To: kattracks
I amazed at how this keeps growing more each day.
This lady needs to be under oath before the committee.
14 posted on
04/16/2004 1:47:11 AM PDT by
Preachin'
(Why become a democrat if I have to lie to do it?)
To: Preachin'
This lady needs to be under oath before the committee.And hopefuly she won't pull the same trick that Reno did before the committee: "I'm sorry, I need guidance, I don't know what is and isn't classfied anymore," which got her off the hook and left the public with 45 minutes of softball questions.
34 posted on
04/16/2004 3:43:28 AM PDT by
angkor
To: Preachin'
This lady needs to be under oath before the committee.yes, but this commision will probably just ask her what she had for lunch... let her squirm for a while... there's nothing like uncertainty/the chance of hope vs the possibilty of spending a looooong time in trouble to drive a person nuts
43 posted on
04/16/2004 4:33:25 AM PDT by
InvisibleChurch
(I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it)
To: Preachin'
I'm more inclined to think an oath before a Grand Jury would be more appropriate.
63 posted on
04/16/2004 5:53:17 AM PDT by
Toespi
(,)
To: Preachin'
Fire Gorelick, replace her with Kissinger. My Gawd, I wish he hadn't had to recuse himself. How 'bout Rudy? Put Rudy on there.
154 posted on
04/16/2004 11:27:20 AM PDT by
johnb838
("I really don't care; they're all gonna die," US Marine in Fallujah)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson