Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holden: Missouri soldiers shouldn't drive civilian contractors
STLToday.com ^ | 5/11/04 | Terry Ganey

Posted on 05/11/2004 5:22:18 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat

Edited on 05/11/2004 5:37:04 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

JEFFERSON CITY -- Gov. Bob Holden wrote President George W. Bush on Tuesday saying he was concerned about the use of Missouri National Guard soldiers to drive vehicles for civilian contractors in Iraq.

Holden said if they are, he strenuously objected to the "wrongful use of U.S. Army personnel in this manner."


(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; iraq; nationalguard; onetermbob; otb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2004 5:22:19 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
"Holden said if they are, he strenuously objected to the "wrongful use of U.S. Army personnel in this manner."

Well, governor, I don't think that's your call.

2 posted on 05/11/2004 5:26:14 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Why is any military personnel being used to drive
civilian contractors around?

why don't the civilian contractors hire civilian contractors for this task?
3 posted on 05/11/2004 5:31:25 PM PDT by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
If they are performing logistics work for the military then it's nothing unusual.
4 posted on 05/11/2004 5:32:17 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Well, now I believe I've seen it all. Every RAT of every dimension will insert itself into this conflict.
5 posted on 05/11/2004 5:35:13 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I disagree, I have no problem with the military providing
on site security on a case by case basis but not to provide a service such as a personal gofer.

These civilians ain't there for patriotic reasons. They are there for them or their company to make a profit. No way our military should assist them on a complimentary level.
6 posted on 05/11/2004 5:37:02 PM PDT by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
Gasp! Are you insinuated that this was nothing but politics?
7 posted on 05/11/2004 5:38:05 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
Psssst. If they are there performing logistics work for the military, they are there for military reasons.
8 posted on 05/11/2004 5:39:42 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat; rface
Gov. Bob Holden (DEMOCRAT)wrote President George W. Bush on Tuesday
saying he was concerned about the use of Missouri National Guard soldiers to
drive vehicles for civilian contractors in Iraq.


As if that needed to be pointed out.
The DemocRATs are determined to back-stab every effort in Iraq.
I guess they are having fun with LSD flashbacks of how they deep-sixed South Vietnam.
So this is their last hurrah before the old-folks home.
9 posted on 05/11/2004 5:43:41 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
"Holden said if they are, he strenuously objected to the "wrongful use of U.S. Army personnel in this manner.""

Governor Holden needs to get a real job and stay out of the affairs of our military.
10 posted on 05/11/2004 5:44:44 PM PDT by Smartass ( BUSH & CHENEY IN 2004 - THE BEST GET BETTER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Psst...the article doesn't in any way suggest that. You don think that Brown & Root haven't soak us taxpayers enough to hire their own flunkies?
11 posted on 05/11/2004 5:44:47 PM PDT by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
LOL @ the irony of the ad immediately following the article:

"Join the National Guard - Serve in your own backyard"

12 posted on 05/11/2004 5:44:54 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Veni Vidi Velcro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Hey Bob....STFU!

How about dealing with Mizzorah's pertinent STATE issues rather than national security and war policy?

With any luck at all (and with any semblance of intellignece by the MO voters), OTB will be writing George Bush letters as a working stiff citizen in 5 months.
13 posted on 05/11/2004 5:45:40 PM PDT by Ethrane ("semper consolar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
"Psst...the article doesn't in any way suggest that."

Psssst...the article doesn't deny that.

14 posted on 05/11/2004 5:46:18 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
The contractors are there because the military is paying them to accomplish some task. Most probably, the contract includes provisions for the civilians to travel with military convoys for security; as well as secured areas in military camps for the contractors to establish their living space. I know it was done that way in Afghanistan, the Balkans, and Somalia. The National Guard soldiers from Missouri that the governor was complaining about are truck drivers--it is normal for them to be transporting or travelling with contractors who are performing functions in support of the Army.

Of note, almost all of the Union Army logistics in the Civil War was provided by contractors. It was standard to dedicate substantial amounts of Union troops to secure their activities.

15 posted on 05/11/2004 5:47:05 PM PDT by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
It doesn't mention logistics at all. That's just something you pulled out of whatever.
16 posted on 05/11/2004 5:47:48 PM PDT by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
If you were to hear tell of a member of the National
Guard (military) driving the Governor (civilian)around
would you feel the same way? In my state the SHP(civilian)
handles that task.
17 posted on 05/11/2004 5:52:53 PM PDT by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dwilli
Just go back to your world and not to worry...adults are in change. Thankfully.

But I'm sure your governor appreciates your support.

18 posted on 05/11/2004 5:53:46 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
If they are there performing logistics work for the military, they are
there for military reasons.


Easy enough to connect the dots.
Some Democratic activist parents have learned that Junior is driving some KBR
contract workers around.
Thus the attack on Dubya, via the tortuous route of KBR to parent company Halliburton,
thence to Cheney (formerly of Halliburton).

Only suprising thing...it took a Democratic Governor this long to do his part
of the DNC's plan to f---up the efforts to help Iraq into civilization.

Gotta' tip the hat to the DNC and Holden on this end-around play!
19 posted on 05/11/2004 5:56:35 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
In the future If I sign on as General Dwilli, would you be impressed and salute me?
20 posted on 05/11/2004 5:57:09 PM PDT by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson