So what do you think of this religion of peace?
Semper Fi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: An Old Man
Wow. That's the straightest talk I've seen in print yet.
Isn't Panama City is the home of Tyndall Air Force Base? And Eglin is just a little ways to the west.
To: An Old Man
You are totally right on with this article.
Muslims are not now nor have they ever been anything less than the most intollerant people on the planet. Simple as that.
3 posted on
04/20/2004 1:17:41 PM PDT by
Beckwith
(Mullahs are the only preists on the planet teaching hate from the pulpit . . .)
To: An Old Man
It doesnt take a Darwin to figure out that in this world the smartest, the fastest, the strongest, and the most committed always win. No exceptions. Poison will contradict that statement. - Tom
4 posted on
04/20/2004 1:19:14 PM PDT by
Capt. Tom
(Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb republicans. - Capt. Tom)
To: An Old Man
That is an excellent article!
6 posted on
04/20/2004 1:19:35 PM PDT by
mtnwmn
To: An Old Man
Excellent piece and like a splash of cold water to those who do not see the religous butchery rampant upon the planet.
We could fill the newspaper every morning with mobs of fanatical Muslims.
Wouldn't want to scare the citizens by exposing them to the truth, would we.
To: An Old Man
Can anybody name three ongoing world conflicts in which Muslims are not involved? Today, where there is war, there are fanatical Muslims. We might quibble about who started what conflicts, but look at the sheer number of them.Europe is basically filled with Socialist liberals, and into abortion. Because baby killing is so common there, the Muslims are out breading them in great numbers. Europe's time is limited.
10 posted on
04/20/2004 1:47:39 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: An Old Man
BTTT
11 posted on
04/20/2004 1:50:20 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: An Old Man
13 posted on
04/20/2004 2:21:09 PM PDT by
backhoe
(Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the TrackBall into the Sunset...)
To: An Old Man
Excellent, and I agree that it should be required reading by all citizens.
To: An Old Man
Hey now! Don't hold back. Tell us what you really think. I like it!
A.K.A. Sleepy Brown
17 posted on
04/20/2004 3:22:27 PM PDT by
rdb3
(Let others praise ancient times; I am glad I was born in these.)
To: dennisw; Sabertooth; FITZ; yonif; Grampa Dave; An Old Man
Insane murder cult ping!
19 posted on
04/20/2004 3:48:35 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: third try; Hiskid
Ping!
To: An Old Man
Bush and his war council should digest the facts of this article and then give up trying to impose democracy on Muslims who don't want it, don't understand it, don't appreciate it and which goes against Islam.
President Bush should not make our soldiers sacrifice their lives to bring democracy to Iraq. Bomb the hell out of the terrorists and then get the hell out of their countries.
21 posted on
04/20/2004 6:02:39 PM PDT by
fatidic
To: An Old Man
Great editorial.
I think that bin Laden drew a perfectly natural conclusion - kill enough people and the survivors will accommodate you. Certainly nothing in his previous experience with both Europeans and Americans disabused him of that notion. And it isn't just him.
It is, in my experience, a difficult thing for civilized, tolerant people to understand that there really are other people who want to kill them and won't be talked out of it. These cling to negotiation because its alternative, killing, offends their moral senses and is not, under normal circumstances, anything but a last-resort policy anyway. Morality has, for them, become so blurred by safety and luxury that they truly do believe that fighting back lowers one to the level of the attacker. Only the protected can afford that level of "broad-mindedness."
In truth, however, we have not forgotten which is the business end of the gun, or at least enough of us have not to make the difference. That may change. If it does, bin Laden will have been proven right. I hope it does not happen in my lifetime.
To: An Old Man
bttt
To: An Old Man
bttt
26 posted on
04/20/2004 10:09:31 PM PDT by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: An Old Man
"Our president announced it would be a very long war, then took the battle to the Islamic homeland. Sound familiar?
Lets consider the concept of a long war. Last time it was 200 years, give or take. "
This "long war" is a fatal mindset we have. We don't have to have a long war. Saying it will be a long war is nonsense. We have the ability, the opportunity, and the responsibility to win this war quickly. The "longer" we drag this out the more time the enemy has to get WMDs into Iraq or the U.S.
Start issuing nuclear ultimatums before they are issued on US.
To: An Old Man
Great article, I missed your post and tried to repost. I'm giving it a MUST READ BUMP!
31 posted on
04/22/2004 9:19:09 AM PDT by
Robbin
To: An Old Man; SJackson; yonif; Simcha7; American in Israel; spectacularbid2003; Binyamin; ...
Great article! Seems not all newspaper editors are brainwashed in the false religion of multi-culturalism and relativism.
AMERICA AT WARAt Salem the Soldier's Homepage ~
33 posted on
04/22/2004 4:23:43 PM PDT by
Salem
(FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
To: An Old Man
34 posted on
04/22/2004 4:27:23 PM PDT by
PsyOp
(All war presupposes human weakness, and seeks to exploit it. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson