[Capt. Tom]

I don't think women belong in combat, or in "coed" prisons. It's just asking for trouble.

The purpose of putting women in the service in these siuations is paying dividends for the America hating socialists who pushed this agenda during the Clinton years..

The first thing Clinton did as president was to allow homosexuals to stay in the military. Also GI Jane was pioneered and now we are paying the price.

What the army wants are heterosexual males in their late teens and early twenties who are in god physical shape.

There is a reason the armed services never wanted gays and women near front line combat. There is enough of a problem fighting a war without these other distractions. - Tom

[AFPhys]

There is a reason the armed services never wanted gays and women near front line combat. There is enough of a problem fighting a war without these other distractions. - Tom

YES, YES, YES!!!

.

[Chief_Joe]

What the army wants are heterosexual males in their late teens and early twenties who are in god physical shape.

There is a reason the armed services never wanted gays and women near front line combat. There is enough of a problem fighting a war without these other distractions. - Tom

This is the big picture I don't believe many take seriously enough. We don't have unlimited resources to accomplish military missions, so we have to field the best units possible for the military to complete its objectives. Integrating women into many of these units is inefficient at best, but they usually are a complete negative because they lower the combat readiness of the unit, and they breakdown the strong order and discipline that is needed for units to carry out their missions. I think it is best now to release at least a few of the pictures of Lynndie having sex with multiple partners to put an end to the nonsense that she was following orders or was working with MI to get intelligence from the Iraqi captives.  Real military people know these individuals who did this are sh@th#*ds, and the military does not want, need, or support sh@th#*ds like these in its ranks.

[WOSG]

The purpose of putting women in the service in these siuations is paying dividends for the America hating socialists who pushed this agenda during the Clinton years.. The first thing Clinton did as president was to allow homosexuals to stay in the military. Also GI Jane was pioneered and now we are paying the price. What the army wants are heterosexual males in their late teens and early twenties who are in god physical shape. There is a reason the armed services never wanted gays and women near front line combat. There is enough of a problem fighting a war without these other distractions. - Tom

What we have seen clearly is that certain pats of the Democratic party (ie most of it) IS NOT INTERESTED IN USA WINNING WARS. If they had an ounce of patriotism, they wouldnt be spreading the doom, defeatism and despair that they do. this is a perfect way to lose a war.

So clearly, they have another agenda. This is probably why they wont budge on women in combat. DoD as a social experiment and wedge issue is far far more important to them then the military as a fighting force.

[Trinity_Tx]

I said:
"I don't think women belong in combat, or in "coed" prisons. It's just asking for trouble."

You replied:
"The purpose of putting women in the service in these siuations is paying dividends for the America hating socialists who pushed this agenda during the Clinton years.."

Yup. I don't think the goal was necessarily to destroy the military, (as someone else accused) but to generally push the whole idea of equality to ludicrous extremes... With that being their primary goal, they didn't worry themselves about the impact of their social engineering on something as bourgeois as our military.

They're motivated by the same sort of selfishness as the little girl or boy who insists on crashing the neighborhood "girls only" or "boys only" club. You're right... it's a psychological (as opposed to economical) socialism. Kinda like grade inflation to keep everyone feeling equal and cozy.

"What the army wants are heterosexual males in their late teens and early twenties who are in god physical shape."

; ) That's seriously mighty physical shape.

"There is a reason the armed services never wanted gays and women near front line combat. There is enough of a problem fighting a war without these other distractions. - Tom"

Exactly.