Gay marrieds say they will not be monogamous

Boston Fishwrap ^ | 5/18/04 | Duncan

[pabianice]

Place your bets on how long it will be before two men and a sheep will have the "civil right" to be married. I guess that's one way of getting your animal on your family health plan.

[Chewbacca]

If they are married and not monogomous, doesn't that mean they are in an adulterous marriage?

Is adultery a punishable crime in MA?

[Semper Paratus]

Is adultery a punishable crime in MA?

No but its grounds for a divorce.

[Dr Snide]

I thought the whole point of marriage was monagomy. This is what people mean when they say homosexual marriage threatens the sanctity of marriage. I am begining to think that George Bush may will this year because of this issue.

[Always Right]

If they are married and not monogomous, doesn't that mean they are in an adulterous marriage?

Two people of the same sex engaging in sex is adulterous, no matter how the Mass. Supreme Court redefines marriage.

[Junior]

What's the point (other than blowing $25 on a piece of paper)?

[Phantom Lord]

An open marriage between gays?!?!? That would never happen between heterosexuals. Never!

[volchef]

It's pretty scarry thinking about children being adopted into these homes and being exposed to an endless parade of sexual deviants and disease. Herpes, AIDS, warts, syphliss, gonorrhea, chlamydia, hepatitis.............ugh makes me wanna puke.

[freeangel]

Anybody with half a brain could see that this maneuver was to have someone elses employer pay for benefits for those that did not. Care for AIDS, hepatitis C and other "gay" diseases is forever and expensive and, after all, why should lifestyle changes be required if you can get treatment for "free"?

[DBrow]

What's the point (other than blowing $25 on a piece of paper)?

That's the point- make heterosex marriage worthless. Make it "just a piece of paper".

Marx said that to form the perfect communist/socialist state the "slavery of bourgoise marriage" had to be ended.

[thoughtomator]

The point is to give a big F-U to every person who respects the institution of marriage.

[thackney]

I wonder how many bothered with a pre-nupt?

[Poohbah]

Anybody with half a brain could see that this maneuver was to have someone elses employer pay for benefits for those that did not. Care for AIDS, hepatitis C and other "gay" diseases is forever and expensive and, after all, why should lifestyle changes be required if you can get treatment for "free"?

Look for employers in MA and in states that recognize these "marriages" to terminate employee healthcare benefits...and then look for Kerry & Clinton to propose national healthcare.

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

By all means lets not discriminate against this fine family where children are concerned. Usher in some kiddies for these two (cough!) "moral" <cough!) individuals.

[ezo4]

gay's are a biological mistake. And a detriment to our country.

[freepatriot32]

Gay marrieds say they will not be monogamous

I'm SHOCKED just shocked I tellyou this has come as a total suprise to me I mean if only someone would have predicted this would happen when the whole gay marriage thing was being debated it wouldnt have blindsided me so much / sarcasm

[Semper Paratus]

I wonder how many bothered with a pre-nupt?

Te-RAY-zuh said "Of course I got a pre-nupt, doesn't everybody (worth 900 million) have a pre-nupt?

[jtminton]

as a bisexual

Call me old fashioned, but I don't believe anybody is bi-sexual. You are either gay or straight.

[sathers]

ding, ding, ding.. We have a winning response!

[Sacajaweau]

These folks should take out an orgy license not a marriage license.