Skip to comments.
Seven killed in SUV crash (Vehicle of death alert)
AP ^
| Monday, May 10, 2004
Posted on 05/11/2004 10:01:19 AM PDT by presidio9
A rented SUV was speeding at more than 90 mph when it clipped a car it was trying to pass and veered out of control, killing seven people inside, including four young children, authorities said.
The Ford Explorer went airborne, slammed into trees in the median of Interstate 95 and landed on its roof. The accident happened Sunday about 10 miles west of Bangor in south-central Maine.
Two women and a child died when they were thrown from the SUV, while its other four occupants -- a woman and three children -- died inside. Troopers initially thought five people died, but two additional bodies were found when the SUV was lifted, authorities said.
The victims were from South Portland, and four of the children were 8 or younger, said Stephen McCausland, a spokesman for the state Department of Public Safety.
Killed were Kelley Armstrong, 28, and her 4-year-old son; Danielle St. Paulin, 29, and her three children; and Hope Gagnon, 29. St. Paulin's children ranged in age from 4 to 8.
The Explorer was rented from Hertz at the Portland International Jet Port earlier in the day.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Maine
KEYWORDS: suvs; vehicleofdeath
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-152 next last
1
posted on
05/11/2004 10:01:20 AM PDT
by
presidio9
To: presidio9
It's sad.
It's also disgusting to see the left continually use the deaths of people to further their agenda. Why else would we continually see articles such as this implicate the vehicle as the perpetrator of such accidents?
2
posted on
05/11/2004 10:04:03 AM PDT
by
kenth
To: presidio9
These SUVs seem to have minds of their own!
3
posted on
05/11/2004 10:04:22 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
To: presidio9
Another one of those 'wild and crazy' SUV's.
No mention of a driver - thank god nobody was driving it when it went wild - would have been another casualty. /sarcasm
4
posted on
05/11/2004 10:04:38 AM PDT
by
GaltMeister
(This is not my tagline. My family has it. The tagline belongs to my family.)
To: presidio9
At a speed in excess of 90 miles per hour, any vehicle would have suffered the same consequences. Why bother to even mention the term 'SUV'?
5
posted on
05/11/2004 10:06:40 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
To: presidio9
I saw this on Foxnews last night. Witnesses said the driver was driving on the emergency lane at 90+.
To: kenth
This accident happened in Maine. CNN has it on their national news front page. I said a prayer for this family, but I can't help wondering whether they would have survived if they were traveling in a car. But then CNN would presumably not considered this to be a major news story. Seems to me that the 90mph speed was the main contributor to their deaths.
7
posted on
05/11/2004 10:07:40 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
To: presidio9
CNN. Consider the source.
To: presidio9
I have had 5 SUVs in my life, I have never driven that fast in one. I am not comfortable in an SUV at near that speed.
To: Rummyfan
The reason of SUV drivers cruising at a high speed is because the drivers sit HIGH above the road. They have a distorted impression of their speed. There is no 'ground effect' as in a low sports car.
And besides that they feel invulnerable.
10
posted on
05/11/2004 10:09:52 AM PDT
by
traumer
To: TommyDale
And you don't get thrown from a vehicle if you're wearing a belt, either.
To: presidio9
>A rented SUV was speeding at more than 90 mph when it veered out of control, killing seven people inside, including four young children, authorities said.<
Well, I guess it did, seeing that the dang fool driving it was SPEEDING at 90 MPH!!!!!
Liberals, gotta love 'em.
To: SeeRushToldU_So
Witnesses said the driver was driving on the emergency lane at 90+. On a suspended license.
To: traumer
Helloooo!
The reason 7 were killed in an SUV is that there's no passenger car sold today that will HOLD 7 people!
You want to pin responsibility on someone? Other than the fool driving 90 with a car load of kids?
Try blaming the Congress that passed CAFE, thus sentencing Americans with families to buy trucks to transport them in.
14
posted on
05/11/2004 10:13:30 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: presidio9
90mph?
some real irresponsible adults with 4 children in their care!
15
posted on
05/11/2004 10:14:16 AM PDT
by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
To: presidio9
It is a simple fact that in accidents involving SUV's the mortality rate is higher both for those in the SUV and for those in the other vehicles. No amount of spin will change that fact. SUV's flip when a minivan or car would not.
I know this from personal experience. Last summer on I-20 coming home to Texas from Georgia I was in a minivan with 3 friends. I was driving, and I was passing a truck at about 75 with cruise control on. He decided to move over quickly and without warning when we were halfway past him. He hit us and knocked us into the median, the airbag went off and I lost control of the vehicle. We made an almost 90 degree left turn, crossed the median and the other side of the highway, and slammed into the upsloping ground on the other side. The van was totaled, but the worst injury any of us had was some glass embedded in one persons arm. If we had been in an SUV, it would have flipped and we would be dead now.
Unless you are doing real farm work, in which case you would have a truck, or are going off road, there is nothing that an SUV does that a minivan doesn't do better. If you want to drive an SUV, that is fine, there is absolutely nothing I can do about it, and I am not proposing that the goverment do anything about it. Next time we have to make nice to Saudi Arabia you will know why.
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: presidio9
The driver was the cause of this accident. The reports I have seen said the speeding vehicle tried to pass 2 other vehicles (1 in each lane, travel & passing) using the 'break down' lane. The speeding vehicle in the break down lane swerved into one of the other cars and lost control. Poor, really poor driver judgement caused this tradgedy. I wonder if the driver had any experience with an SUV prior to renting this one.
To: Darnright
This woman had no license (she had lost it because of violations), was driving 90 mph passing 2 cars on the right hand side (breakdown lane), clipped one of the cars which was legally in the left lane passing the other vehicle in the right lane, and lost control. There were no child seats in the vehicle, only 2 of the people were in a seatbelt, and in the article I read, she had a great love of race car driving. Of course, it could have been worse. The car she clipped was not damaged, and the driver of that car was not injured. She was a stupid, stupid driver...
To: traumer
That's why soda can drivers drive too slow, they have a distorted impression of their lack of speed. Besides, they feel self righteous in their feeling of vulnerability.
20
posted on
05/11/2004 10:26:25 AM PDT
by
Dead Dog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-152 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson