Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary's path to the White House
The American Thinker ^ | May 7th, 2004 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 05/07/2004 7:36:39 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind

Hillary Clinton is ambitious, audacious, and fully capable of creating devious, multi-step strategies. Blindsiding her fervent opponents, she may yet shock the world and realize her longstanding ambition to win election as President -- in the year 2004. Doing so would only require her to use tactics which she and her husband have already perfected.

Small signs already indicate she and her husband are laying the foundations for a fascinating gambit which could land her in the Oval Office next year.

Step one requires her to obtain the nomination as Vice President on a John Kerry ticket. No less an authority than Dick Morris has already proclaimed his belief that the late June timing of publication of Bill Clinton’s memoirs is designed to demonstrate to Kerry that the Clintons are fully capable of – in the currently popular metaphor – sucking the oxygen out of his campaign, if they choose to use their hold on the media, the Democrats’ base, and the charisma chasm which separates Bill Clinton from John Kerry.

The Clintons long ago demonstrated a remarkable ability to quietly persuade other politicians to bend to their will. Remember that when Hillary decided to enter the race for one of New York’s Senate seats, she leapfrogged ahead of other New York Democrats, who graciously stepped-aside. Such self-sacrificing, polite-to-the-point-of-abnegation behavior has never previously been cited as a notable characteristic of New Yorkers.

Hillary is enough of a realist, and the wounds of the defeat of her health care plan are still fresh enough, that she recognizes her opponents are numerous, determined, and capable of playing hardball with her. Ruefully, she also recognizes that she is a lightning rod, and that her record contains enough conductive material standing high enough off the ground to allow her opponents to seriously damage her in a Presidential campaign. She also probably recognizes that her own talents as a campaigner are limited enough that a long, drawn-out Presidential race might not come out the way she wishes.

Running as Vice President, Hillary would still attract attacks from her enemies, but she would be fully capable of mobilizing her formidable talents as an attack dog, while also playing the victim card, as a poor female target of sexists who do not want to see a woman get ahead on politics. How much damage could she do as presiding officer of the Senate, anyway?

More importantly, enemy fire would be concentrated at the top of the ticket. Senator John Kerry, whatever his talents in winning the favor of wealthy women, appears to lack the ability to connect with a large segment of the electorate. Haughty, aristocratic, liberal, and sporting an Irish-sounding name, Kerry never had to face the kind of flak in Massachusetts which a Presidential run entails. To date, his abilities to handle the pressures of a Presidential race have dismayed his allies and delighted his enemies. Whispers about the need to replace him as a candidate are already being heard beyond the confines of the Democrats’ inner circle.

Hillary is extremely unlikely to want to displace Kerry as the choice of the Democrats’ convention in Boston, his home town. Not only would such a move trigger criticism of her pathological ambition, it would also place her personal lightning rod at the top of the tallest tree on the political golf course. So, if she follows the strategy being outlined here, look for her to graciously accept a “draft Hillary” movement for the Vice Presidential nomination of the Democrats.

Astute poll watchers have noted that Hillary is no lock for re-election to the Senate in 2006, if Rudy Giuliani (a man with his own Presidential ambitions) should run against her. There would be an element of self-protection at work in seeking the nomination as Vice President, as well, since a defeat in the 2006 Senate race would effectively end her chance at attaining the Presidency.

Step two in the plan would be to conscientiously run as a model Vice Presidential candidate -- in public. Her behavior in the Senate conclusively demonstrates that when it serves her career interests, Hillary can put her head down and do the humble hard work necessary to win the favor of others. She would ceaselessly campaign for the ticket, taking the secondary locales, visiting the county seats, junior high school gyms, and factory gates. Once you have courted upstate New York and won approval, despite Illinois and Arkansas roots, you can handle the duties of a candidate for veep.

Taking the attack role traditionally assigned to the second spot on the ticket comes naturally to her. The humble nature of her supporting role, in the secondary status on the ticket, would be a definite plus, in deflecting the awkward image of a power-mad pol.

She would always declare her loyalty to the top of the ticket. Hillary definitely knows how to stand by her man. In public.

But by October, many things can happen. Kerry may well be unable to master the persona of a man of the people. So far, he has given no sign of being able to do so. The Democrats’ core aches in its bones to defeat Bush. The difficulties in Iraq give them all the more reason to believe that it is time for a Democrat to occupy the Oval Office once more. If the perception continues that Kerry is so unappealing that he cannot win against Bush, no matter how bad the news from Iraq, he may well face considerable anger from the ranks-and-file, as well as the insider pros.

Here is where step three would kick-in. I cannot tell you how the actual conversation would go, but ex-Senator Robert Toricelli could probably remember a similar meeting vividly. Probably, it would involve what Lyndon Johnson used to call “reasoning together.” A scenario outlining the consequences of blowing this golden opportunity for a Democrat comeback would be painted, and it would not be a pretty one. We already know that FBI files exist on the subject of John F. Kerry, but we do not know all of their contents. Bill and Hillary Clinton, the former recipients of over 800 FBI files containing “raw data,” might very well know things which could be rather damaging to a defeated Presidential candidate, once he is back in the Senate, with a life still to live.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but Senator Kerry’s “quality of life” now depends on the continued goodwill of his second wife. The speedboat, the private jet, the $250 bespoke shirts, the $8000 bicycle, and most of all the effortless mastery of material desire are intoxicating, I am sure. When he was between wealthy wives, he found life on a mere Senator’s salary uncomfortable. As Susan Estrich delicately put his circumstances at the time, “He didn’t have a bed to sleep in.”

The Teresa factor might well make Senator Kerry uniquely vulnerable to “persuasion” and “reason” coming from uniquely well-informed sources. If his ambitions for the White House appear to be coming to naught, he may well decide that the silver medal of continued wealth is preferable to losing, if losing means losing his zillionaire lifestyle, too.

But a candidate for President does not simply step down a few weeks before the election. Tongues would certainly wag. However, Senator Kerry has a perfectly good potential reason for withdrawal. He is, let us not forget, a cancer survivor. A cancer survivor who has not made public his medical records.

If Senator Kerry were to suddenly announce that “on advice of his physicians” he is stepping down, to “save his life” because the “stress of campaigning” was “threatening his health,” who could raise an eyebrow more than millimeter or two? The memory of his predecessor in his Senate seat, Paul Tsongas has not been erased from the history books. After “beating cancer” and running for President unsuccessfully, Senator Tsongas subsequently lost his battle for survival.

Now, carefully consider step four.

Suddenly, with no warning, America faces the prospect of its first woman President. There is a wave of sympathy for Senator Kerry, and for his party, by extension. The nobility of his gesture wins him and the Democrats many points for statesmanship. Seamlessly, the wave of sympathy morphs into a wave of enthusiasm for Hillary, who can at last take America’s women to a new stage of political recognition.

And there are only three or so weeks for her enemies to do their worst. No time to resurrect scandals past. And no desire on the public’s part to relive the bad old days of Hillary-hating.

Have done her homework in step two, Hillary has said all the right things about tempering strength with wisdom, building bridges to allies, and being tough enough to deal with a hostile world, full of threats to our security. Hillary, tough enough to tenderize our enemies. A woman who has taken flak in her career, and been tough enough to soldier on, never giving-up.

The press would have a new, spectacularly interesting story to run with. Three weeks or so is just enough time to play it out to the max, but not enough time for a reaction to set in.

Hillary would win.

And she knows it.

Be afraid. Be very afraid.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beafraid; dropoutkerry; hillary; johnkerry; kerry; veep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Flatus I. Maximus
This thread needs a picture ~


21 posted on 05/07/2004 8:26:48 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind (We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
Never EVER underestimate the cunning or desire of a desperate power starved liberal!
22 posted on 05/07/2004 8:28:29 AM PDT by 100%FEDUP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: don'tbedenied; Mudboy Slim
Kerry has to voluntarily quit prior to the nomination for this to happen.

Yeah, but is that part of the plan? This morning on the Today Show, Lisa Myers did a report on the Kerry videos (1971, Meet the Press 2001) and did a comparison of what Kerry said both times. It wasn't flattering.

23 posted on 05/07/2004 8:28:52 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (To be willing to march into Hell, Boston and Chappauqua for a heavenly cause...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sticker
Kerry's life expectation would be the same has that of a beer at a frat party

He would probably last long enough to get past inauguration by a decent interval then his prostate cancer would come back and do him in, probably overnight. It's all in the autopsy and Foster's autopsist is still around, I think.

24 posted on 05/07/2004 8:32:13 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
...and the realization sinks in that Kerry's been just another useful idiot, lucky that nothing worse happened to him...hmmmmm. Could happen.

Remember that movie Body Heat--one of my favorite movies. What I liked most was the way it showed how unbelievably devious and manipulative it is possible for someone to be. Most people would not imagine that such could be possible, and, once all was accomplished, most people would not believe what had happened.

There are people just that smart, just that audacious, self-confident, and destined for success. They seem to have a sixth sense that leads them, and they "do...what is necessary" (to quote the movie).

It's possible.

25 posted on 05/07/2004 8:36:05 AM PDT by Savage Beast (My parents, grandparents, and greatgrandparents were all Democrats. My children are Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don'tbedenied
Dope smoking paranoia. The mechanics of changing the ballots in 50 states, the majority of which are controlled by the R's makes this some weird horror fantasy. Kerry has to voluntarily quit prior to the nomination for this to happen.

THere's been a lot of testing the waters on last minute ballot switches though hasn't there. If Hitlery could never win a normal fair general election for President, she needs to be given an unfair, illegal, emotionally charged, chaotic, inscrutible electoral opportunity.

Rippin

26 posted on 05/07/2004 8:44:56 AM PDT by Rippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
They seem to have a sixth sense that leads them, and they "do...what is necessary"...

There does seem to be something "other worldly" about Hil ~ can you say voodoo?

27 posted on 05/07/2004 8:45:58 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind (We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: don'tbedenied
I consider this scenario as fatally flawed. I don't think Hillary! believes that she has a chance to win in 2004. She wants Kerry to lose to clear the Democrat decks for her in 2008.

However, your comment about not being able to "change the ballots" that late in the process is incorrect. I remind you that Senator Eagleton withdrew as the nominated Veep under George McGovern, when it came out that Eagleton had had electroshock therapy. (The American public was not ready for a Veep who had been wired up to a car battery.)

R. Sargeant Shriver was then inserted as the Veep nominee by the Party. The Party duly notified the state officials. The ballots were then changed. And the ticket then appeared on all ballots (and crashed and burned in the election).

So, this is possible, but not probable.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Honesty Problems with Kerry and Gorelick: Pin the Truth on the Democrat."

28 posted on 05/07/2004 8:50:57 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rippin
Rippin: If Hitlery could never win a normal fair general election for President, she needs to be given an unfair, illegal, emotionally charged, chaotic, inscrutible electoral opportunity.

Actually, none of what the article posited would be legally problematic. If the Presidential nominee drops out or dies, the VP nominee takes his place. That said, it's pretty unlikely a Pres nominee would drop out if he had any chance of winning (and who doesn't always see himself as having a chance?). Of course, threats of ruining a daughter's wedding with fake lesbian photos apparently worked once, but JFK2 isn't mentally unbalanced like Perot.

29 posted on 05/07/2004 9:04:05 AM PDT by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
The object of this thread is currently sharpening her claws to use against Don Rumsfeld at his inquisition du jour.


30 posted on 05/07/2004 9:06:04 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind (We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
I still think that, just before the Dum convention, there will be a bombshell dropped on Kerry. This will be information so devestating that kerry will have to be dumped. ( His ego will never let him withdraw).

The Dums will suddenly be without a nominee. They will be looking for a savior who can beat that awful Bush.

Hillary will reluctantly step forward, and allow herself to be drafted.

This, of course, after tearfully accepting New Yorkers' release from her promise to serve the full six years of her Senate term.

For the good of the country, you know.

31 posted on 05/07/2004 9:13:16 AM PDT by snowtigger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 100%FEDUP
"Never EVER underestimate the cunning or desire of a desperate power starved liberal!"

Believe me, I don't. What I'm watching in this political "passion play" centers more on the methods and the means. We ALL KNOW Hilde-beast's motives and ambitions - that would have to be the world's worst-kept secret! (No matter how profuse she objects).
I enjoy reading the conspiracy theories as much as the next guy, but notice that there is little value in most of it (other than a well deserved blowing off steam).
When it comes to Hillary!, I firmly believe that we all should sleep with one eye open!
32 posted on 05/07/2004 9:27:05 AM PDT by rockrr ("If this were a perfect world, Democrats would just be a bad memory - like Typhoid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
And there are only three or so weeks for her enemies to do their worst.

...which is very little. Don't forget: there is 2 MONTHS before the election when her opponents are muted, thanks to McCain-Feingold. Infinite free time for her supporters (left-leaning news media outlets can promote her all they want), vs. official opponents scrabbling for what little "hard money" remains (nobody else is allowed to run political ads 60 days before the election, and the Supreme Court has upheld it).

33 posted on 05/07/2004 9:34:56 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
Isn't there another factor that could work in Hillary's favor if all the above occurs......something about an election law that forbids personal attacks 30-60(?) days prior to the election?
34 posted on 05/07/2004 9:40:49 AM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ride the whirlwind
>If Senator Kerry were to suddenly announce that “on advice of his physicians” he is stepping down,

Kerry won't step down
because that move would cut short
Hillary's own time.

As VP she'll get
eight years, then, as Prez, eight more.
That's sixteen, total . . .

35 posted on 05/07/2004 9:46:25 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
That's sixteen, total . . .

(Shudder) You do know how to scare a person!

36 posted on 05/07/2004 9:55:01 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind (We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2; american spirit
McCain-Feingold is a good point.
37 posted on 05/07/2004 9:56:48 AM PDT by ride the whirlwind (We can't let Kerry win - an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
"Lisa Myers did a report on the Kerry videos (1971, Meet the Press 2001) and did a comparison of what Kerry said both times."

I wouldda liked to have seen that, but I never watch the Today Show...wonder if there's a transcript about.

FReegards...MUD

38 posted on 05/07/2004 10:08:06 AM PDT by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
I dunno if you can find transcripts. I tried to find one the other day, but had no luck. I've been flippin' over to FOX after local news, but I was doin' something else this mornin' when I caught it.
39 posted on 05/07/2004 10:11:18 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (To be willing to march into Hell, Boston and Chappauqua for a heavenly cause...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: snowtigger
"I still think that, just before the Dum convention, there will be a bombshell dropped on Kerry. This will be information so devestating that kerry will have to be dumped."

Another possibility is for VEEP hillary to wait until AFTER the election to clandestinely potty all over a newly elected kerry with those "....things which could be rather damaging". Then, kerry could be Nixoned-out as hillary assumes the office she is "entitled" to.
40 posted on 05/07/2004 10:18:43 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Anyone seen my tinfoil pyramid hat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson