Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gorelick role raised early
Washington Times ^ | 4/19/04 | Charles Hurt

Posted on 04/18/2004 10:42:39 PM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:14:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Jimmy Valentine
Mama, if your blood is boiling now, wait until Gorelick's work at the Pentagon comes out into the public record.

When do you think this will occur? Can you provide any other details about this?

41 posted on 04/19/2004 4:25:56 AM PDT by RobFromGa (There isn't always an easy path, but there is always a right path.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine
Help, when did Gorelick work at Pentagon, what did she do?


Hillry needing to be on the Senate Armed Forces Committee was very telling.
42 posted on 04/19/2004 4:29:35 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
I've already posted the following twice, but it can't be too often imo:

According to American Spectator (April 14, 2004),Gorelick helped to prep Janet Reno for Reno's appearance before the Commission. Then, since Gorelick had "recused" herself, she handed her questions to Slade Gorton, who asked Gorelick's questions of Reno.

43 posted on 04/19/2004 4:31:51 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
What until you see what she did at the DOE and the IRS.
44 posted on 04/19/2004 4:39:44 AM PDT by Diogenesis (We do what we are meant to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Well, one responsiblity that Gorelick did while at DOD was sitting on the Threat Reduction Advisory Committee. Sounds to me like something that would be worth checking out...
45 posted on 04/19/2004 4:39:50 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
What time frame, under Cohen or Aspen? How long was she there, was this before her being at DOJ or after?
46 posted on 04/19/2004 4:41:44 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Thanks for the info.
47 posted on 04/19/2004 4:42:26 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This is LIE!!!! NPR explained today how the venom spewing John Ashcroft falsely accused and viciously slandered the gentle Ms. Gorelick in his self-serving 'testimony' before the 9-11 commission.

This morning's NPR went on to explain how the signed and initialed 'wall' memo was actually written by Ronald Reagan and how the gentle Ms. Gorelick has received 'death threats' after being smeared by hate-radio's vitriol spewing Rush Limbaugh.

48 posted on 04/19/2004 4:45:43 AM PDT by martin gibson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Click here for a press release announcing the formation of the committee in 1998.
49 posted on 04/19/2004 4:46:17 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
bttt
50 posted on 04/19/2004 4:47:54 AM PDT by Guenevere (..., .Press on toward the goal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa; Stretch; .45MAN
Nice to *meet* you Stretch. thank you for your offer to help.

We may your help in the upcoming District 4 elections (Cynthia McNinny).

Thank you for the ping (((((Rob))))).
51 posted on 04/19/2004 4:57:57 AM PDT by dansangel (*PROUD to be a knuckle-dragging, toothless, inbred, right-wing, Southern, gun-toting Neanderthal *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
...against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Thank you Mr. Ashcroft.
52 posted on 04/19/2004 5:01:04 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Well well, so hidden right there in the middle, Gorelick of FannieMae.... only credit given to her placed upon the "THREAT REDUCTION ADVISORY COMMITTEE".

Rummy comes in and starts a "bottom up review" and is darn near thrown to the dogs, as Hillry gets herself on that all important Armed Forces Committee.

OK Hillry has been warning about a "Hoover economy" wonder when she plans this "attack" October???? Their "circle" is ever so small and tight with this bunch. How the Clintons corrupted all the institutions of power, political, economy, education and religion......
53 posted on 04/19/2004 5:03:20 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
Don't tell me; that's his high school yearbook picture!!!!
54 posted on 04/19/2004 5:05:06 AM PDT by Betteboop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Love to know who made the decision to put her on that committee and why. And what the committee did, if anything, while she was there.
55 posted on 04/19/2004 5:05:57 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
"Love to know who made the decision to put her on that committee and why. And what the committee did, if anything, while she was there."

Yes, all those little questions, and right after Clinton sent Cohen and Albright out to sell a war in Iraq, all those WMDs Saddam had, the wag the dog, which Cohen almost cried about in his testimony before "The Commission". Obviously Cohen resented being called the "dog".
56 posted on 04/19/2004 5:12:15 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
At this point, it might be best to complain about Jamieel alGore-Lick, but not to take any serious steps to remove her. Her presence discredits the entire commission, it demonstrates beyond doubt that it is a partisan body, and it proves that any conclusions they reach are totally untrustworthy.

This commission is a joke.

That should be the talking point.

For Pete's sake, she is part of the law firm that is representing the Saudis who are being sued for damages by the 9/11 families. THAT ALONE should have disqualified her for this commission.
57 posted on 04/19/2004 5:24:37 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Posted in another thread:


Even Clinton staffers know the truth

But according to former Clinton staffers, it's doubtful Gorelick will budge. "She's on that commission for a reason, and it isn't because of her brilliant legal mind," says a former DNC and Clinton White House staffer. "She's there to make sure Bush and his team look as bad as possible and to protect the Clintons and Reno."

58 posted on 04/19/2004 5:35:22 AM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Gorelick's vicious questioning of Dr. Rice only served to bring attention to herself.

Now she has to answer to her own role in creating the climate for the loss of thousands of lives here in America and hundreds of lives of Americans around the world.

We must keep bringing her role to the attention of the public by writing letters to our newspapers, calling talk radio, and insisting that the media pay some attention.....

59 posted on 04/19/2004 5:43:51 AM PDT by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Migraine
GoreLick is clearly right up there in deserving the "Scumbag" label.

This broad ought not be on any commission investigating the breakdown of terrorism in this country; she ought to be indicted instead.

Daschle ought to be indicted, too, if it is true that he is the person responsible for placing her on this commission.

One good thing, though, is that these two certainly have revealed without a doubt the Demodog's most important concern about the findings of this commission.
60 posted on 04/19/2004 5:48:26 AM PDT by AFPhys (My Passion review: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1089021/posts?page=13#13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson