Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President George W. Bush to offer apology on 2 Arab Televison station networks
5/5/2004

Posted on 05/05/2004 7:39:57 AM PDT by TexKat

Developing....


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arabtv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 441-452 next last
To: Eurotwit
It's my take that the President through his *top* advisers and others are falling all over themselves apologizing, instead of having some low level military commander over in that damn country make a brief comment of regret, and then shut up.

***********************************************************

Condoleezza Rice, Bush's national security adviser, apologized for the abuse in interviews yesterday with three Arabic television networks.

"We are deeply sorry for what has happened to these people and what the families must be feeling. It's just not right. And we will get to the bottom of what happened," Condoleezza Rice, the president's national security adviser, told the Dubai-based Arab channel Al-Arabiya.

"I couldn't be angrier," Deputy Secretary of State Richard L. Armitage said of the abuses. "I couldn't be sadder about them. And, frankly, I couldn't be sorrier that some Iraqi prisoners had to suffer from this humiliation.

381 posted on 05/05/2004 10:30:08 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
"I'm more concerned about victory in this world war over morality. "

I understand being upset, rational people are upset by this. I understand that you want victory too, but a victory with no sense of morality attached to it is meaningless.
382 posted on 05/05/2004 10:31:17 AM PDT by ShandaLear (Vote Quagmire...Vote Kerry!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
I'm more concerned about victory in this world war over morality.

In this war, if we lose morality...we lose the war.

383 posted on 05/05/2004 10:32:16 AM PDT by Poohbah (Darkdrake Lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: ShandaLear
Morality, in war, is meaningless. It's a subjective ideal that war often goes far beyond, especially at the individual level.

Ethics are fine for peacetime, but out go the rules when it's life and death.
384 posted on 05/05/2004 10:32:29 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
The terrorists and islamics will not be beaten by us being nicer than they are, I guarantee you this.
385 posted on 05/05/2004 10:33:06 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
They will be by our strength.

We will be beaten if we are left with no moral principles.

386 posted on 05/05/2004 10:34:17 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
The terrorists and islamics will not be beaten by us being nicer than they are, I guarantee you this.

It's not about "nice." It's about "right."

387 posted on 05/05/2004 10:34:27 AM PDT by Poohbah (Darkdrake Lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Ok, Joe, let me ask you a question from your reply #381, would you rather have a Kerry administration calling the shots.

JMO, but I will get no reply. Afterall you can't out yourself as a Katie/Kerry supporter on FR.

388 posted on 05/05/2004 10:35:00 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
In this war, if we lose morality...we lose the war.

Agreed.

389 posted on 05/05/2004 10:35:14 AM PDT by k2blader (Some folks should worry less about how conservatives vote and more about how to advance conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
'Right' in an asymetric warfare mode gets you killed.
390 posted on 05/05/2004 10:35:32 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
'Right' in an asymetric warfare mode gets you killed.

In which case, you're pronouncing the war already lost.

391 posted on 05/05/2004 10:36:06 AM PDT by Poohbah (Darkdrake Lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Inmorality loses wars and souls.
392 posted on 05/05/2004 10:36:23 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Does that mean that convictions were handed down to alleged perpetrators? Who are they?
393 posted on 05/05/2004 10:37:05 AM PDT by SMARTY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Well, we lost Vietnam and basically Korea too because of it. We didn't have the will to win. I don't think we do now either, morality seems more important than winning.
394 posted on 05/05/2004 10:37:53 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
The will to win has to married to the understanding of what you are fighting for.

Following your logic we need to dump a few nukes then strut away declaring victory.

What victory?
395 posted on 05/05/2004 10:39:53 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
I am speechless.
Does George W. Bush actually believe that islam is a religion of peace? That "most" muslims are not or do not support wanton random mass murder?
That "saving face" and "humiliation does not play a role in the dealings with sandmaggots?

He just set his own war on terrorism on a death spiral

This is getting scary...

396 posted on 05/05/2004 10:40:55 AM PDT by Publius6961 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Well, we lost Vietnam and basically Korea too because of it.

Wrong. We fought Korea to a draw--essentially, a loss for Kim Il-Sung.

We lost in Vietnam because we never had a viable strategy for winning. Morality--or lack thereof--didn't enter into it--we simply didn't understand that logistically massive forces were not relevant to that war.

We didn't have the will to win.

"Will to win" and morality are not opposites.

397 posted on 05/05/2004 10:40:56 AM PDT by Poohbah (Darkdrake Lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
Yup, looks like it. I've not been here that long but I did lurk for quite some time. I have noticed the trend.
398 posted on 05/05/2004 10:42:29 AM PDT by highlandbreeze (....that others may live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
"Will to win" and morality are not opposites.

Oh... Im not sure I agree there. I mean I agree that the guards are perverts who need to do hard time. But a lot of people draw the morality line in a lot of different places. Some of them in a place that prevents even going to war. I think morality and "we will win" can often be opposites for a lot of people. Maybe just not where you would draw the line.

399 posted on 05/05/2004 10:44:46 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Negotiating with animals has to be a sign of a mental disease. This is mind-boggling. Mounting a strategy as if he were negotiating with another westerner who even remotely holds the same values we do, and to whom "the right thing" actually has a meaning.

Holy cow.

400 posted on 05/05/2004 10:45:27 AM PDT by Publius6961 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 441-452 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson