"The tests were reported by biomechanicist Frank Fish..."You just can't make this stuff up. Paul Harvey mentioned this today. I'm looking forward to seeing strange-looking wings on future aircraft.
1 posted on
05/12/2004 7:56:39 PM PDT by
FlyVet
To: FlyVet
This is just dying for some of the computer geniouses on this site to create an appropriate image.
2 posted on
05/12/2004 7:58:37 PM PDT by
Rokke
To: FlyVet
I'm not sure why this is such a big suprise, and I've wondered about it in the past...
It's long been known that long, smooth surfaces cause additional drag in laminar fluid flow.
That's why golfballs have the dimples. The balls fly farther than smooth ones.
Mark
3 posted on
05/12/2004 8:00:37 PM PDT by
MarkL
(The meek shall inherit the earth... But usually in plots 6' x 3' x 6' deep...)
To: FlyVet
Hae a good friend that was an F-4U pilot that shot down 2 Migs in Korea named Frank Fisch. It's not Fish, but close!
Along the lines of improving lift, drag, etc., i've had in the back of my mind for over 20 years that props should have winglets facing forward. The "Q" tip props weren't successful (facing backward) just as the droop tip Cessna wing wasn't successful, they turned it the wrong direction!
4 posted on
05/12/2004 8:18:48 PM PDT by
dalereed
(,)
To: FlyVet
I would venture a guess that these tubercles would not work so good at higher speeds. They might work well for Pipers, slower aircraft but probably not so good on airliners or fighters.
5 posted on
05/12/2004 8:19:27 PM PDT by
El Gran Salseron
(It translates as the Great, Big Salsa Dancer, nothing more. :-))
To: FlyVet
I don't like this for one reason, whales don't fly.
6 posted on
05/12/2004 8:23:57 PM PDT by
Pylon
(NSD 7-4-69 12-24-87)
To: FlyVet
Southwest's on the case.
![](http://www.shashell.com/images/Shamu3.jpg)
<|:)~
8 posted on
05/12/2004 8:27:03 PM PDT by
martin_fierro
(Action figure sold separately)
To: FlyVet
9 posted on
05/12/2004 8:38:45 PM PDT by
Reeses
To: FlyVet
1. We already know about tripping boundary layer turbulence to prevent on the onset of separation which both lowers lift and increases drag.
2. A wing designed to function like a whale may be good for very low speed incompressible flow wings. Unfortunately all commercial aircraft fly in a faster flow regime.
3. Why are we surprised that a creature that lives in the water has a body designed for swimming in water?
10 posted on
05/12/2004 8:39:29 PM PDT by
miner89
(Wherever you go, there you are)
To: FlyVet
11 posted on
05/12/2004 8:41:06 PM PDT by
Reeses
To: FlyVet
All our lives we were told the most important invention was the wheel; yet had we a knife first and the fruit of a citrus tree we would, through trial and error, have disclosed a wheel replete with spokes - but whence came the axle?
To: FlyVet
If they build it, I promise to try to fly it............FRegards
16 posted on
05/12/2004 8:53:30 PM PDT by
gonzo
(Hey, it's tough dealing with Tourettes Syndrome! So %$#@(*&+#$ and &$*&@# yer cat!)
To: FlyVet
Mimicking humpback whale flippers may improve airplane wing designAnd if we ever found out why those petunias said, "Oh no, not again," we'd understand the universe a lot more.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson