1 posted on
04/15/2004 1:20:47 PM PDT by
missyme
To: missyme
2 posted on
04/15/2004 1:23:09 PM PDT by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: missyme; shroudie; SwordofTruth
4 posted on
04/15/2004 1:35:14 PM PDT by
lonevoice
(Some things have to be believed to be seen)
To: missyme
Anyone who says that the Shroud is a painting is an idiot. It is impossible for anyone to paint a negative that, when reversed, looks anything like the Man on the Shroud. Anyone who seizes on that one carbon-dating result to claim that the Shroud is only 700-800 years old is ignoring a mountain of other evidence, both in the image, and in the cloth itself. I noted that John Dominic Crossan, the ex-priest TV-theologian, recently asserted that the Shroud was a medieval painting.
To: missyme
read later - pass to Dr Enger
To: missyme
bump
12 posted on
04/15/2004 2:55:08 PM PDT by
jonno
(We are NOT a democracy - though we are democratic. We ARE a constitutional republic.)
To: missyme
"...Jerusalem, where Christians believe Jesus was crucified. "
Don't non-Christians believe Jesus was crucified in Jerusalem? I don't believe the fact that Jesus of Nazareth lived and died by crucifixion is in dispute, as this statement implies.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
