LEASH GAL'S SEX PIX

New York Post ^ | 5/13/04 | VINCENT MORRIS and DEBORAH ORIN

[kattracks]

May 13, 2004 -- WASHINGTON - Shocking shots of sexcapades involving Pfc. Lynndie England were among the hundreds of X-rated photos and videos from the Abu Ghraib prison scandal shown to lawmakers in a top-secret Capitol conference room yesterday.

"She was having sex with numerous partners. It appeared to be consensual," said a lawmaker who saw the photos.

[weegee]

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who also characterized the photos as "disgusting," agreed, noting, "It's hard to believe that this actually is taking place in a military facility."

Lying c***.

Now she is claiming the same rage that America citizens expressed when we learned that President Bill Clinton had a sexual affair (that wasn't sex) with an unpaid college intern in the Oval Office of the White House.

Bill Clinton had oral sex with Monica Lewinsky while he was on the phone deploying troops. Isn't it offensive when the commander in chief is toying with mens' lives while receiving an act of sodomy from someone who was not his wife?

We were told that it was a private matter. Except that it happend while Bill Clinton was on the clock, while he was actively "working", while he was discussing matters of national security in the presence of someone who did not have that clearance.

We are also aware of how much effort the Clinton White House was spending to cover the tracks (and intimidate witnesses) who knew of this affair. Maybe if Bill Clinton had been more focused on his job (even before the impeachment trial) we wouldn't have lost 3,000 citizens on 9.11.2001.

All of this crap from the left has at least motivated me to finally create a profile page.

[Oberon]

That is a cute pic. What species?

That bird, my friend, is the legendary Hairy-Chested Nutscratcher. It used to be more common than it is now, but it is still by no means rare.

[Trinity_Tx]

Yup. Perfect example.

FWIW, I honestly don't think what consensual adults do in private is any of my business.

It's just that too many are making it my business by either publicizing it (Gay agenda, Super Bowl pranks, sick e-mail, network TV), allowing their urges to hinder their job performance, or degrading the image of our military.

[js1138]

The California porn industry brings in as much money as the rest of the movie industry. How can a senator from California be shocked?

[VadeRetro]

That bird, my friend, is the legendary Hairy-Chested Nutscratcher.

Don't know about the chest, but the back is remarkable.

[L.N. Smithee]

Presuming this is true, I can't wait to see her friends and family twist themselves into curly fries trying to spin it.

[Trinity_Tx]

I said:
"I don't think women belong in combat, or in "coed" prisons. It's just asking for trouble."

You replied:
"The purpose of putting women in the service in these siuations is paying dividends for the America hating socialists who pushed this agenda during the Clinton years.."

Yup. I don't think the goal was necessarily to destroy the military, (as someone else accused) but to generally push the whole idea of equality to ludicrous extremes... With that being their primary goal, they didn't worry themselves about the impact of their social engineering on something as bourgeois as our military.

They're motivated by the same sort of selfishness as the little girl or boy who insists on crashing the neighborhood "girls only" or "boys only" club. You're right... it's a psychological (as opposed to economical) socialism. Kinda like grade inflation to keep everyone feeling equal and cozy.

"What the army wants are heterosexual males in their late teens and early twenties who are in god physical shape."

; ) That's seriously mighty physical shape.

"There is a reason the armed services never wanted gays and women near front line combat. There is enough of a problem fighting a war without these other distractions. - Tom"

Exactly.

[hattend]

So, Senators Kennedy & Clinton, let me get this straight, this is a crime because it DIDN'T happen in the Oval Office?

I'd pay money to hear an answer from either one of them.

"Uh...well...um...well, you know...uh...Hey, why are you questioning my patriotism?!!!"

[Rebelbase]

I'm going at it with a Lib on another board who claims Rumsfeld said that the prison abuse against the Iraqi's included rape and murder.

I have not heard that nor found any info here...anyone hear that?

[Trinity_Tx]

Not I. The pics of rape were proved to be fakes days ago. I haven't heard anyone claim prisoners were murdered.

What other forum? Freepmail it to me if you want to, lol.
I've been reading two others myself. Just haven't had the nerve to speak up.

[Trinity_Tx]

Thank you. I cannot imagine having to do it as a single mother. And really, home schooling is less a battle than the homework was becoming. 4 hours fresh is a lot easier than 2 after he's already worn out from a day a school.

[Trinity_Tx]

Yes, I was referring to the Nation of Islam. Someone told me the other day that they read an article about the increasing #s of Black men serving time being converted into it. Apparently, the "problem" is that it seeds anti-American ideas in the war against Islam.

I don't know.

[boxsmith13]

I am actually not surprised. I have noticed a very non-chalant attitude by college age people concerning porn.

Remember the Indian U porn story back in 2002?

Also I told my friends that web sites like "BangBus" make debauchary and filth and easy sex seem just normal.

[Politicalmom]

I think it is a terrible idea.

Another reason I will never allow my daughters to be drafted....

[Libertina]

I would like to know the number of senators and congressmen/women who tramped over to gawk at the sex pix, but who REFUSED to look at the evidence against President Clinton. Yes, I would be very interested in knowing those number comparisons.

[mass55th]

One of the problems that has always been evident with the Muslim religion in New York prisons, is the fact the inmates have always been allowed to have privacy when holding their meetings and their services. As I said before, we were very lucky in having the civilian Imam that we did because he kept them all in line. There have been some troublemaker Imams on the payroll of the state however. Shortly after 9/11, I understand that one such troublemaker was tossed out of his job because of anti-American comments made. He was at one of the prisons on the western part of the state. From what I understand, there was staff in the audience and they wrote down his comments. I never really learned why staff was in the room at the time, since it has always been standard practice to let the Muslims alone when they gather.

The same thing goes for the NOI behind the walls. We were not privy to their meetings, and as far as their attending services, I'm not sure how many of them actually do since the organization is more of a racially biased gang than a religious group. Up until about two-three years ago, the NOI was not allowed inside the prison. I believe they won the right through a lawsuit. I'm sure their desire to enter the prisons to look for members goes along with the fact that most of the founders of the group are ex-cons. It doesn't surprise me that the number of convicts being converted into the NOI is increasing. There's alot of angry, young black men out there who are looking for a group that provides them with the same type of gang experience they were a part of on the street. Others join for protection.

[Colorado Doug]

Is it just me? or

Naw, couldn't be . . . could it?

[Colorado Doug]

Kenneth and Terrie England with daughter Lynndie England Dec. 22, 2003

Interesting date. Home with family for Christmas. Investigation began in January. She must have been a very busy girl.

[BykrBayb]

Yes, liberals are treading on thin ice when they use that same line of reasoning to claim that this is proof we shouldn't be in Iraq. They fail to admit that the majority of our troops, male and female, are honorable. They claim to support our troops, but then they use the rare occurrance of impropriety to paint all of our troops as war criminals, or all of our female troops as unfit for service. And then there are those with a 7th-century mindset, who think women are unfit for anything except serving men in whatever capacity the men dictate. People who refuse to recognize others for their accomplishments, and instead judge everyone based on race, gender, or other physical characteristics are extremely narrow minded. They will often ignore any and all facts that are contrary to their agenda. If a soldier is recognized for accomplishments rather than gender, that would mean that some women have accomplished more than some men, and we can't have that. Women must all be categorized as inferior to men. Another effect of this reasoning is that men who never accomplish anything can still be proud, because the only thing that really matters is their gender. When anyone (especially a woman, who is supposed to be subservient) points this out, it threatens the overblown value the man has placed upon his existence. It's really quite amusing. Men who actually accomplish something in life, don't have to live vicariously through other men's deeds, and rarely if ever resort to denying the accomplishments of others. When a man like that says he supports our troops, he doesn't mean just the white troops, or just the male troops. He means he supports our troops. There's more to being a good soldier than just being born with certain genitalia, or a certain skin color. Our troops do not accomplish their missions by sitting around admiring what the Good Lord blessed them with at birth. There's more to it than that. To suggest otherwise is an insult to all of our troops, and is no more supportive of our troops than any other means of undermining their mission.

[BykrBayb]

You need to do some research on what really goes on at the DMZ. Those fairy tales you've been reading are not accurate. Our soldiers really do go out on patrol in the DMZ. When they encounter North Koreans, do you think they sit down over a cup of tea and have a nice friendly chat? What exactly do you think is going on there? What do you think has prevented Seoul from being wiped off the map? Kind words from Kerry? Before you jump all over someone, and call men who have been there liars, you really should find out the truth. It's disheartening to see people claiming to support our troops on one hand, and on the other hand calling them liars for claiming there are patrols at the DMZ. You don't seem to mind them protecting your freedoms, so long as you don't have to admit that's what they're doing. It's a big world out there, and just because the media is focused on Iraq, doesn't mean the rest of our troops are sitting around admiring their manhood.