Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REP SENSENBRENNER CALLS FOR GORELICK TO RESIGN
NRO -The Corner ^ | 4/14/04 | REP SENSENBRENNER

Posted on 04/14/2004 3:14:55 PM PDT by swilhelm73

Sensenbrenner Urges Commissioner Gorelick to Resign from the 9/11 Commission Because of Her Conflict of Interest

WASHINGTON, D.C. - House Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. (R-Wis.) released the following statement:

"Yesterday, a 1995 memo written by 9/11 Commission Member Jamie Gorelick, in her former role as the second in command at the Justice Department, revealed her actions in establishing the heightened 'wall' prohibiting the sharing of intelligence information and criminal information. Scrutiny of this policy lies at the heart of the Commission's work. Ms. Gorelick has an inherent conflict of interest as the author of this memo and as a government official at the center of the events in questions. Thus, I believe the Commission's work and independence will be fatally damaged by the continued participation of Ms. Gorelick as a Commissioner. Reluctantly, I have come to the conclusion that Ms. Gorelick should resign from this Commission.

"The Commission's Guidelines on Recusals state, 'Commissioners and staff will recuse themselves from investigating work they performed in prior government service.' Commissioner Gorelick's memo directing a policy that 'go[es] beyond what is legally required' indicates that her judgment and actions as the Deputy Attorney General in the Reno Justice Department are very much in question before the Commission. Indeed Attorney General Ashcroft called this DOJ policy, 'the single greatest structural cause for September 11 ... [and] embraced flawed legal reasoning.' Commissioner Gorelick is in the unfair position of trying to address the key issue before the Commission when her own actions are central to the events at issue. The public cannot help but ask legitimate questions about her motives.

"While it is regrettable that this conflict had not come to light sooner, this Commission's work and forthcoming recommendations are too important to be questioned in this way, and may be devalued by Ms. Gorelick's continued participation as a Commissioner. Given Ms. Gorelick's work as the Deputy Attorney General under Janet Reno, Ms. Gorelick can be quite valuable to the Commission's work preparing 'a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.' However, that contribution should come as a witness before the Commission - not as a member.

"Key figures like former FBI Director Freeh, Director Mueller, Attorney General Ashcroft, former presidential adviser Richard Clarke, and National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice have all testified before the Commission and would have rightly sparked indignation about a conflict of interest had these individuals also been members of the Commission. Testifying before the Commission is Ms. Gorelick's proper role, not sitting as a member of this independent commission."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; gorelick; sensenbrenner

1 posted on 04/14/2004 3:14:55 PM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
any commission that has even one Clinton person(this has two) is absolutely noncredible.
2 posted on 04/14/2004 3:16:22 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
Sensenbrenner up on Brit Hume, next.
3 posted on 04/14/2004 3:19:15 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
Sorta like letting the accused murderer get to vote with jury.
She should be answering questions, not asking them.
4 posted on 04/14/2004 3:19:29 PM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60
Brit Hume was just talking about it and has Rep Sensenbrenner life on
5 posted on 04/14/2004 3:23:43 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
POSTED HERE 200+posts


http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1117538/posts
6 posted on 04/14/2004 3:25:36 PM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
"Commissioner Gorelick is in the unfair position of trying to address the key issue before the Commission when her own actions are central to the events at issue."

Yeah, but that Clinton bunch has been so used to getting free passes from the media for so long, that they are absolutely arrogant about having to actually account for their actions.

7 posted on 04/14/2004 3:32:05 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
Is the 'wag the dog' crowd serious enough about improving the US anti-terrorism capability to call for Gorelick's recusal and subsequent testimony to the 9/11 Commission?

Sometimes I just kill with my sarcastic rhetorical questions.

8 posted on 04/14/2004 3:38:46 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties
Sometimes I just kill with my sarcastic rhetorical questions.

Since you brought up the matter , I wonder if Gore-lick should consider seppuko?

9 posted on 04/14/2004 3:53:30 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
Commission Member Jamie Gorelick, in her former role as the second in command at the Justice Department, revealed her actions

She revealed? She revealed nothing. Ashecroft fingered her and she confessed. She doesn't get credit for coming forth. If it weren't for Ashecroft she would be sitting mum on the committee.

10 posted on 04/14/2004 6:41:01 PM PDT by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jemian
Kean insisted that she had recused herself where necessary. Since her actions were largely responsible for 9/11, how could she have been allowed to sit on any of the proceedings to determine what had happened?
11 posted on 04/14/2004 6:44:28 PM PDT by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson