Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum's Shame
National Review Online | 4/15/04 | Stephen Moore

Posted on 04/15/2004 5:30:21 PM PDT by Ogie Oglethorpe

April 15, 2004, 8:38 a.m. Santorum’s Shame Say it ain’t so, Rick.

No one can question Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum's free-market and pro-growth credentials. Santorum has been ranked as one of the most fiscally conservative Republicans in the Senate by groups like the National Taxpayers Union. He has led the fight for tax cuts and smaller government. And pro-growth contributors, for their part, did a lot of heavy lifting to help get Santorum into the Senate in the first place and into the leadership position he now holds. It was an investment that has paid off in spades.

That is why Santorum's recent interventions on behalf of Arlen Specter in the Pennsylvania Republican primary are so bewildering. Specter is now locked in a razor-tight race against conservative three-term congressman Pat Toomey. Toomey's voting record, especially on economic-growth issues, is very similar to Santorum's and is as impressive as Specter's is dreadful. Specter was one of only three Republicans who tried to eviscerate the Bush tax cut; he was the only Republican in the Senate to vote against the Washington, D.C. school-voucher bill; and he was ranked by the Citizens Against Government Waste as the "Pork Spender of the Year."

Specter often admits his left-wing tilt. Here is how he described his own political persuasion in a recent New Yorker article: "When I came to the Senate, we had a lot of members of the 'Wednesday Club' — a weekly gathering of Republican moderates. You had Lowell Weicker, you had Bob Stafford, you had Bob Packwood, you had Mark Hatfield, you had Lincoln Chafee, you had John Danforth, you had Jim Jeffords, you had John Heinz. Now there are only a few of us."

Specter freely admits that he shares the ideology of Jim Jeffords and Lowell Weicker.

Rick Santorum is obligated to publicly back the incumbent Specter. Santorum believes, probably rightly, that he would not be senator today without Specter's help. In a city where loyalty is notoriously a scarce commodity, Santorum can be commended for not his public pledges of support.

But Santorum is actively working to undermine Pat Toomey's candidacy. He has discouraged donors from contributing to Toomey. He has cut TV ads for Specter that portray the senior liberal senator as a friend of the taxpayer. He has staff people in Pennsylvania actively campaigning against Toomey.

Worst of all, Rick Santorum is running around Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C., perpetuating the myth that Pat Toomey is "too conservative to win in Pennsylvania." This is precisely what liberals said about Rick Santorum when he ran for the Senate back in 1994. Santorum proved that wrong. So did Ronald Reagan, when he won Pennsylvania with a fairly right-wing message in 1980 and 1984. Pennsylvania is the signature state of the Reagan Democrat voter. These are middle-class, often unionized, blue-collar voters who are pro-life, pro-gun, and anti-tax.

Pat Toomey has a demonstrated record of winning Reagan Democrat voters. Toomey represents Allentown, Pa. Allentown is the steel city that Billy Joel immortalized in song about an economically depressed area where out-of-work unionized steel workers are "filling in forms, standing in lines." Toomey wins the district where few other Republicans prevail. And he wins with a voting record that is for free trade, private accounts for Social Security, and lean budgets — with no pork. (In fact, Specter is running as the man who brings home the bacon, and attacks Toomey for his unwillingness to vote for budget busters that have caused the federal deficit to soar into the stratosphere.)

Despite this principled free-market position on issues and his unwillingness to chase pork spending, Toomey won the district even George Bush lost it in 2000.

This contention that Republican candidates lose when they position themselves to the right and when they run on pro-economic growth issues, rather than away from them, is plain wrong. When Republicans run on principles, they win. Santorum sounds like the Reagan skeptics of the 1970s: He's way too right wing to ever win the presidency. How many times does the conservative movement have to disprove this fallacy?

Pennsylvania is a key battleground state for President Bush. The Bush team and Santorum want Specter on the ticket. But our polls indicate that Specter on the ticket may very well hurt Bush in Pennsylvania, not help him. Toomey will turn out hundreds of thousands of conservative voters, whereas Specter will turn them away.

Santorum's attacks against the Toomey campaign are especially unwarranted because many of the thousands of people who have contributed to Toomey's campaign are the same donors who helped Santorum become a Senator himself. I have talked with many Club for Growth donors who are none too pleased that Santorum is now actively campaigning against the Toomey challenge to a RINO Republican. Needless to say, through his actions, Santorum is risking alienating his own donor base — which he will have to tap into two years from now as he seeks reelection.

Pat Toomey, as National Review put it so concisely on its cover a few weeks ago, is "the right choice." Rick Santorum, of all people, should recognize that. My worry is that if Santorum keeps up his open warfare against Pat Toomey, Pennsylvania may not only lose the chance to have two conservative senators, we may lose the chance to have any.

— Stephen Moore is president of the Club for Growth.


TOPICS: Editorial; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2004election; arlenspecter; cino; clubforgrowth; election2004; electionussenate; georgesoros; leftwingtilt; pa; pattoomey; penn; pennsylvania; republicanprimary; ricksantorum; rino; senatorricksantorum; senatorsantorum; soros; specter; stephenmoore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last
To: Ogie Oglethorpe; jwalsh07
"Rick will always have my vote. As disappointed as I am, I will never forget him standing up to the 'Beast on the Senate floor during the Partial-Birth Abortion ban. He was a true hero that day."


I agree, Santorum was a conservative hero on that day and many others, and even with my disappointment I still consider him one of our best possible presidential candidates in 2008. But remember that day that Santorum stood up to Hillary on partial-birth abortion? Arlen Specter voted in favor of a sham substitute amendment that would have allowed partial-birth abortions so long as the "doctor" said that the mother's health (including mental health) could be at risk if she gave birth. As everyone knew, the amendment was a poison pill and would not have banned a single abortion, but there was old RINO Arlen joining Tom Daschle and other pro-aborts trying to derail Senator Santorum's PBA ban. Of course, once the amendment was voted down (after Santorum's brilliant speech), and the PBA ban was certain to pass, Specter joined other pro-abortion hypocrites (such as Tom Daschle) to vote for final passage of the PBA ban.

And you know what? After Santorum cut those disgusting ads for Specter in which he says that Specter is with us on the votes that count, Specter backstabbed him again by voting in favor of Dianne Feinstein's sham substitute amendment to the Unborn Victims of Violence Act (Laci and Conner's Law), which amendment would have said that when a man shoots a pregnant woman and kills her and her baby, there was only one victim, and if he shoots her and kills the baby but the woman survives, he couldn't get charged with murder. That horrendous amendment was defeated by just a single vote, 50-49, but it wasn't Arlen's vote that saved the day, since he voted for the amendment (thank God that three pro-life Democrats, Zell Miller, Ben Nelson and John Breaux, voted the right way). But, of course, after Specter and his buddies failed to derail Laci and Conner's Law, Specter and Tom Daschle and some other hypocrites voted for final passage so that they could claim to have voted pro-life. Arlen Specter is lower than pondscum, pure and simple, and if his liberal record can be spun to say that he's with conservatives "when it counts," the same could be said about Tom Daschle's record. I hope and pray that Rick Santorum doesn't owe any "loyalty" to Tom Daschle and doesn't cut ads in favor of *that* liberal incumbent.
41 posted on 04/15/2004 6:43:48 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
Bork was many years ago. Arlen's older, he's almost infirm...did you see the debate?
42 posted on 04/15/2004 6:44:19 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Well, hopefully PA will elect a true conservative on April 27 and our conjecture will all be moot.
43 posted on 04/15/2004 6:46:09 PM PDT by Ogie Oglethorpe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ogie Oglethorpe
Specter sees taking over SJC and ensuring babykilling for another two decades as his final Senate legacy.

It'll happen because Specter is like that. Loyalty and principle are foreign concepts to him. Clearly, the guy is an albatross around the neck of conservatives.

44 posted on 04/15/2004 6:46:44 PM PDT by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000
>>Can someone verify Bush if pro-Spectre??

Yes. Both Bush and Santorum personally endorse Specter in his PA campaign ads. By endorsing him, both have shown they have no integrity.
45 posted on 04/15/2004 6:48:32 PM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ogie Oglethorpe
I hope so also..it looks very promising.
46 posted on 04/15/2004 6:48:56 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Bork was many years ago. Arlen's older, he's almost infirm...did you see the debate?

No, but I read FR posts that said Specter was more incoherent than Janet Reno.

Well, April 27th is a week and a half away. Guess I'll tune in to FR and see the results. I really do hope Toomey wins.

47 posted on 04/15/2004 6:49:45 PM PDT by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: PhilipFreneau
Yes. Both Bush and Santorum personally endorse Specter in his PA campaign ads. By endorsing him, both have shown they have no integrity.

Rick Santorum authored and got passed and signed the PBA Act of 2003. He has more integrity in his little toe than all his detractors have combined.

48 posted on 04/15/2004 6:54:51 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (REMEMBER FABRIZIO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
I hope and pray that Rick Santorum doesn't owe any "loyalty" to Tom Daschle and doesn't cut ads in favor of *that* liberal incumbent.

Direct your hope and prayers elsewhere, Santorum will not be cutting ads for Tom Daschle.

49 posted on 04/15/2004 6:55:56 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (REMEMBER FABRIZIO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Nice analysis. So, who'd you vote for in the primary?
50 posted on 04/15/2004 7:02:51 PM PDT by pettifogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pettifogger
I'm not in PA....
51 posted on 04/15/2004 7:10:50 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: Ogie Oglethorpe
Ain't nothing new with Santorum

He came out for that baby killer gun grabbing Greenwood in the Bucks County congressional primaries several years back
53 posted on 04/15/2004 7:28:58 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Good guess.I have never been disappointed in our Senator,Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum .
54 posted on 04/15/2004 7:31:36 PM PDT by fatima (My Granddaughter Karen is Home-WOOHOO We unite with all our troops and send our love-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
>> Rick Santorum authored and got passed and signed the PBA Act of 2003. He has more integrity in his little toe than all his detractors have combined.

I reside in PA, and I voted for Santorum, as did my wife. But, by definition, no one with integrity would endorse someone who has none. Spector has none. Those who endorse him have none.

55 posted on 04/15/2004 7:40:08 PM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: PhilipFreneau
You're smoking some Grade A crack if you think Santorum and Bush have no integrity.

I'm so sick of the whining, petty, so-called conservatives here who want every Republican to be a spitting image of one of the Founders. IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN, OK?

Now Santorum certainly is a conservative and committed to conservative causes. But it is a matter of policy that he and Bush support Specter. That doesn't mean they suddenly become left-wingers.

56 posted on 04/15/2004 7:44:31 PM PDT by BlkConserv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
We obviously have differing opinions on loyalty and debts. Nowhere to go from here.

My opinion on loyalty and debts is they are to be honored at all costs, until it comes to the harming of my true beliefs, my family, and the well being of my country. Repaying a political favor at the cost of detriment to the core-conservative cause of the party does nothing to further that cause, which I believed Santorum stood for. He's a young man, both in age and political position, and he's already playing the "scratch my back and I'll scratch yours". Politics as usual.

Perhaps my search for a stand-up conservative to finally enter the beltway and not play the usual paddycakes and footsies we all know so well will never end. It sure isn't ending here.

FReegards.

FMCDH

57 posted on 04/15/2004 7:49:03 PM PDT by nothingnew (The pendulum is swinging and the Rats are in the pit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
"However, I'll bet that Specter extorted this support from both Santorum and Bush in exchange for votes in support of major legislation--like the tax cuts, for instance."

You are exactly right. It is Specter's modus operandi, and he does it everytime he's up for relection. Hence, his defense of Clarence Thomas.

If I truly believed he would betray the conservative cause for loyalty to a colleague like Specter, I would never vote for him again.

58 posted on 04/15/2004 7:59:36 PM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH (A vote for president Bush IS a vote for principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
It isn't because Santorum owes Specter. Antoninus is exactly correct in post #12.
59 posted on 04/15/2004 8:02:46 PM PDT by TOUGH STOUGH (A vote for president Bush IS a vote for principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TOUGH STOUGH
Steve friend,We kill our friends met many at a meeting,it was a closed meeting.I stand by our Senator and I am proud of him, Antoninus is exactly correct in post #12.
60 posted on 04/15/2004 8:08:50 PM PDT by fatima (My Granddaughter Karen is Home-WOOHOO We unite with all our troops and send our love-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson