Skip to comments.
Will Limbaugh now allow Toomey equal time on his show?
radio
| 4/14/04
| eUS
Posted on 04/14/2004 11:18:51 AM PDT by Skyleader
Now that Rush has given Specter a 15 minute nationwide forum, will he offer Toomey equal time on his program? Where were the hard-ball question from Rush?
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: limbaugh; specter; toomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
1
posted on
04/14/2004 11:18:52 AM PDT
by
Skyleader
To: Skyleader
Rush did have his kid gloves on for sure.
2
posted on
04/14/2004 11:20:54 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
Sooooo funny!!!
Rush let Spectre deny deny any connection to Soros, for what? 5 minutes? Then, in his last sentence, Spectre sort of threw in, well way back before Soros became so anti Bush, he did donate $1,000.00 to me.
Did you catch it?
3
posted on
04/14/2004 11:28:51 AM PDT
by
YaYa123
( @Scottish Lawyers Lie Too.com)
To: Skyleader
If Toomey calls, I'm sure Rush will have him on. Rush won't call Toomey for rebuttal.
IMHO, Rush wimped out in the interview.
4
posted on
04/14/2004 11:29:20 AM PDT
by
hattend
(Give a monthly FR donation so we can end the stupid fundraisers - I'm at $40 per mo)
To: Skyleader
I bet that he will.
And I bet that, IN SPECTER'S ABSENCE, Rush will come off all hardcore.
He always is, face to face (or mouth to ear). Big disappointment; can't think of one exception.
Big talker -- but just that. A talker. And not confrontationally.
Dan
5
posted on
04/14/2004 11:32:14 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: YaYa123
Did you catch it? Yep, he's out.
6
posted on
04/14/2004 11:42:27 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: BibChr
And not confrontationally. One can be direct and probing without being confrontational ... and I suspect Rush knows that. I think either he's awed by power, or he puts on kid gloves so he can get other RINO guests in the future.
To: The kings dead
As an early listener, I wished that Rush would go toe to toe with The Nameless One. He was so terrific on him, he helped me keep my sanity during The Nameless One's reign of dissolute idiocy.
But then as I got to "know" Rush better, I actually came to hope he wouldn't. I knew he'd cave, he'd kiss up, he'd go soft. I think (being charitable) that part of it is his upbringing. To Rush, it just wouldn't be "classy."
But part is that he's all talk, no guts.
Dan
8
posted on
04/14/2004 11:59:58 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Skyleader
He'd better.
My thought as well.
9
posted on
04/14/2004 12:02:26 PM PDT
by
fishtank
To: BibChr
But then as I got to "know" Rush better, I actually came to hope he wouldn't. I knew he'd cave, he'd kiss up, he'd go soft. I think (being charitable) that part of it is his upbringing. To Rush, it just wouldn't be "classy." I think President Bush has a similar attitude, except that, unlike Rush, he goes "soft" on the media and Democrats who hate him.
10
posted on
04/14/2004 12:03:51 PM PDT
by
k2blader
(Some folks should worry less about how conservatives vote and more about how to advance conservatism)
To: Skyleader
I was waiting for Rush to ask "if Soros wanted to give you money directly, would you take it?"
Frankly, if some Soros wants Specter, we need Toomey to win.
11
posted on
04/14/2004 12:03:55 PM PDT
by
Vision
(Always Faithful)
To: Vision
Again...Frankly, if Soros wants Specter in, we need Toomey to win
12
posted on
04/14/2004 12:05:31 PM PDT
by
Vision
(Always Faithful)
To: BibChr
Rush didn't need to say ANYTHING. Why say something when Arlen was going to hang himself with his own rope.
13
posted on
04/14/2004 2:38:45 PM PDT
by
jbstrick
(War is not fought for peace. War is fought for victory.)
To: jbstrick
I think I get your point, but here's my honest answer.
How many times have you done as I have -- listened to Rush raking the press and interviewers over the coals for what they SHOULD have asked? How many times have you said (as I have), "Yeah! THAT's the right question! Dang, I wish Rush had been there instead of (Katie, Peter, Matt, Chris, whoever)!"
So now, there he is. He has the chance. He could say to Specter what you or I would say to him. He could say, "Senator, how can you really expect the support of your party when you never express regret for Borking Bork, under our greatest President, ever? How can you inspire loyalty, when you've only done one decent thing body-slammed Anita Hill and then APOLOGIZED for it? Senator...?"
See my point? He had the chance. Evidently, he failed.
And YOU and I will NEVER have that chance.
Dan
14
posted on
04/14/2004 2:43:08 PM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
Dan.
I agree...
15
posted on
04/14/2004 2:55:17 PM PDT
by
jbstrick
(War is not fought for peace. War is fought for victory.)
To: BibChr
Please answer your ping.
"We" have been taken to task on another thread!
LOL-LOL-LOL
Can't criticize Rush you know?
16
posted on
04/14/2004 2:57:37 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold)
To: Skyleader
Why? Is Soros claiming to work for Toomey now?
To: BibChr
Well, to be fair, it would have been petty of Rush to bring up decades-old stuff. "Scottish law" should have been brought up, though.
To: hattend
I hope so. It sounded like Rush was backing Specter.
19
posted on
04/14/2004 3:05:06 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
(Arlen Specter supports the International Crime Court having jurisdiction over US soldiers)
To: YaYa123
well way back before Soros became so anti Bush, he did donate $1,000.00 to me . . .Did you catch it? Yup. Soros has been supporting him since 1996. Both are one-worlders.
20
posted on
04/14/2004 3:06:07 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
(Arlen Specter supports the International Crime Court having jurisdiction over US soldiers)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson