Skip to comments.
Clinton Accuses Bush of Withholding Information from Public
Talon News / GOP USA ^
| April 21, 2004
| Jimmie Moore
Posted on 04/21/2004 7:27:30 AM PDT by prairiebreeze
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
"Many in this administration are quite expert at saying nothing despite your best efforts to get them to say something," Clinton accused in Editor & Publisher.Pot. Kettle. Black.
Prairie
To: Peach; Mo1; cyncooper; Dog; Miss Marple; doodlelady
Hitlery ping
2
posted on
04/21/2004 7:28:24 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(Gorelick, Ben-Veniste, Kerrey, Roemer. All proud, card-carrying members of "America's Fifth Column".)
To: prairiebreeze
As El Rushbo always stated...don't listen to what the Clintonistas say...watch what they do...she's making her political move, folks....
3
posted on
04/21/2004 7:29:23 AM PDT
by
smiley
To: prairiebreeze
What an arrogant gasbag. But I realize he's only trying to divert attention away from the pathetic Dem nominee whose image is crumbling fast.
4
posted on
04/21/2004 7:29:31 AM PDT
by
sarasota
To: prairiebreeze
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) accused President George W. Bush of withholding information from the American people in remarks at a gathering of newspaper editors in Washington on Tuesday. Hmmmmm. I wonder if he has any documents in his bedroom closet that have been under a subpeona for more than a year.
5
posted on
04/21/2004 7:29:45 AM PDT
by
VRWCmember
(Bush's Viet Nam?! Shut up, Teddy; Iraq isn't even Bush's Chappaquidick!)
To: prairiebreeze
What did Bush do, "lose" Rose Law Firm Billing records?
Did Bush say, "I can't recall" at least 15 times while before a grand jury?
To: prairiebreeze
"[S]o much is at stake now and the public needs more information," Clinton exclaimed.
Such as... what? Stupid witch, we will not go on fishing expeditions with this stinkbait of yours.
7
posted on
04/21/2004 7:30:29 AM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: prairiebreeze
When I first read this last evening I sent a letter to the writer and the editor reminding them of Shrillary's attempt to overhaul (screw up) Health Care, her gathering of 300 to 500 people to discuss it, and how she refused to release minutes of it, or a list of attendees, even in the face of a court order. I asked why they didn't ask her how that was any different.
I'm still waiting on a reply.
8
posted on
04/21/2004 7:31:11 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(JOHN KERRY never saw a TAX he would not HIKE !)
To: prairiebreeze
I wish she would jump on her broom and get out of sight forever.
9
posted on
04/21/2004 7:32:42 AM PDT
by
Piquaboy
To: prairiebreeze
So, how would Hillary explain all those embedded journalists in the Iraqi War 2?
oooppppssss, another Hillary memory lapse.
10
posted on
04/21/2004 7:32:42 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: prairiebreeze
If she wasn't so evil I'd laugh at her hilarious accusations.
11
posted on
04/21/2004 7:33:04 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: prairiebreeze
Why, of course, the editors from the New York Times and Washington Post should have a seat at the presidents staff meetings and a closed circuit camera in the Oval Office.
The hideous Medusa from Chappequa and "smartest woman in the world" hasn't uttered an intelligent thought since it became a "senator".
To: prairiebreeze
"This administration, to an extent I haven't seen before, tells the press to go away -- and they do, like most people do when told that more than once."
Oh my god! I can't stop laughing at this one!
13
posted on
04/21/2004 7:34:30 AM PDT
by
84rules
To: prairiebreeze
She is the expert after all.
14
posted on
04/21/2004 7:35:30 AM PDT
by
Corporate Law
(<>< -- Xavier Basketball - Perennial Slayer of #1 Ranked Teams)
To: prairiebreeze
Is there a specific charge in here somewhere? Is the media now carrying as news every time Hillary gets to "bit_hing about her opponents."
Seriously, if there's a specific charge lurking in that article, would someone point it out for me.
15
posted on
04/21/2004 7:36:05 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: Frank_Discussion
hitlery rotten clintoon is the stinkbait and has always been the stinkbait and always will be the stinkbait.
To: prairiebreeze
Talk about the Pot calling the kettle Black.
Clinton knows it's going to come out from the 9/11 hearings that he covered up terrorist involvement in OKC and flight 800. He's trying to misdirect that now and make any such revelations look like revenge for his comments.
17
posted on
04/21/2004 7:37:28 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: prairiebreeze; OXENinFLA
that Bush has roadblocked the necessary information that editors need to write accurate stories. So lacking the necessary info, they make up their stories out of whole cloth, and it's Bush's fault!
Waaaaaa!!!
18
posted on
04/21/2004 7:37:28 AM PDT
by
StriperSniper
(Ernest Strada Fanclub)
To: prairiebreeze
The leftists accuse others of what they themselves are most often guilty of doing.
And yet this closed administration gave unprecedented access to Woodward. Something doesn't square with Hitlery's comments.
19
posted on
04/21/2004 7:37:53 AM PDT
by
Peach
To: prairiebreeze
Was that really Hill? IMO it was a double.
If I recall correctly, when Ms. Clinton is asked a question she answers "I don't recall." That is why I believe this was an evil twin to the esteemed senator.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson