America to focus on its own welfare and its own citizens.

To the nations on List 2, a final thought: DROP DEAD.

15 posted on 05/23/2004 12:33:27 PM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Die_Hard Conservative Lady

On the slim chance that it would pass the Senate, I will bet my pension check that George Bush will veto this in a micro second!


16 posted on 05/23/2004 12:35:16 PM PDT by navyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver

Agreed!
And well said.
Wonder who first came up with it.


17 posted on 05/23/2004 12:48:34 PM PDT by Darksheare (Decorate rooms and furniture with your sleeping friend's carcasses. -Gothic car sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Die_Hard Conservative Lady
House OKs plan to allow military to patrol borders

We should definitely do the same as Mexico does and place our military on our borders.

18 posted on 05/23/2004 12:53:13 PM PDT by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
lived in Arizona for years. as a matter of fact I lived in the prison camp at Mt. Lemon. also was in the military (air force). no, the military is not a police force which what is needed to patrol the border. look what happened when they were asked to guard prisoners in Iraq. it is also kind of an insult to them to have to do civilian work.
19 posted on 05/23/2004 1:00:33 PM PDT by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: camas

Civilians are not allowed to shoot back at Mexican Army regulars doing border incursions.


20 posted on 05/23/2004 1:07:55 PM PDT by Darksheare (Decorate rooms and furniture with your sleeping friend's carcasses. -Gothic car sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson