Posted on 05/19/2004 6:42:16 AM PDT by veronica
Column alleging Bush invaded Iraq to please Jews draws accusations of anti-Semitism
WASHINGTON — In the face of charges of anti-Semitism, U.S. Sen. Fritz Hollings on Tuesday defended a newspaper column he wrote alleging President Bush went to war in Iraq to defend Israel and please American Jews.
Hollings declined a request for an interview Tuesday, but he released a letter defending his comments and calling “ridiculous” any criticism of them as anti-Semitic.
One S.C. Jewish leader was “horrified” by Hollings’ writings. The nation’s most prominent Jewish civil rights organization called on Hollings to renounce his charges.
“The whole foreign policy of the United States is based on Israel? What kind of ridiculous statement is that?” said Rabbi Philip Silverstein of Columbia’s Beth Shalom synagogue. “It makes him anti-Israel. It’s anti-Semitic ... it’s dangerous.”
Throughout his 38-year Senate career, Hollings, a Charleston Democrat, has apologized for remarks that have been decried as callous toward Jews, blacks, Japanese and other groups.
In the column, published this month in The State and two other S.C. newspapers, Hollings wrote that Israeli officials had known there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
“With Iraq no threat, why invade a sovereign country? The answer: President Bush’s policy to secure Israel.”
He also wrote that Bush “came to office with one thought — re-election. Bush felt tax cuts would hold his crowd together, and spreading democracy in the Mideast to secure Israel would take the Jewish vote from the Democrats.”
Hollings also named three people as particularly responsible for Bush’s zeal to invade Iraq — Richard Perle, the former chairman of a board that advises Pentagon leaders; assistant Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz; and syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer. All are Jewish.
Abraham Foxman, president of The Anti-Defamation League, urged Hollings to renounce his latest comments.
“This is reminiscent of age-old, anti-Semitic canards about a Jewish conspiracy to control and manipulate government,” Foxman wrote in a letter to Hollings.
Foxman said he knows some will dismiss Hollings’ choice of words as simply Hollings being Hollings.
“To them we say one doesn’t take bigotry in stride,” Foxman said. “He is one out of 100 (senators). These are 100 of the most prominent people in the country. To hear such crudeness, such ugliness, such classical anti-Semitism. It’s sad.”
In place of a statement, Hollings’ staff made available a letter to a constituent — whom they would not identify — who had written to Hollings to take issue with his column.
“It is my experienced opinion from supporting Israel here in the Senate for almost 38 years, that diplomacy and negotiation is the route we should take, not the military,” Hollings wrote. “I could cite numerous quotes to support my mentioning Perle, Wolfowitz and Krauthammer and otherwise give quotes of distinguished leaders of the State of Israel that support my position.”
Hollings wrote that calling his opinion “anti-Jewish stereotyping or scapegoating is ridiculous.”
U.S. Rep. Jim DeMint, R-Greenville, wrote a letter, that was published in The State, after he read Hollings’ piece. DeMint called the column “bizarre and, at worst, chilling.”
DeMint is seeking the GOP nomination for the Senate seat from which Hollings will retire next year.
DeMint said Tuesday he has refrained from criticizing Hollings but felt he had to respond because Hollings had so mischaracterized the president’s decision to go to war.
“I don’t know how anyone sitting in all those briefings for all those years could possibly bring it down to the motive for going into Iraq having anything to do with a focus on our friendship with Israel,” DeMint said. “It’s something Congress voted heavily in favor of doing.”
Hollings voted in 2002 to give Bush permission to attack Iraq but later said he was misled and that the war is a mistake comparable to American action in Vietnam.
The Democrat party is filled with anti-Semites, just as is liberal Europe.
Too much consuming going out there.
I wonder if this old goat will get the Trent Lott treatment by CNN, ABS,CBS and NBS and their comrades in Arms the NY and LA Slimes?
Doubt it!
Sounds like he is a little anti-semitic..... what a jerk.
Misled by WHOM? Senator, you are one of the 100 most powerful people in the world, and you can't make an informed vote on military actions? The President is supposed to do YOUR job? No sir, that won't cut it... you get the SAME intelligence reports as the President. You can't cast a vote to gain support of conservative Southernors and then claim you were misled to please Southern liberals.
Nah - he's just "anti-Zionist" and he does not like the "neo-cons." But he's not anti-semitic. /sarcasm
They don't disagree with W.
They are on the other side.
IS IT TREASON YET?
If he were a Republican, he'd have been gone a long time ago.
Finally Foxman gets a hit. Good.
Not "a jerk"
Evil
Dangerous
Why do these pukes continue to attract the majority of Jewish voters ?
I agree. I wish he would focus his concern on episodes like this one, and islamonazis, instead of fighting ghosts of antisemitism from decades if not centuries past.
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
Yes, it is what he get's paid for.
Moron!!!
This POS, like Dirty Bird and most of the senior Rat senators, has been a racist and anti Israel/Jew all of his life.
However, since he hates GW, votes for abortion and gay rights, he will get a free pass on this as in the past.
What a waste of air this POS consumes each day of his vile life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.