>> Not applicable in a case of marriage. Terri's husband has no biblical mandate for honoring his relatives-in-law.
So you STILL consider him married?
Checkout post 82 here,
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1120621/posts?page=82#82 ...and in particular, the two 1992 'bullets', the 1992 photo
taken for the jury's consideration, and the 1996 and 1998
'bullets'
NOW do you still consider him married?
I read post 82. I don't see any interpretation of it other than there are folks trying to use Terri because they are pissed at her husband. While he might be a turd, he is A) married to Terri and B)judgable by God only about this issue.
One thing I don't think anyone has considered is Terri's wishes. We don't know what Terri's wishes are. There is at least a equal probability that she asks God daily to take her home and out of her misery.
If she were in this fix in an earlier part of the century, she would have passed away already. Only our current high technology is keeping her here.
I used to think that those so passionate about Terri's life were afraid of state ordered death. I don't think that any longer. I think it's more hatred for Michael than love for Terri.
Sorry.
