Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jaime Gorelick has some explaining to do
Houston Chronicle ^ | 4/24/04

Posted on 04/24/2004 6:49:41 AM PDT by Libloather

9/11 COMMISSION
Jaime Gorelick has some explaining to do
April 24, 2004, 12:45AM
Houston Chronicle

No matter how long conservatives protest, Jaime Gorelick is unlikely to resign from her position on the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Against the United States. Despite her distinctly partisan approach, her place on the 10-member, supposedly nonpartisan 9/11 commission is defended by such Republican heavyweights as Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah and former New Jersey Gov. Thomas Kean, the commission's chairman.

The problem is that Gorelick, deputy attorney general in the Clinton administration, wrote a key Justice Department memo in 1995 raising the "wall" between the FBI and CIA, basically forbidding them from communicating with each other on matters involving terrorist suspects in the United States.

The 9/11 commission's charge is to find out what went wrong with U.S. intelligence prior to the horrific terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. Most people readily agree that central to the intelligence failure was the lack of communication between the CIA and FBI. Gorelick's memo contributed to communication break. As the Wall Street Journal pointed out in a recent editorial, Gorelick would certainly be witness before the 9/11 commission were she not a member.

The American public expects a full, objective report from the commission on our nation's intelligence mistakes and what must be done to prevent a 9/11 from occurring again. The commission is obligated to leave no stone unturned and appropriately allot responsibility.

The White House initially threw up barricades between it and the commission, delaying the release of relevant documents and resisting adequate and public testimony from people such as President Bush, Vice President Cheney and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice. But the White House eventually came around to answering the commission's requests.

In the same spirit of achieving an investigation that is honest and complete, Jaime Gorelick has some explaining to do, including why she has taken such a partisan approach to her post and why she accepted membership on the commission in the first place.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: 911commission; explaining; gorelick; jaime; rats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
...her distinctly partisan approach, her place on the 10-member, supposedly nonpartisan 9/11 commission...

Its stunning how ordinary, common RATS have no problem with partisanship...

1 posted on 04/24/2004 6:49:42 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"The American public expects a full, objective report from the commission on our nation's intelligence mistakes and what must be done to prevent a 9/11 from occurring again."

American public, do not hold your breath.
2 posted on 04/24/2004 6:56:13 AM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The American public expects a full, objective report from the commission on our nation's intelligence mistakes and what must be done to prevent a 9/11 from occurring again.

At one point we were hopeful for that. America now understands that we've all purchased a ticket at the circus instead. And it's a circus of clowns and only a few class acts.

Prairie

3 posted on 04/24/2004 6:57:55 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Gorelick, Ben-Veniste, Kerrey, Roemer. All proud, card-carrying members of "America's Fifth Column".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"...why she accepted membership on the commission in the first place."

This is just a guess, but I think she fought for a position on this Commission with all her might.

4 posted on 04/24/2004 6:57:58 AM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Bahbah
Hatch is two thirds nuts. Kean is a first class elitist jerk.
6 posted on 04/24/2004 7:05:47 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"Jaime Gorelick has some explaining to do."

Note to self
Don't hold your breath
Last time you almost died! ! ! !

7 posted on 04/24/2004 7:06:33 AM PDT by DeaconRed (sKerry did a flip flop, stepped on a pop top, got a purple heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
We have a comparison picture of Gorelick with another historic propagandist,
Joseph Goebbels Jamie Gorelick

Now, we need ones for Hatch and Kean as collaborators..... maybe comparison pictures of the Viche French???

8 posted on 04/24/2004 7:12:10 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (never surrender, this is for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Absolutely...Then she didn't have to answer any questions.
9 posted on 04/24/2004 7:17:01 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Even my flip-flops have more character than Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Even though many of her co-conspirators wish to keep her on, the President, by some executive order has the right to remove her. Please, Mr. President . . . .
10 posted on 04/24/2004 7:21:30 AM PDT by TiaS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
This is just a guess, but I think she fought for a position on this Commission with all her might.

She accepted the position so she wouldn't have to testify.

11 posted on 04/24/2004 7:27:27 AM PDT by jslade (<IPeople who are easily offended, OFFEND ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jslade
"She accepted the position so she wouldn't have to testify."

I don't doubt it for a minute.
12 posted on 04/24/2004 7:33:49 AM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The American public expects a full, objective report from the commission on our nation's intelligence mistakes and what must be done to prevent a 9/11 from occurring again

No they don't. The reason the constant attacks by the media and the 911 commission on Bush have actually increased Bush's poll numbers is the public sees the 911 commission as putting Demoratic party interests ahead of our Nations Interests.

The Democrats insisted that Ben Veniste be on the conmission because he was very effective at taking down Nixon. So Ben Veniste used the same tackics on Rice as he did on Nixon administration people.

Veniste is a fool. Nixon was never liked. The voters prefered Nixon to HHH and McGovern, but they did not like Dick Nixon. The public may not always support George W. Bush but they like him.

When congress, the media, and poltical opponents attack someone the voters don't very much like, the voters cheer. Attacking Nixon was smart Democratic politics because most voters did not like Nixon.

But when someone attacks a President the votes like, the voters get mad at the attackers and support the president who is attacked. It is just human nature and very counter productive to attack any politician that the voters like.

The third of the voters on the right hate Bill Clinton. But the other two thirds like Bill Clinton. The more the right attacked Bill Clinton the higher his job approval ratings went. At that height of the attack on Clinton and his Monica situation, Bill Clinton's job approval ratings were at 58 percent.

The more we attacked the higher Bill Clintons approval numbers went ..... from barely above 50 to over 58 percent.

So the 911 commision will have no bad political effect on Bush, except to make if far more difficult for Kerry to win.

The third of the voters on the left hate Dubya Bush. But the other two thirds like him. The more the left uses the 911 commission and the media to attack Dubya the more th two thirds that like him will defend him.

Ben Venista and the Democrats are fools. They only remember their success against Nixon, they do not underestand why we failed to get Clinton. They don't nkow it but theyare helping George W. Bush.

What we did for Clinton, they are doing for Bush.


13 posted on 04/24/2004 7:35:00 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The 9/11 Circus of Commissars.

The Greatest Show Trial On Earth.
14 posted on 04/24/2004 7:46:10 AM PDT by samtheman (www.georgewbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Hatch is two thirds nuts. Kean is a first class elitist jerk.

IMHO the reason the Dems always get the upper hand is they are like the Borg. Its all for one and one for all. The Reps have people like Kean and Hatch that at least in this case sound like Democrats. No support for the Republican position. I guess resistance is futile.

15 posted on 04/24/2004 7:52:25 AM PDT by Lawgvr1955 (I am thankful for government waste. Just think if we got all the government we paid for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks; Lawgvr1955
As someone here has said before, never count your Hatchs before they chicken.
16 posted on 04/24/2004 8:07:40 AM PDT by blanknoone (Imagine if we had FR, talk radio and Fox during the Tet offensive...how different history would be..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone; Libloather; Bahbah; prairiebreeze; Baynative; Voter#537; FreeAtlanta; hoosiermama; ...
Commissioner Kean has said publicly that the future hearings are going to be more low key. Could it be that they are aware now that there are more embarrassing memo's that might suddenly be declassified? Having had their collective butts singed wasn't pleasant and they don't want a repeat.
17 posted on 04/24/2004 8:11:05 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Has anyone heard whether Monsoor Ijaz's testimony is going to be public or not? The last I heard he was to testify on May 6th behind closed doors. There was a campaign to get the 9-11 Commission to make Ijaz's testimony public when it was first announced. I haven't heard diddly squat since then.
18 posted on 04/24/2004 8:17:41 AM PDT by not2worry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
To: blanknoone

Good one!!

19 posted on 04/24/2004 8:20:47 AM PDT by Lawgvr1955 (I am thankful for government waste. Just think if we got all the government we paid for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Even if she did quit, which she will never do, the 9/11 commission would still be entirely useless. Its only purpose was to stir up trouble, shield the clintons from blame, and undermine Bush.

Fortunately when half the commission went on talk TV to bash Bush, people understood what they were doing. Their credibility is entirely gone. Even liberals understand the game and only pretend to believe them. That won't stop the Washington ComPost and the NY TImes from trying to make full use of them, but it won't work.
20 posted on 04/24/2004 8:23:02 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson