Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10 Outrageous Facts About the Income Tax
Cato Institute ^ | April 15, 2003 | Chris Edwards

Posted on 04/15/2004 6:52:25 PM PDT by phil_will1

As you struggle to prepare your taxes this year, you may take some comfort in knowing that your headache is being felt across the country. The following odd and outrageous facts show how widespread income tax problems are:

The U.S. "tax army" is bigger than the U.S. army in Iraq. Income taxes are so complex that there are up to 1.2 million paid tax preparers in the country -- six times more than the number of troops in Iraq. The tax army includes legions of accountants, lawyers, and computer experts -- some of the best minds in the country. Unfortunately, their brainpower is adding little to the nation's standard of living.

A tax form for every special interest. As the income tax grows more complex, the number of IRS tax forms has jumped from 402 in 1990 to 526 by 2002. Congress hands the accountants business on a silver platter when they create special interest tax forms such as "8845-Indian Employment Credit" and "8834-Qualified Electric Vehicle Credit." When Congress penalizes an activity, we get tax forms such as "6197-Gas Guzzler Tax." It's time to end the micromanaging and adopt a simple flat-rate tax. Until then, Congress needs to supplement "6478-Credit for Alcohol Used as Fuel" with form "XXX-Credit for Alcohol Used for Drinking."

Double-tax on dividends: 60 years and still not fixed. Sixty years ago, a Treasury report noted that "double taxation of corporate profits is the principal problem raised in connection with the corporation income tax." In the 1930s, a Treasury report argued that the tax disincentive to pay dividends caused corporate management problems. Recent scandals proved them right. Congress should bite the bullet and reform dividend taxes now -- before the next round of corporate scandals begins.

Congress promotes discrimination through the tax code. The front of the Supreme Court building boldly declares "equal justice under law," yet the income tax has hundreds of discriminatory provisions. For example, homeowners are treated more favorably than renters since they can deduct mortgage interest and other itemized deductions. Consider that a higher-income homeowner can effectively deduct car loan interest by shifting around his finances but a lower-income apartment dweller cannot. Americans would not stand for such discrimination on other taxes -- imagine if each shopper at Wal-Mart was assigned a different sales tax rate!

Congress on tax complexity: Who us? Congress frequently holds hearings on tax simplification so members can denounce the tax code's complexity. Each time, congressional experts and outside think tanks provide useful simplification ideas. Then when the TV cameras are turned off, Congress promptly ignores them and votes for more special interest breaks. The result: The number of pages in the tax code and regulations doubled from 26,300 in 1984 to 54,846 by 2003, according to tax publisher CCH.

AMT designed to catch 155 taxpayers will soon catch 37 million. The alternative minimum tax is an unneeded parallel tax system alongside the ordinary income tax. It began life in 1969 after Congress was shocked (shocked!) to learn that 155 wealthy individuals were not paying tax because they used too many of the deductions that Congress had provided them. The AMT has been a complex nuisance ever since. But this dumb idea aimed at the rich is set to explode on the middle-class as the number of AMT taxpayers skyrockets from 3 million today to 36 million by 2010.

Voluntarism works for the U.S. military, not the income tax. For years, officials have hailed the income tax as a voluntary system. The Treasury calls it "our voluntary tax system." The IRS says that it pursues "enforcement programs to promote voluntary compliance" and establishes "strategies to maximize voluntary tax law compliance by emphasizing customer satisfaction." But with 32 million IRS penalties assessed each year and about $10,000 in income taxes imposed on each taxpaying household, the tax isn't voluntary and these customers aren't satisfied.

Congress can't figure out how to measure "income." Although the income tax is 90 years old, Congress still can't figure out how to measure "income." Some income such as municipal bond interest is not taxed, but other income such as dividends is taxed twice. The income tax treatment of savings is particularly incoherent and unstable. For example, there have been 25 major changes in the capital gains tax since 1922. The solution is to replace the income tax with a low-rate tax that exempts savings.

Family saving shouldn't require an advanced math degree. Shouldn't saving for education, retirement, and other items be as simple as putting money in the bank? Instead, Congress has manufactured hundreds of special savings rules, such as for 401(k)s, Keoghs, deductible IRAs, nondeductible IRAs, education IRAs, Roth IRAs, traditional pension plans, annuities, SIMPLEs, SEPs, MSAs, and others. The IRS guide to IRAs alone is 105 pages long! President Bush's initiative to consolidate the savings plans and create a universal IRA would be a good step to bring some sanity to this mess.

Income taxes: A bad idea that got worse. The income tax is not an example of a good idea gone bad. It was bad from the beginning, and it just keeps getting worse. The income tax distorts financial planning and business investment, and it encourages tax avoidance and evasion. Because the income tax is built on an unworkable base of "income," the law is continually changing. Let's simplify Americans' finances and disband the tax army by pursuing fundamental tax reform.

Source: CCH Inc. Number of pages in the CCH Standard Federal Tax Reporter, www.cch.com.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: axixofevil; cato; incometax; taxes; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: jocon307

21 posted on 04/16/2004 5:41:37 AM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer

22 posted on 04/16/2004 5:43:22 AM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

23 posted on 04/16/2004 5:46:03 AM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
"I wonder (often) why a sales tax is great for cities and states, but is wrong for the federal government. I'm not pushing for one. I'm just wondering."

I would guess it is more tradition than anything else. Since the income tax has come into being in 1913, it has grown to become the primary source of revenue for the federal government. Of course, the ratification of the 16th amendment in 1913 in effect overruled the judgement of the founding fathers (who had opposed the imposition of an income tax) and that of the Supreme Court in the late 1800s (who ruled an income tax unconstitutional).

Many of us today believe that it was the founding fathers and the Supreme Court of the late 1800s who had it right and the congress of 1913 who had it wrong.
24 posted on 04/16/2004 6:58:56 AM PDT by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
I vote we use a guillotine :O)

I think it's more interesting if you sprinkled salt on them to watch them shrivel up...

25 posted on 04/16/2004 7:08:19 AM PDT by Axenolith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
However, their solution - the Flat Tax - is totally inadequate for the magnitude of the problem. It is the equivalent of treating a cancer patient with aspirin. These guys MUST be kidding.

With all due respect, ignorance of the all the policy papers that that Cato produces might lead one to the mistaken, out of context, conclusion that you drew. I realize THIS article, and it's one line, by THIS author, on this ONE NARROW tax issue leads one to think that they think the flat tax is the ultimate solution they recommend.

For a more complete view, please visit their website, go to issues, taxes, and see ALL the articles and studies and possible solutions they offer there.

A consumption tax might be the number one recommendation. Thanks.

26 posted on 04/16/2004 7:32:49 AM PDT by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
It is a National Retail Sales Tax, but it has a rebate to make it progressive.

Where does the rebate money come from?

27 posted on 04/16/2004 7:44:27 AM PDT by lewislynn (Free traders know it isn't , they just believe cheap popcorn makers raises their living standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
Heard a fellow on the radio this morning that suggested 10 members of the US Congress be selected at random and forced to figure their own taxes.
Any Senator or Representative that made a mistake was to be immediately executed.

He guaranteed that the tax code would be simplified by next April 15th. Sounds like it would work to me.

Works for me too.
We just need a catchy name for it. I am serious!

THE ULTIMATE FAIR TAX

28 posted on 04/16/2004 7:46:19 AM PDT by Publius6961 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
Progressive?
Socialism, by any other name is still immoral stealing.

Progressive?
Progressive this!

You are free to give any excess that you choose to any one you want. And so am I. Why do we need the power of government to make it real?

29 posted on 04/16/2004 7:49:30 AM PDT by Publius6961 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
"I wonder (often) why a sales tax is great for cities and states, but is wrong for the federal government

Because the gross payment tax you're proposing/favor isn't a simple sales tax like a city would have...in fact because it isn't, you can't even be honest about the disclosure of what the rate is.

In other words the 23% tax you tout is really 30% in sales tax terms yet you avoid using the actual rate like the plague...Makes you wonder what else you're/they're lying about.

30 posted on 04/16/2004 7:51:50 AM PDT by lewislynn (Free traders know it isn't , they just believe cheap popcorn makers raises their living standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
I was on the IRS website the other day. I knew it was a tangled mess of Leviathan paperwork, but I had no idea how many forms, schedules, and pages of instruction the IRS publishes. It's truly shameful that we have such a complex system that has obviously been well-carved to cater to the friends of those in Congress.
31 posted on 04/16/2004 9:14:02 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
"What I find interesting as well as outrageous is that there is one very small statutory line that permits the govt to tax its citizenry." - LLT

Which line is that? (Do you mind posting it?)

Regards,

32 posted on 04/16/2004 9:26:14 AM PDT by Triple (All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Triple
I should have said "one sentence" vice "one line". See below:

Amendment XVI (1913)
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census of enumeration.
33 posted on 04/16/2004 10:22:28 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
Thanks.

I thought you had the statute tht congress passed, once it was provided the constitutoinal authority to do so in 1913.

If you have that ( the law that congressed passed, subsequent to that constitutional amendment, that requires the filing and payment of income taxes, that is what I'm looking for. (and I thought that is what you had given your 'statutory' reference)

Thanks anyway,

34 posted on 04/16/2004 10:50:16 AM PDT by Triple (All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Triple
Have you seen this? http://www.tax.org/Museum/default.htm

Maybe it can help you.
35 posted on 04/16/2004 11:01:14 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
"I realize THIS article, and it's one line, by THIS author, on this ONE NARROW tax issue leads one to think that they think the flat tax is the ultimate solution they recommend."

I received a very nice e-mail response today from the author stating similar sentiments. He said that he personally would be happy with either one and that there is a diversity of opinion among the organization's tax scholars.

However, he then said something that knocked my socks off. He said that the Hall-Rubushka Flat Tax was economically identical to a consumption tax. I want to write him back and diplomatically ask him how he figures that. The Flat Tax retains the corporate income and payroll taxes and therefore imbeds the cost of our system in goods produced here. For that reason, it would not address the handicap that the current tax system places US producers under. Also, I wonder how many pages the system would be if the Flat Tax were passed. As the current graph shows, it currently exceeds 54,000. I would bet that it would still exceed 45,000 under the Flat Tax. Assuming that compliance costs are roughly proportionate to the size and complexity of the Code, that means that compliance costs savings would be nominal, at least compared to the potential savings under the FairTax.

I may be missing something, but I don't consider the FairTax and the Flat Tax to be economically equivalent at all. Compliance cost savings and price shifts to make US production more price competitive in the US and around the world are probably the two biggest reasons that the FairTax would create enormous economic stimulus and the Flat Tax would appear to come up short in both areas.
36 posted on 04/16/2004 7:40:22 PM PDT by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
"Where does the rebate money come from?"

As if you didn't know. Go play your silly games somewhere else.
37 posted on 04/16/2004 7:45:31 PM PDT by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
"In other words the 23% tax you tout is really 30% in sales tax terms yet you avoid using the actual rate like the plague...Makes you wonder what else you're/they're lying about."

For the benefit of you other posters/lurkers on this thread, LewisLynn is a longtime basher of the FairTax who uses a number of other login IDs, including Balrog666, LiberalLarry and who knows how many others, to make it appear that the opposition to the FairTax is much greater than it is. He has denied using those tactics in the past.

I will let the other readers decide for themselves who the liar is.
38 posted on 04/16/2004 7:49:54 PM PDT by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson