Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: *Taxreform
To: Remember_Salamis
The only people to have successfully taxed and reduced SS benefits have been RATs.
3 posted on
05/15/2004 4:52:57 AM PDT by
evad
("Such an enemy cannot be deterred, detained, appeased, or negotiated with. It can only be destroyed")
To: Remember_Salamis
This is fantasy. Image Charles Rangel D-NY as Chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee. Then you too could be the prophet of Charlie's rANGELs. Demos believe he ends justify the means. Their only end-game is power>POWER>>>P O W E R !!!! We all know they stand for nothing. Neil gives them much credit they do not deserve.
4 posted on
05/15/2004 4:53:32 AM PDT by
Broker
(POGO)
To: Remember_Salamis
Ed 'ASS' Asner made nice recordings claiming Reublicans were going to cut the elderely from Social Security...and then they started calling everyone..scaring them into voting democrap...
Fear and Lies....courtesy Ed Asner.....friendly ole Lou Grant....first they create and image and then they exploit that image...Walter Chronkite being another kindly ole gentle 'commie traitor'
IMO
6 posted on
05/15/2004 4:56:51 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Remember_Salamis
The goal is clear. Democrats want to milk the high-achievers A lot of "high achievers" with very healthy 401k plans are in reality "disiplined savers". A plan to confiscate 15% of my 401k plan is conspiracy to commit larceny.
To: Remember_Salamis
Great article! thank you.
8 posted on
05/15/2004 5:27:52 AM PDT by
mrtysmm
To: Remember_Salamis
I always appreciate an article where the writer calls the rats what they are - socialists. The word should be used often and widely.
9 posted on
05/15/2004 5:42:38 AM PDT by
sergeantdave
(Gen. Custer wore an Arrowsmith shirt to his last property owner convention.)
To: Remember_Salamis
What is this guy talking about? Pension fund and 401k plans are eventually taxed.
Also he makes no mention of The Earned Income Tax Credit which was set up by Congress- essentially as an income-redistribution program. It provides a cash subsidy directly to lower-income workers to reduce their payroll tax burdens. So yet again, people at the lower end are getting a free ride. Jeesh!
10 posted on
05/15/2004 5:57:58 AM PDT by
petercooper
(Islam is not a religion of peace. It's a sadistic death cult.)
To: Remember_Salamis
All this reminds me of when the Clintons were in office and some of the things Hillary was trying to achieve. God help us! Is America destined to have these two criminals from the Criminal Party around forever?
11 posted on
05/15/2004 6:28:11 AM PDT by
swampfox98
(Beyond 2004 - Chaos! no matter who wins the presidency Fox will be our co President.)
To: Remember_Salamis
So much for keeping it secret. ;~)
13 posted on
05/15/2004 6:38:45 AM PDT by
verity
To: Remember_Salamis; Liz; Howlin; ALOHA RONNIE; RonDog
The Democrats have begun their campaign to frighten voters before the fall elections.It could almost be called a terrorist tactic - no?
14 posted on
05/15/2004 6:41:52 AM PDT by
Libloather
(What REALLY repulses the Beast? A cheating so-called husband maybe?)
To: Remember_Salamis
This is the most important presidential election since 1860. Democrat propaganda will intensify as November approaches. Expect the worst. Their allies in the "newsmedia" will use every device available and will create new ones, and remember, so-called "journalists" are 90% Democrat.
The propaganda is going to be relentless, ubiquitous, imaginative, and both subtle and audacious.
Do not fall for it!
Do your best to keep people aware of what's going on!
16 posted on
05/15/2004 7:01:34 AM PDT by
Savage Beast
(My parents, grandparents, and greatgrandparents were all Democrats. My children are Republicans.)
To: Remember_Salamis
And be constantly alert for Democrat taqija!
17 posted on
05/15/2004 7:03:33 AM PDT by
Savage Beast
(My parents, grandparents, and greatgrandparents were all Democrats. My children are Republicans.)
To: Remember_Salamis
Bump for later.
20 posted on
05/15/2004 7:18:35 AM PDT by
ExSoldier
(When the going gets tough, the tough go cyclic. (R.I.P. harpseal))
To: Remember_Salamis; *Taxreform
I concur...the same
VERY OLD playbook.
..the GOP has controlled the house for over 9 years...during that time and talk radio, its been shown that the Democratic Playbook to be nothing more than a cheap collection worn-out campaign tactics...to scare the hell out of Sr. Citizens, every two years...
23 posted on
05/15/2004 9:35:45 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
To: Remember_Salamis
Repealing the Second Amendment "Haven't you ever thought it a bit odd that leftists and Democrats are generally opposed to the concept of the private ownership of firearms, while conservatives and libertarians favor the idea? Well, there's a reason. Those who value and celebrate the worth of the individual and of individual freedom generally believe that the individual should be permitted to own and bear arms. Those who put the power of government over and above the power of the individual would just as soon see the individual unarmed. Armed individuals are, of course, a threat to tyranny.
Boortz is dead on here. (pun intended)
The socialists (aka democRATS) fear us now, and if they take control of the gubmint 'repealing' the 2nd Amendment is high on their list (That's for 'darn' sure). But getting it passed by all the states required? I don't know about that. However, I sure see them usurping and stripping it at every opportunity, the AWB being their current objective. In the near future any weapon with a magazine capable of holding more that ONE round will be an Assault Weapon. Not to mention the caliber. Heck, we'll likely be limited to using .22 shorts and H&R .410ga shotguns! ( note 1 )
Also, this reminds me of a Senate speech a couple/few years back by Senator Swimmer Kennedy, wherein he said that the 2nd Amendment isn't 'necessary' anymore and it's concept is obsolete. That it's intent was to prevent a tyrannical government and that in these times we have nothing to fear from our government! I saw this speech played on FNC at the time. He was serious and I think sober.
So when thinking about being PO'd at Dubya come Nov. think long and hard and vote for Bush, do it - for the YOUR children.
I AM THE NRA
1; I have nothing personal against Harrington & Richardson single shot, .410 ga shotguns.
24 posted on
05/15/2004 11:35:37 AM PDT by
Condor51
("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)
To: Remember_Salamis
To: Stillwaters
26 posted on
05/15/2004 1:15:12 PM PDT by
lonevoice
(Some things have to be believed to be seen)
To: Remember_Salamis
27 posted on
05/15/2004 1:17:35 PM PDT by
shield
(The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
To: Remember_Salamis
Right now the cap is around $88,000 on Social Security taxes. To cover the shortfall Reich says they will just raise the salary cap by $15,000 ... to $103,000 a hear. Reich forgets, though, that there is no cap on Medicare taxes, so raising the cap by $15,000 would not recover the Medicare taxes lost by excluding the first $15,000 in income. In reality the Democrats would have to raise the salary cap by about $19,000. They would just round it off to $20,000. It's not even that simple. Let's say the first $15,000 (or $20,000) is exempt from SS. Raising the $88,000 cap by an exuivalent amount won't cover the lost revenue -- the number of people earning $88,000 or more is far less than the number earning $88,000 or less. It would only be revenue neutral if the cap were less than the average salary.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson