Skip to comments.
Judge says outdoor urinating no reason for search
Bay City Times ^
| May 7 2004
| Crystal Harmon
Posted on 05/07/2004 7:54:13 PM PDT by msuMD
If a man relieves his bladder in the deep woods in the dark of night, when he thinks there's no one around, is it still indecent exposure? And does it give law officers a reason to search his car?
No, a federal judge has ruled.
U.S. District Judge David M. Lawson has thrown out evidence in a federal case against Donald Whitmore, 50, of Mio.
The judge ruled that a forest ranger did not have just cause to search the vehicle Whitmore was driving even though she "observed the defendant answering an urgent call of nature, alfresco."
(Excerpt) Read more at mlive.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airport; bang; banglist; billofrights; donutwatch; libertarians; news; privacy; privacylist; rights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: Travis McGee
yep.....trash is building up.
21
posted on
05/09/2004 12:51:49 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(This is it. We either win and prevail or we lose and get tossed into that dustbin W mentioned!)
To: Travis McGee
Hey... be of good cheer. I recently swayed a wayward "citizens don't need to carry concealed weapons" police officer over to the fold the other day.
Soon I'll have him buying one of your books.
To: MARTIAL MONK; MeekOneGOP
Once, back in my wilder days, I was riding around with a bunch of yahoos in rural Texas. We stopped at a convenience store for more liquid refreshments, not knowing that the store had been robbed minutes before. It was pitch black out so one old cowboy wandered out into the lot behind the store to drain his lizard. Suddenly there were six cop cars surrounding him with six searchlights illuminating his activities and six cops with shotguns across the hood. He was left standing there with his hands in the air and his pride dangling in the breeze.
There was absolute silence while both sides tried to figure out just what the heck was going on. Suddenly there was a plaintive drawl that you could hear for blocks, "Gaaawwd, you folks take pissin' SERIOUS!
ROTFLMFAO!
23
posted on
05/09/2004 12:59:50 PM PDT
by
maxwell
(Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
To: msuMD
Jackbooted feminazi.
Why do we give these people guns and badges?
This has only been getting worse these days.
24
posted on
05/09/2004 1:07:59 PM PDT
by
Bon mots
To: Bon mots
Maybe someday no one will have guns and badges, and anybody can do anything they like. Maybe there will be no rules, regs, laws and guidelines.
Maybe then you, and others will be happy about all that.
Just maybe.
To: maxwell; MARTIAL MONK; Happy2BMe; devolve
26
posted on
05/09/2004 2:54:25 PM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is ONLY ONE good Democrat: one that has just been voted OUT of POWER ! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: MeekOneGOP; Happy2BMe; PhilDragoo; potlatch; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Travis McGee
How highs the water Momma?
27
posted on
05/09/2004 3:36:06 PM PDT
by
devolve
(................... (..........................Hello from Sunny South Florida!..................)
To: devolve
hehe ! I though it went something like:
28
posted on
05/09/2004 4:24:20 PM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is ONLY ONE good Democrat: one that has just been voted OUT of POWER ! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: MeekOneGOP
6' high 'n risin'
29
posted on
05/09/2004 4:38:49 PM PDT
by
devolve
(................... (..........................Hello from Sunny South Florida!..................)
To: Bon mots
Jackbooted feminazi. Why do we give these people guns and badges? This has only been getting worse these days.
U.S. Forest Service Officer Brandy Hill
Assistant U.S. Attorney Janet Parker
_________________________________________
I agree!
I am pleased these women were not in this picture.
These guys all carried guns and used the trees.
Women in the news.
To: B4Ranch
Did you see that in "Dumb and Dumber?"
31
posted on
05/09/2004 6:24:13 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Cap'n Crunch
You do good work Cap'n!
32
posted on
05/09/2004 6:24:45 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: B4Ranch
I could tell about a time about a cop and a bottle that didn't have beer in it. He had just poured it out and some splashed on his trousers when the wiseass driver said "Officer, you need to smell the bottle and verify it's alcohol content."
The driver passed all field tests and volunteered to go in for urine/blood testing which the officer refused. A week later the officer even shaved off his mustache because of the harrassment he was receiving from fellow officers.
33
posted on
05/09/2004 6:44:44 PM PDT
by
B4Ranch
( If everything appears to be going well, you obviously don't know what the hell is going on.)
To: Travis McGee
#33.....I'm goin braindead tonight.
34
posted on
05/09/2004 9:09:01 PM PDT
by
B4Ranch
( If everything appears to be going well, you obviously don't know what the hell is going on.)
To: coloradan
Say what?! Does that mean that I should have no expectation of privacy while visiting my parents at their house? (Meaning, a cop can search me while there?) Yepper.. That's what it means.. These prosecutors just interpreted it wrongly in this case, but your interpretation is, indeed, correct..
If authorities suspect someone (say, You) of participating in an illegal activity, (say, drug trafficking) and you are observed entering a 3rd party's residence, (say, your parent's home) they are authorized to enter and search the residence, and any / all occupants under "probable cause"...
( I believe this was an East Coast Federal Court's decision, but as a prior judgement, it stands up in court nationally.)
35
posted on
05/09/2004 10:13:11 PM PDT
by
Drammach
(The Wolves are at the Door... Hey, Kids! Your lunch is here!)
To: msuMD
stories like this really p*ss me off.........
36
posted on
05/09/2004 10:17:02 PM PDT
by
isom35
To: B4Ranch
That story really stinks.
;^)
37
posted on
05/09/2004 10:36:05 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: msuMD
Well that's a relief.
38
posted on
06/09/2004 6:08:24 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: msuMD
Driving while intoxicated with a loaded weapon in the front seat ...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson