[stylin_geek]

My oldest daughter has a top secret security clearance, and even if I had one, unless I was working in her department, she is not allowed to tell me anything about her work. "Need to know" only.

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, especially if her supposed cover was that important.

[My oldest daughter]

My oldest daughter has a top secret security clearance, and even if I had one, unless I was working in her department, she is not allowed to tell me anything about her work. "Need to know" only.

Daaaadddiiiie! You blew my cover!

[ampat]

Need to know is right. A fourth date doesn't constitute "need to know". Seems she blew, no pun intended, her own cover, and perhaps she should be disciplined.

[AFPhys]

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard, especially if her supposed cover was that important.

This gal is undoubtedly one of the most abusive "undercover" agents I've ever heard of. Her revealing her "undercover identity", was IN ITSELF, compromising secret information.

Dandi is right: there is NO leeway given to people regardless of their relationship. I never even thought of revealing to my wife the Secret and TS information I was privy to while I was in the AF - and in fact, to this day I have not discussed it with anybody, even though much of what I "knew" as TS has been publicized in the media.

gunnedah is right in wondering just how many others this broad had revealed this to. She is probably a disaster who ought to be prosecuted. It is a very good thing that someone found out her identity and published it before she could do even more damage.