Skip to comments.
9/11 Members defend donations (GORLICK TOP 'RAT DONOR !!!)
Newsday ^
| 15 April 2004
| THOMAS FRANK
Posted on 04/15/2004 12:21:26 PM PDT by 11th_VA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
This woman makes me ill ...
1
posted on
04/15/2004 12:21:28 PM PDT
by
11th_VA
To: 11th_VA
Proves my point that this 911 commission is a boondoggle of taxpayers $15 million. This farce is a politically-charged dog and pony show and should be disbanded. Bottom line: THEY THE BUSH ADMIN TO TAKE THE BLAME. The honest truth will never surface because they refuse to look at the clintoonian admin. Kill this commission.
2
posted on
04/15/2004 12:25:49 PM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: 11th_VA
she'll be yesterday's news soon ... disgraced... if that's possible of a liberal
3
posted on
04/15/2004 12:26:12 PM PDT
by
InvisibleChurch
(I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it)
To: 11th_VA
At least her fingerprints have turned up on who set 9-11 in motion.
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: 11th_VA
So, why does this story lead off with Republicans? Looks like just about all of the commission members donate to campaigns. So what? Most of them donated similar amounts except for one commission member whose donations were markedly higher than the others. That was the real story and should have been the lead-in line. More bias.
To: 11th_VA
This commission is at best a bad joke. The victims' families deserve much better.
7
posted on
04/15/2004 12:35:49 PM PDT
by
freedomcrusader
(Proudly wearing the politically incorrect label "crusader" since 1/29/2001)
To: 11th_VA
Hasn't everyone gotten the word that we're supposed to "stay out of their business"?
To: 11th_VA
bmp
10
posted on
04/15/2004 12:47:52 PM PDT
by
shield
(The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
To: Warlord David
I agree, kill the commission, with bullets preferable. The idea of discrediting the commission is borne of what should be a mainstream, sane, righteous principle; namely, that conflicts of interest and lack of integrity are necessary to the legitimate functioning of the committee.
Your fringe comment has the potential to relegate those of us who care about such things to the margins of the body politic simply by posting together with you on this board.
Rather than discredit the commission, you discredit this forum.
11
posted on
04/15/2004 12:55:21 PM PDT
by
Chunga
To: Diogenesis
That Democrat Homeland Security Advisory System is hilarious - I love it!
Qwinn
12
posted on
04/15/2004 1:01:48 PM PDT
by
Qwinn
To: 11th_VA
Anyone else notice something...interesting...here?
GORELICK, JAIME S
WASHINGTON,DC 20016
FANNIE MAE/VICE CHAIRMAN
9/21/2002
$250
Berkley, Shelley
GORELICK, JAMES S
CHEVY CHASE,MD 20815
FANNIE MAE
10/13/1999
$500
LaFalce, John J
GORELICK, JAMIE
CHEVY CHASE,MD 20815
WILMER CUTLER & PICKERING
10/28/2003
$250
Cantwell, Maria
13
posted on
04/15/2004 1:15:28 PM PDT
by
jcb8199
To: Qwinn; Diogenesis
That Democrat Homeland Security Advisory System is hilarious - I love it! There should be a couple of others in there. At the top...
Terrorists Have Just Attacked - Lob Cruise Missles
And in the middle...
Moderate Risk of Terrorist Attacks - Shake the Trees
14
posted on
04/15/2004 1:21:29 PM PDT
by
eggman
To: Chunga
"conflicts of interest and lack of integrity" should read "integrity and a lack of conflicts of interest."
15
posted on
04/15/2004 1:37:44 PM PDT
by
Chunga
To: jcb8199
We should be doing research using both spellings of her first name.
This could be interesting.
16
posted on
04/15/2004 1:40:22 PM PDT
by
mabelkitty
(John Kerry is the sad clown of life.)
To: Diogenesis
The Utterly Absolutely Disgraced 911 Commission [by their own choice] Great post!
We MUST flood the 9-11 Commission with our concerns. Ihave emailed then 4 times today. Let's all do it!!
info@9-11Commission.gov
17
posted on
04/15/2004 4:21:21 PM PDT
by
feedback doctor
(Freedom, God's gift to man, Clinton the devil's gift)
To: Chunga
" The idea of discrediting the commission is borne of what should be a mainstream, sane, righteous principle; namely, that conflicts of interest and lack of integrity are necessary to the legitimate functioning of the committee.
Your fringe comment has the potential to relegate those of us who care about such things to the margins of the body politic simply by posting together with you on this board.
Rather than discredit the commission, you discredit this forum."
probably late posting, that being said some dots, connect them, if I have posted in error feel free to whack the old guy. please make it simple
18
posted on
04/15/2004 5:16:37 PM PDT
by
dozer7
(Love many, trust few and always paddle your own canoe)
To: 11th_VA
Jamie Gorelick is a litigation partner of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering which represents Prince Mohammed al-Faisal al-Saud, the House of Saud, against a lawsuit filed by a coalition of 600 Sept. 11 families.
Do you think the 9/11 families attending the hearings would still be applauding Ms. Gorelick if they knew this little tidbit?
To: 11th_VA
Jamie Gorelick is a litigation partner of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering which represents Prince Mohammed al-Faisal al-Saud, the House of Saud, against a lawsuit filed by a coalition of 600 Sept. 11 families.
Do you think the 9/11 families attending the hearings would still be applauding Ms. Gorelick if they knew this little tidbit?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson