Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: qam1
The report ... describes these women as princess-style "domestic divas" who effectively exploit their husbands.

Oh, come on! What tiny percentage of families can afford a nanny, a cleaning service, and all the activities and accessories of a social-ornament wife? Maybe there are just enough to make it worthwhile advertising at these big-spending ladies, and the husbands who CHOOSE to finance this kind of lifestyle.

I know lots of homeschooling families with 5-10 kids, one income. I think all our husbands would be happy if we could afford more help, so that they didn't find their wives exhausted, sweaty, and ready to drink cleaning solvents at the end of the day.

Yes, I'm exaggerating a bit (about the cleaning solvents; my poison of choice is pink wine in a box,) but I think many husbands would be happy to pay a little money (if they had any, after groceries) if it meant their wives would have a little energy left for *them*.

15 posted on 05/14/2004 7:45:29 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I can see you, but you can't see me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick
"I think many husbands would be happy to pay a little money (if they had any, after groceries) if it meant their wives would have a little energy left for *them*."

Safe to say! I pay for our full-time nanny, a housecleaner, and a yard guy. I'd much rather have pleasant time with my wife rather than hear moaning about her being tired.

Anyone who purchases a new car each year can do all of the above, too (simply by holding off on the car purchase).

86 posted on 05/14/2004 11:58:19 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson