Factor Alert

4/15/04 | pookie18

[pookie18]

Was listening to Bill O'Reilly's Radio Factor. He did a story on the left-leaning groups behind some of the "9/11 families". He then interviewed Matthew Continetti who wrote the article (http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/854qqwpu.asp) leading to O'Reilly's investigation. My point, if I ever get to it, is that on tonight's O'Reilly Factor there'll be a segment on which will include discussions of groups such as Peaceful Tomorrows, The Tides Foundation, etc.

[onyx]

First off, "welcome to FR."

I am interested to know if O'Reilly
mentioned GORELICK during his radio show?

For a guy who claims he's "looking out for us"
he has been short on facts with regard to the
9-11 SHAM of a commission.

[EggsAckley]

Your question makes no sense.

But my question is, you signed up YESTERDAY and you've already posted at least ELEVEN vanity posts....????????

[pookie18]

Thanks. He may have in the first hour, but I only caught the last hour. I do know that he plans on ripping into Ben-Veniste during another segment on tonight's TV show.

[pookie18]

Since you sent your reply to several people, I'm not sure if you're addressing it to me. If so, did I ask a question & what are vanity posts?

[EggsAckley]

Oh yeah, I'm addressing you, newbie. Maybe I should'nt have used the word "question." Here are your very words:

My point, if I ever get to it, is that on tonight's O'Reilly Factor there'll be a segment on which will include discussions of groups such as Peaceful Tomorrows, The Tides Foundation, etc.

I still see no real "point" there. What IS your point? And why so many vanity posts? Haven't you read the forum rules, posted on the opening page?

[Tijeras_Slim]

Hi pookster... you're annoying Mr. Fang.

[isom35]

why did you choose "pookie18"? were there already 17 pookies ahead of you?

[EggsAckley]

For your edification, from the Posting Guidelines:

Do keep "vanity" posts to a minimum - Free Republic is primarily a place to discuss news, articles, and editorials. Vanity posts, creations of the poster him or herself, should meet a high standard of quality before one is even considered worthy of posting. Often a relevant current thread or general announcement, catch-all thread is a much better choice for a brief question or comment.

[John Lenin]

As obnoxious as big O can be I like what he is doing on exposing these families agenda.

[pookie18]

I was telling members about something that I'd heard because some people here should find it interesting. I couldn't post a transcript of O'Reilly's radio show because none exists. The link to the article that started O'Reilly's investigation didn't come out properly in my text...it should've been

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/854qqwpu.asp

My point is that there'll be a segment on tonight's O'Reilly Factor showing the left-leaning politization behind some of the 9/11 families who're getting the bulk of the airtime in the mainstream media. What else don't you understand?

[onyx]

Me too.
I'll break down and watch him tonight.
He'd better come thru for us. :)

[pookie18]

I tried Pookie, which was a cat of mine named after the lion puppet on the old Soupy Sales Show. The name was taken. Since she passed away at the age of 18...

[EggsAckley]

What else don't I understand? I don't understand why you think you are important enough to eat up bandwidth by posting vanity after vanity when the site clearly discourages that. It's a typical tactic of a disruptor/troll, and we've had LOTS of those lately. You are displaying several of the signs of a troll. Time will tell.

[upcountry miss]

Last night, I thought Bill did a great job of subtly jibing those on the commission who had an agenda, and then he accused some of the 9-11 widows of using the dead for political purposes. I felt it was more thought provoking than if he had named names. Most people knew he was accusing Gorelick, Ben-Veniste and that publicity-seeking Kristen (can't spell her last name).

[cwb]

Actually, Oreilly already had one of the 9/11 family members on his show last night. I think her name was Debbie Burlingame, and she said she was disgusted at how some other family members are politicizing the 9/11 attack and the commission.

She was at the Condi testimony and couldn't believe the "Roman Circus" atmosphere, as people heckled Condi and applauded their favorite Democrats. She admitted to being a Clinton/Gore supporter..and even being angry herself, but she now sees what these people are up to and supports Bush 100%.

Hopefully, Oreilly has his teeth into this one and will publicly expose both the fraud of these families...and the commission, itself. Interestingly "O" pointed out that none of these other so-called "victims" would agree to appear on Fox....kinda like Richard Clarke. I think were seeing a trend.

[pookie18]

Who the hell do you think you are? Troll, my ass. Go find a better way to spend your time.

[radiohead]

What else don't I understand?

Rude, in addition to using up bandwidth. Should be watched.

[onyx]

I had to walk away from the TV last night
when he permitted that male guest to babble
endlessly on when I wanted to hear from the
pilot's sister.

The male guest refused to acknowledge the obvious:
"the Jersey 4" are Bush-hating democrats on a mission
to destroy POTUS. I seriously doubt any of those
four women are actually "grieving" for their respective
deceased spouses.

[pookie18]

Saw that show. This one should be more of an expose...hopefully a good one. Today, he again reiterated that the Peaceful Tomorrows family members (numbering about 100) would no longer appear, but that they had no trouble appearing when he was helping them get their $$$. However, that was before they were locked up by some of the leftist groups which he says he'll be discussing tonight.