Skip to comments.
Hackworth To Release Names Of 17 Senators on Internet Today
Posted on 05/10/2004 5:51:58 AM PDT by Bubbette
Just heard on KVIl in Dallas, Col. Hackworth being interviewed. Stated he will be releasing the names of the notorious 17 today on the internet. FYI
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: getoutofmysidebar; hackworth; iraqipow; newsbreakswefixit; thinkshesethelmermen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 401-418 next last
To: Bubbette
To: Bubbette
We need to start a pool -- how many Pubbies will end up losing their jobs over this?
It seems anytime a scandal happens, whether Dem or Pubbie, only Pubbies end up losing their jobs.
I figure this will be .... 3 Pubbies within the next 2 weeks.
82
posted on
05/10/2004 6:15:48 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: Nakatu X
I couldn't find a list of the senators ordered by conservative ideology, but I did find this:
http://voteview.uh.edu/sen108.htm So, taking McCain out of the equation, the Senators that will be accused will be:
SOUTH C R GRAHAM
KENTUCK R BUNNING
IDAHO R CRAIG
IDAHO R CRAPO
OKLAHOM R INHOFE
TEXAS R CORNYN
WYOMING R ENZI
VIRGINI R ALLEN
NEW HAM R GREGG
WYOMING R THOMAS
ALABAMA R SESSIONS
PENNSYL R SANTORUM
NEW HAM R SUNUNU
COLORAD R ALLARD
NEVADA R ENSIGN
ARIZONA R KYL
OKLAHOM R NICKLES, DO
83
posted on
05/10/2004 6:16:11 AM PDT
by
Nataku X
(Kerry's Entire Campaign: Bush bad. Medals good. Bush bad.)
To: Dave S
Wrong. The whistleblewer slipped a CD under the door of his CO. Others may have done what you said but the whistleblower went public in January. Exactly correct. The blackmailer and his buddy, Hackworth, went public recently. Ivan "Chip" Frederick got caught, his Uncle Bill tried to blackmail the military by threatening to expose the whole deal to the public. The military would not look the other way for Chippy boy so Lawson started shopping his story around and found a taker in Hackworth.
To: Grut
Why shouldn't they be listed if they failed to act? Who's saying they shouldn't be listed? Name them all! I'd like to know who had a heads up as well.
85
posted on
05/10/2004 6:17:47 AM PDT
by
Quilla
(God bless America, President George W. Bush, our brave troops, and Freepers everywhere.)
To: conservative in nyc
How can you prove you sent a letter unless you have the Post Office's security film? For the matter, how can senators prove that they DIDN'T receive the letters?
In releasing those pictures straight to the media, Hackworth made a concious decision to HARM the military. I will not put anything beyond him.
86
posted on
05/10/2004 6:18:32 AM PDT
by
Nataku X
(Kerry's Entire Campaign: Bush bad. Medals good. Bush bad.)
To: rintense
Wonder if this is why Kerry has been virtually silent on this. He has been silent because he can sit back and watch other do his bidding on this one.
87
posted on
05/10/2004 6:19:44 AM PDT
by
TankerKC
(R.I.P. Spc Trevor A. Win'E American Hero)
To: rintense
"Hack is in league with the Kerry camp."
So glad someone finally brought that up. Even back when W was going to UN about Iraq, HACKWORTH WAS ALL OVER THE TUBE BASHING THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION. He has always seemed like a "kook" to me!
88
posted on
05/10/2004 6:20:00 AM PDT
by
whadizit
To: hellinahandcart
Just in case you were wondering, the worst typo I have ever seen here was "superannuated nuclear teaty" I saw one that beats that but I don't know if it qualifies. This was an honest to goodness AP headline posted by John Huang II.
Texas Families Asses Blast Damage
(Should have been Texas Families Assess Blast Damage).
89
posted on
05/10/2004 6:20:16 AM PDT
by
ProudGOP
To: Mr. K
Add another perplexed freeper.
Notorious exactly why?
The registered communists? Socialist? Husband beaters? What?
90
posted on
05/10/2004 6:20:46 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(I don't do diplomacy either.)
To: Rebelbase
Its the predictable outcome of the 2 Party system. Everybody wants thier "side" to win at all costs, so they'll forgive whatever transgressions their "side" is a part of. If you're a professional politician, you couldn't ask for a better set up.
91
posted on
05/10/2004 6:21:59 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: libbytarian
John F. Kerry?
92
posted on
05/10/2004 6:22:02 AM PDT
by
ShandaLear
(Vote Quagmire...Vote Kerry!!!)
To: conservative in nyc
I've heard that it was Lawrence, then that it was Fredericks. I corrected - I thought - "Lawrence" to "Fredericks" yesterday in my notes on this fiasco. SHEESH! And what website is he going to publish them on?
93
posted on
05/10/2004 6:22:27 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: rintense
Wonder if this is why Kerry has been virtually silent on this.Kerry is walking on eggshells here because HE himself admitted to committing "war crimes."
To: airborne
A family member of one of those charged in the abuse investigation stated that they wrote to 17 members of Congress in January about what was going on, but never got a response from a single person in DC.That's not unusual. And, one would most likely only receive a reply from the senators that represent the state they are living in...
Plus with all the problems with the mail in DC, they are probably hung up in some quarantined area......
95
posted on
05/10/2004 6:23:32 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.)
To: rintense
Wonder if this is why Kerry has been virtually silent on this.
Maybe he's on the list. He had basically locked up the nomination at that point- late Dec early Jan. If someone wanted to make trouble for leadership than Kerry would be a good bet. Who better to tell war atrocities to than one who has already committed them?
96
posted on
05/10/2004 6:23:47 AM PDT
by
Republican Red
("I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it,")
To: Nakatu X
For the matter, how can senators prove that they DIDN'T receive the letters?
Any member of Congress worth anything should keep a file of all letters sent and received by his or her office (or at least a log of who sent the letters). Not to do otherwise would be foolish, since it would open then up to unsubstantiated attacks of being non-responsive to constituent concerns.
Hackworth better tread carefully here if he thinks he will get away with accusing congresscritters falsely. It's an election year for most. They will bite back.
To: SeeRushToldU_So
"I wonder if this was what Rush was talking about Friday?"Probably. All of us who missed Rush to hear all of the testimony said it too.
98
posted on
05/10/2004 6:25:23 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Wolfie
THAT will be an interesting list of names.
99
posted on
05/10/2004 6:26:19 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
To: WVNan
Careful. If Hackworth is the one releasing the names they may all be Republicans. I would not be surprised if Hack did that ..
100
posted on
05/10/2004 6:26:33 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 401-418 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson