Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/19/2004 11:42:26 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Caving in again.


2 posted on 05/19/2004 11:43:36 AM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Pardon my language, but WHAT THE HELL?! The dimocrats illegally block the up or down vote on nominees and they get rewarded with success in stopping the ones they don't like as well as a promise not to use the only way around their illegal block?!
3 posted on 05/19/2004 11:45:36 AM PDT by highlander_UW (A liberal is a man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel. - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
I saw this yesterday on TV. My reaction to this news is:
F&#$%(#%^!!!!!!!

I saw Das-hole on TV making it "very clear" that this is only a compromise for 25 predetermined candidates. None of the more "controversial" nominees were being considered - nor will they ever be.
4 posted on 05/19/2004 11:48:09 AM PDT by Jaysun (If a person says that he enjoys the opera, that person is a liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

"Mr. Bush agreed not to bypass the Senate by using recess appointments to install any more nominees on the federal bench"

Why the heck not? That's the only way he's going to get them all confirmed. Besides, it definitely puts the demoncRATS in a bad light.


5 posted on 05/19/2004 11:49:55 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; Admin Moderator
Look no offense meant, but this story has been already posted at least three times.

(this is happening an awful lot lately??)

7 posted on 05/19/2004 11:51:27 AM PDT by Condor51 ("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
I think the Prez must have run out of nominees willing to accept recess appointments.

The Republican Senate should be embarrassed. It almost makes me hope they loose control, then they'll have a better excuse.

It now appears that the U.S.Constitution no longer applies to Demoncrat senators. I would like to think that they will pay someday but I doubt it.

The founding fathers are rolling over in their graves on this one.

I JUST WANT TO PUKE!!!!!!!!!!!

8 posted on 05/19/2004 11:52:34 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Kerry is a dork))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Sen. Orrin G. Hatch has postponed the committee hearing on his nomination 19 times while he negotiates with Sen. Carl Levin, Michigan Democrat, over Judge Saad and three other Bush nominees from Michigan. Mr. Levin remains angry that a a cousin's wife wasn't confirmed to that same court when President Clinton was in office.

The Senate is full of vengeful, selfish, spiteful losers who hold grudges for years. Atta way to put the country's interests first, Senator Levin!

9 posted on 05/19/2004 11:53:05 AM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
>> Mr. Holmes has been harshly criticized for religious writings in which he said women belong in roles subservient to men.

Monica Lewinsky was so subservient she had to wear knee pads, but we didn't hear the liberal Establishment going to war with Billy Bentpotus over that one.

Next week's lesson: The Prophet Mohammed allows you to beat uppity feminists with a stick.

</deliciously perceptive albeit faintly sarcastic social commentary

12 posted on 05/19/2004 12:01:20 PM PDT by T'wit (Liberal to child: you'll sink into depravity eventually, so do it at home, now, where it's hygienic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
OK everybody --go back and reread the terms carefully. Bush agreed not to use recess appointments for the rest of his term. That means THIS term, once he is reelected and is on his new term the deal no longer applies.

Basically this was a 25 for 5 trade for 6 months. IOW Bush just got 83% of his nominees approved instead of ZERO.

14 posted on 05/19/2004 12:10:27 PM PDT by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; P-Marlowe; Howlin; MeekOneGOP
Mr. Holmes has been harshly criticized for religious writings in which he said women belong in roles subservient to men.

This criticism is shared by several Senate Republicans, including Sens. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, and Olympia J. Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine.

Here's the issue why the deal was struck. On paper, we are getting 56 votes to invoke cloture. It includes the above 4. In reality, we are 8 votes away and not just 4.

The rino senators vote for cloture because they know it won't be reached. If it were ever reached, they would then vote against it.

A side note: I'll bet what the religious writings of Mr Holmes really said was that a husband has the servant leadership rresponsibility in the home. This is biblical.

The above, though, does constitute a religious test for a government office. Now THAT is illegal.

19 posted on 05/19/2004 12:36:03 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Would serve the Dems right if Bush simply "forgot" his promise not to recess appoint.


21 posted on 05/19/2004 12:38:19 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Any "church" that can't figure out abortion and homosexuality isn't worthy of the appellation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

"Among the high-profile nominations not on the list are California Justice Janice Rogers Brown for the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and Texas Justice Priscilla Owen to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.."

HUH????

so an agreement to pass the nominees they would pass anyway???!??

But not the KEY NOMINEES THAT THEY WERE HOLDING UP????!?!?

AND NOW BUSH HAS TAKEN A KEY ISSUE OFF THE CAMPAIGN TABLE?!?!?


22 posted on 05/19/2004 12:45:51 PM PDT by WOSG (Peace through Victory! Iraq victory, W victory, American victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
It looks to me like W/Rove don't give a rat's _ss what we think of them.

this is getting awful OLD!

>

25 posted on 05/19/2004 1:04:41 PM PDT by Cheapskate ("We got the Steeley Dan t shirts!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

A "Deal" with Democrats means head they win, tails we loose.

Why do so many Republican politicians come in different shades of yellow when it regards playing hardball with Democrats????


29 posted on 05/19/2004 1:16:24 PM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Who blinked first? Will this be a flip or a flop, a flip/flop, and for who? How would this strategy be described in terms of 'Texas hold'em' for the poker players among us?


30 posted on 05/19/2004 1:16:41 PM PDT by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Daschle might not be "deeply saddened," but I am.


34 posted on 05/19/2004 1:22:26 PM PDT by JohnBDay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson