Skip to comments.
Why Kerry Will Win (Joseph Farah Warns History Is Repeating Itself All Over Again)
Worldnetdaily.com ^
| 04/21/04
| Joseph Farah
Posted on 04/21/2004 2:04:02 AM PDT by goldstategop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
Joseph Farah thinks John F. Kerry is going to win. Sorry to rain on every one's parade but history looks like its going to repeat itself. If President Bush and his supporters discount the bounce out of a Democratic Convention, they're dreaming. Overconfidence is our biggest enemy. You say you don't want this prediction to become a reality? Then be prepared!
To: goldstategop
Joe Farah is an idiot. The Brigadiers might have use for him, but I haven't considered him a serious Conservative scribe in quite a while.
2
posted on
04/21/2004 2:08:17 AM PDT
by
ABG(anybody but Gore)
(Wolfgang Puck does not belong on Iron Chef America, no matter how funny his accent is.)
To: goldstategop
Depressing to consider ... how can something
sooo... obviously wrong happen
again, when we are just starting to recover from the most corrupt and treasonous presidential terms in our history?
Damn ... just damn.
3
posted on
04/21/2004 2:10:15 AM PDT
by
ThePythonicCow
(Defeat J Frondeur Kerry)
To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
Perhaps not an idiot -- the steely determination to every thing we can to reelect Bush will serve us well for the next half year.
Joe Farah is doing a good job of stoking that determination.
4
posted on
04/21/2004 2:12:50 AM PDT
by
ThePythonicCow
(Defeat J Frondeur Kerry)
To: goldstategop
Farah also predicted Howard Dean could/would beat Bush and then Wesley Clark would beat Bush (maybe not in that order). Farah is kinda' a glass-half-empty guy, don't you think?
Truth tell, he looks forward to a Kerry presidency, because in his mind, it hastens a national Armageddon, which he relishes the thought of. There is a certain allure to gloom and doom and even the fulfillment of it to some people. Don't believe me; just look at some of Farah's past columns.
Of course, he could well be right. Shivers...
To: goldstategop
Just more Farah DOOM & GLOOM. Nothing unusual here.
One wins by being POSITIVE, by passing POSITIVE messages to others. Write him off!!!! I'll take President Bush's message as my motto.
When asked if he was worried about possibly losing, President Bush said "NO" for I'm going to WIN!!!!
That's what we need to hear.
GO BUSH GO!!!!!!! On to Victory.
6
posted on
04/21/2004 2:15:35 AM PDT
by
Gracey
(NOT Fonda Kerry and his 9.10 Democrat Party mentality)
To: goldstategop
Bill Clinton was in John Kerry's position. He was running considerably further behind George H.W. Bush in the polls. Naturally, Farah neglects to mention is that the Democratic primary in 1992 was not decided until April -- unlike Kerry, who sewed up the nomination in early March.
Again in 1996, Clinton was running behind Bob Dole in the polls leading up to the Democratic convention.
A lie. Dole never led Clinton in 1996.
This is my prediction. Mark it down. Remember where you heard it. The day after the Democratic convention, Kerry will be a front-runner.
What a prediction. Dukakis led Bush Sr. by 17% after his convention in 1988.
Gallup Poll (4/16/04-/4/18/04)
George W. Bush
Approval: 52%
Disapproval: 45%
No Opinion: 3%
Gallup Poll (4/20/1992-4/22/1992)
George H.W. Bush
Approval: 42%
Disapproval: 48%
No Opinion: 10%
To: ThePythonicCow
If Effin's elected, I'm outsourcing myself to Chile.
8
posted on
04/21/2004 2:16:56 AM PDT
by
dasboot
(I do not mock. Much.)
To: goldstategop
everyone bounces after their convention... even Al Gore did in 2000... we'll never know how things might have turned out had certain states not been called so early... or even had polling places in Missouri not stayed open later than was legal... or had that DUI or DWI not been brought out four days before the election... i'm sure Mr. Farah who is not a Bush supporter would be giddy if he were right about this... i don't believe for one second that he hates to rain on my parade...
To: ThePythonicCow
I've never been able to take him seriously since he lambasted "South Park" as the very basis of all evil in America in a column, and then admitted he'd never seen a single episode. So, I guess, yeah, I have a problem with his objectivity.
10
posted on
04/21/2004 2:18:26 AM PDT
by
ABG(anybody but Gore)
(Wolfgang Puck does not belong on Iron Chef America, no matter how funny his accent is.)
To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
Because I(Farah) don't have a dog in this hunt, I think I can see it a little more objectively, a little more clearly. Wow a neo-Ms. Cleo. Gee Joe, your "clear" thinking left out that Dukakis was ahead by 17 points after the demo convention in 88 and you totally left out Perot.
11
posted on
04/21/2004 2:18:56 AM PDT
by
Dane
To: goldstategop
What sunshine this man is. (/sarcasm)
12
posted on
04/21/2004 2:19:12 AM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(illegitimo noncarborundium)
Oh yeah . . .
March 2004 Unemployment Rate - 5.7%
March 1992 Unemployment Rate - 7.8%
To: goldstategop
Joseph Farah thinksThat's your first mistaken conclusion.
14
posted on
04/21/2004 2:22:48 AM PDT
by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
To: Dane
The man is a legend in his own mind. His psychic powers abound in his own little brain.
15
posted on
04/21/2004 2:24:48 AM PDT
by
ABG(anybody but Gore)
(Wolfgang Puck does not belong on Iron Chef America, no matter how funny his accent is.)
To: goldstategop
Farah is his usual idiotic self. Even if you loath Clinton, you have to admit that he was a very slick, smooth, cunning, charismatic campaigner, SOMETHING LURCH IS NOT!
16
posted on
04/21/2004 2:25:16 AM PDT
by
AmericaUnited
(It's time someone says the emperor has no clothes.)
To: goldstategop
Because I don't have a dog in this hunt, I think I can see it a little more objectively, a little more clearly.FWIW, as anyone paying attention might've guessed, I was ready earlier this year to jump ship myself given the slightest opportunity. John Kerry isn't it..
That's a big part of why I think Bush will win - Kerry's just too repellant. Had it been Gephardt or Edwards or Graham or Clark or Lieberman he would've probably lost.
Farah doesn't mention though where John Kerry's actually gonna get his big boost: It's gonna be from his VP pick and I think that'll catapult him to frontrunner for a while.
17
posted on
04/21/2004 2:28:28 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
To: goldstategop; All
I think we'd do well to heed his warning. Clinton had 90% of the news
and entertainment media rooting for him, and in my opinion that is what was mainly responsible for his weaseling into office the first time, and his ability to cling to it once in power.
While I don't see that sort of enthusiastic backing for Kerry in this cycle from the Jackal Pack media, it is somewhat compensated by their visceral hatred for Mr. Bush.
Forewarned is forearmed.
18
posted on
04/21/2004 2:28:48 AM PDT
by
backhoe
To: goldstategop
It's true that Kerry is a colorless, humorless, unlikable patrician. Which is exactly why he won't win. Clinton was "Bubba". He was your drinking buddy. He might have been a lying scumbag, but he came across as somebody you could LIKE.
But Kerry? Cold dead fish have more personality.
19
posted on
04/21/2004 2:29:56 AM PDT
by
PogySailor
(Proud member of the RAM)
To: backhoe
Exactly. Overconfidence is not a good thing. We have to fight like we're behind and we're gonna lose the election.
20
posted on
04/21/2004 2:30:03 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson