This from the guy that got upset when I said that people that don't understand the First Ammendment need a remedial reading lesson. Your descriptions of your opinion are much more personal attacks than that, for one thing they're aimed at me and for another they're insulting and rude, mine wasn't aimed at you and was a simple statement of truth.
But again you go on and on and on and on with the silly red herrings. Do you have any proof that Frank was arrested for the sole reason of protesting? Yet.
Ya see? This is inane. Shrill. And Obtuse.
I have never claimed anything that you imply. The article stands on it's own merit. You can believe it or not. I have no information that shows it to be incorrect, therefore I only have commented on the info available. If you want me to prove a negative, on something I never asserted, you will be waiting a long time. That line of argument is inane.