Replies

I think I get your point, but here's my honest answer.

How many times have you done as I have -- listened to Rush raking the press and interviewers over the coals for what they SHOULD have asked? How many times have you said (as I have), "Yeah! THAT's the right question! Dang, I wish Rush had been there instead of (Katie, Peter, Matt, Chris, whoever)!"

So now, there he is. He has the chance. He could say to Specter what you or I would say to him. He could say, "Senator, how can you really expect the support of your party when you never express regret for Borking Bork, under our greatest President, ever? How can you inspire loyalty, when you've only done one decent thing — body-slammed Anita Hill — and then APOLOGIZED for it? Senator...?"

See my point? He had the chance. Evidently, he failed.

And YOU and I will NEVER have that chance.

Dan

14 posted on 04/14/2004 2:43:08 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])

15 posted on 04/14/2004 2:55:17 PM PDT by jbstrick (War is not fought for peace. War is fought for victory.)

Please answer your ping.
"We" have been taken to task on another thread!
LOL-LOL-LOL
Can't criticize Rush you know?

16 posted on 04/14/2004 2:57:37 PM PDT by onyx (Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold)

Well, to be fair, it would have been petty of Rush to bring up decades-old stuff. "Scottish law" should have been brought up, though.

18 posted on 04/14/2004 3:04:49 PM PDT by AmishDude

Exactly

Rush was pathetic

He is as bad as the reporters throwing softballs at Clinton

31 posted on 04/14/2004 4:02:13 PM PDT by uncbob

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794