Posted on 04/23/2004 10:51:49 AM PDT by Weimdog
MUNICH - It's proving hard for German fans to swallow - the 2006 football World Cup looks likely to go ahead without German beer.
Now shocked politicians are seeking talks with tournament organizers after it emerged that a US brewer has the exclusive right to sell its beer in and around World Cup stadiums.
A World Cup in Germany without traditional German beer is almost as inconceivable for Germans as the country's football team failing to qualify for the tournament - or losing to England on penalties.
But the Germans may have scored an own goal in allowing football's world organizing body FIFA to secure an exclusive contract with the US brewer Anheuser-Busch, brewers of Budweiser, as one of the tournament's official sponsors.
In Bavaria, where beer is regarded as part of the state's cultural heritage, senior government officials have met to discuss the serious prospect of the World Cup kicking off in Munich's new Allianz stadium without any of its traditional wheat beers on sale.
The local Green party has called on state premier Edmund Stoiber to make the lack of German World Cup beer a top-level issue.
"We will very shortly be approaching the World Cup organizing committee to see what possibilities there still are," said a culture ministry spokeswoman.
Both Munich and Nuremberg, another Bavarian World Cup venue, are now planning "fan villages" outside stadium precincts so supporters can buy German beer instead of American Budweiser.
Gerhard Ohneis, head of the Augustiner brewery, told Munich's Merkur newspaper: "It's annoying if there is not going to be any Munich beer in the Munich stadium."
A spokesman for Paulaner brewery said a possibility might be to enable Bavarian beer to be sold in "neutral glasses".
Bavarian Social Democrat parliamentary group leader Franz Maget said: "The cities will make sure that World Cup visitors are supplied with respectable products."
Nuremberg has an additional problem - it won't be able to sell its traditional Nuremberg sausages at World Cup games. "McDonald's has the exclusive on sausage supplies," Maget said.
And if that were not enough, German carmakers will also be left on the sidelines, with players, VIPS and officials being shuttled to and from games by South Korean sponsor Hyundai.
How about I meet you there next Saturday. I'll bring a case of Buds, and then we can take France.
Let's make a weekend of it.
To get to my point, I think it would be hilarious if German officials were to say "ja, you can be the sponsor, but you cannot call your American carbonated water 'Budweiser' here. Since 'Alcoholic Perrier' would likely upset the Frogs, let us call your product... hmm... what is the word for 'bubbly goat urine', Klaus?"
And sure, there are people who find American Budweiser drinkable, but then, anything that close to plain old water would fit that description. To each their own, I guess.
We'll have to take a three day weekend. Being in Spain, I must play 18 with my golf hero Sevi.
(that's really more of a rum thing)
I doubt any could compete with the likes of Anheuser Busch. Some things just shouldn't be left up to pure capitalism. Could you imagine some German company winning the right to serve hamburgers at a big U.S. event? (Germans couldn't make hamburgers to save their lives) No, I'd want a nice, fat juicy real burger.
I had to ask what he thought of the local Pearl Beer. With his palm facing down, he waved his hand at waist level, and stated "it was like drinking off the bottom of the cess pool".
I then asked him about Budweiser. He perked right up. In a similar motion, he held his hand over his head and said "Ah!! Budweiser! Now, that's like drinking off the top of the cess pool".
Didn't you read the part about McDonalds being the other sponsor? So much for your "nice, fat juicy real burger." But you do get the fat.
If it were on a bottle, the label would probably say "Ziegeurin mit Kohlensäure."
The Bud cases continue with one or the other winning in various countries. The UK made a compromise where both could be sold under their names. For pure standard-of-living reasons, I suggest having a taste test between the two and letting the better keep the name (Sorry, AB).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.