Skip to comments.
Berg Died for Bush, Rumsfeld 'Sins' - Father
Reuters ^
| Thu, May 13, 2004
| Reuters
Posted on 05/13/2004 10:53:33 AM PDT by TSgt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321 next last
Then, referring to his son's executioners, he said: "They did not know what they were doing. They killed their best friend."
Nothing like politicizing your son's death.
His son was there on his own accord. Bush had nothing to do with it.
Savage is right, liberalism is a mental illness.
1
posted on
05/13/2004 10:53:33 AM PDT
by
TSgt
To: sauropod
ping
2
posted on
05/13/2004 10:54:39 AM PDT
by
cyborg
To: MikeWUSAF
I'm hearing that Berg's father is active in ANSWER? True?
3
posted on
05/13/2004 10:54:55 AM PDT
by
Fenris6
To: MikeWUSAF
This looks especially bad when you consider that the FBI warned Berg to leave Iraq, and now we learn that the US even offered to fly him out. He refused, and then was murdered.
What else would they have the gov't do?
4
posted on
05/13/2004 10:55:55 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: MikeWUSAF
"I am sure that he only saw the good in his captors until the last second of his life," Berg said. Then, referring to his son's executioners, he said: "They did not know what they were doing. They killed their best friend."
So his father is saying his son was a supporter of islamic terrorists, and even an terrorist himself.
May be time to rethink any sorrow people are having for his loss.
5
posted on
05/13/2004 10:56:08 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: Fenris6
That is my understanding. The link is running around on one of these threads.
6
posted on
05/13/2004 10:56:13 AM PDT
by
TSgt
(What have you done for your country today?)
To: Fenris6
this berg is a maggot!
7
posted on
05/13/2004 10:56:19 AM PDT
by
rrrod
To: MikeWUSAF
Then, referring to his son's executioners, he said: "They did not know what they were doing. They killed their best friend." Evidently not.
8
posted on
05/13/2004 10:56:20 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: MikeWUSAF
What an asshole... dancing on the corpse of his son to promote his own beliefs! His own son would have disagreed with him!
9
posted on
05/13/2004 10:56:31 AM PDT
by
Lunatic Fringe
(John F-ing Kerry??? NO... F-ING... WAY!!!)
To: Fenris6
True.
10
posted on
05/13/2004 10:56:48 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: cyborg; Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Thank you.
11
posted on
05/13/2004 10:56:49 AM PDT
by
sauropod
("I am Locutus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will service US.")
To: MikeWUSAF
This is the sickest thing I have ever read. Michael Berg is NUTS. He exploits his own son's disgusting untimely vicious death to make his own political points. This is UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!
12
posted on
05/13/2004 10:57:16 AM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(Free Terri Schiavo!!!)
To: Fenris6
Yes. He was a speaker at one of their rallies as exposed on another thread.
13
posted on
05/13/2004 10:57:44 AM PDT
by
sauropod
("I am Locutus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will service US.")
To: r9etb
Wanna bet Michael Berg gets offered to appear at the DNC in Boston this July? Guess who REALLY politizes everything? the 800 number for the DNC is DIAL-A-VICTIM!
To: MikeWUSAF
It's probably a pretty heavy burden - they filed suit to get him released, and he was released into the arms of his murderers. There's probably
some degree to which guilt is driving him crazy.
Assuming the story as we've gotten it is true, of course. It seriously doesn't add up, but I don't know what that means.
15
posted on
05/13/2004 10:58:27 AM PDT
by
prion
To: MikeWUSAF
"They did not know what they were doing. They killed their best friend."
Ahhh I get it...perhaps his son was over there carrying out ANSWER's work. Not to disparage so soon, but was this another episode of "Anti-war Activist Meets Reality?"
16
posted on
05/13/2004 10:58:45 AM PDT
by
Fenris6
To: Saundra Duffy
... or perhaps Mr. Berg is insane with grief ...
17
posted on
05/13/2004 10:58:47 AM PDT
by
glennaro
To: MikeWUSAF
He only saw the good in his captors? At what point? When they tied him up? When they captured him at gunpoint (or knifepoint, or whatever)? What a ridiculous statement.
18
posted on
05/13/2004 10:59:01 AM PDT
by
LanPB01
To: Phantom Lord
That is what these kooks don't understand.
It doesn't matter if he was a terrorist supporter, a peacenik anti-war maggot or a proud patriotic American.
He was an AMERICAN. And that is why they slaughtered him. And they will slaughter all of us if we let them.
19
posted on
05/13/2004 10:59:13 AM PDT
by
TSgt
(What have you done for your country today?)
To: Fenris6
Refresh my memory -- what is ANSWER?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson