Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi Blogger: Situation "Spiralling out of Control"

Posted on 04/11/2004 3:13:25 PM PDT by Filibuster_60

A whole year has passed now and I can't help but feel that we are back at the starting point again. The sense of an impending disaster, the ominous silence, the breakdown of most governmental facilities, the absence of any police or security forces, contradicting news reports, rumours everywhere, and a complete disruption in the flow of everyday life chores. All signs indicate that it's all spiralling out of control, and any statements by CPA and US officials suggesting otherwise are blatantly absurd.

The chaos and unrest have rapidly spread to several other cities in Iraq such as Mosul, Ba'quba, and Kirkuk. The situation in Fallujah looks terrible and bleak enough from what Al-Jazeera is showing every hour. Ahmad Mansour reported that they keep changing their location for fear of being targetted by Americans. The town stadium has turned into one large graveyard, and the death toll is 500 Iraqis until now with over a thousand injured, a huge price to pay for 'pacification'. The insurgents in Fallujah who are using mosques and house roofs to wage their war against the Marines are equally to blame for the blood of the civilians who have been caught in the crossfire. A ceasefire has been announced by the Americans and is supposed to be in effect but Al-Jazeera reports that fighting continues. What kills me is the absence of any serious effort by Iraqi parties, organisations, tribal leaders, or clerics to intermediate or try to put an end to the cycle of violence. All we hear is denunciation and fiery speeches as if those were going to achieve anything on the ground.

An anonymous group announced that it held 30 foreign hostages today according to Al-Iraqiya tv. Two Germans were also kidnapped recently, as well as an Italian. There have been rumours on the Internet that the three Japanese hostages faked the video that was displayed two days ago with the help of Iraqis in an attempt to pressure the Japanese government in withdrawing their troops. All three of them are anti-war activists. Noriaki Imai was in Iraq researching the effect of Depleted Uranium on Iraqis. Nahoka Takato works with an NGO helping Iraqi children orphaned from the war, and Soichiru Koriyama is a freelance journalist who has been in the Palestinian occupied territories recently. I find it hard to believe they would go this far. The fear and horror in their eyes was very evident in the video, if it is a hoax then they certainly have a promising future in Hollywood. I also received an incredible number of emails and appeals from Japanese citizens and organizations asking me to spare the lives of the Japanese hostages (do they think I have something to do with the kidnapping??) and to tell the 'mujahideen' that the hostages were all against the war (as if that would make any difference to the kidnappers).

In Karbala, a Mahdi Army figure announced yesterday that they have suspended all operations in the holy city until the Shia Arba'ieniya ceremonies are over. Preparations for the event have not been interrupted by the situation in the country, and Shia pilgrims continue to pour into Karbala, which is totally under control of Al-Mahdi. The spokesman congratulated Zainab bint Ali (Imam Hussein's sister) for the 'liberation' of her brother's city in his speech. Any terrorist attacks against the visiting Shi'ites in the next 24 hours would most probably plunge the country into a disaster. And I can't see how Al-Mahdi are going to prevent attacks if any local or foreign powers decide to. A new popular hossa (tribal battle cry) amongst Mahdi militiamen is 'Fallujah wa Al-Kufa, hatha alwatan men'ufa' (Fallujah and Kufa, this country we will not abandon). Some Iraqis have been circulating another controversial hossa being used by Mahdi "Excuse us Imam Ali, but Muqtada is our weli". This slogan is considered very insulting and offensive to the majority of Shia, since in their doctrine only Imam Ali (Muhammed's cousin and son-in-law) is considered to be their weli or guardian. There has also been talk about Muqtada being referred to as Al-Mahdi (Shi'ite twelfth lost Imam and Messiah), but Shia regard that as an outrageous allegation.

As to Al-Sadr's relation with Iran, I would think it highly improbable that he is an Iranian puppet, although his ties to the Grand Ayatollah Kadhum Al-Ha'eri (Iraqi exiled cleric in Iran) are well known (Muqtada himself confessed once some time ago that he was Al-Ha'eri's agent in Iraq which was the main reason he gathered such a following as well as his father's reverence by Iraqi Shia). I admit that is highly possible that he has recieved financial support from Iran but not to the extent as to work in behalf of them in Iraq. There are rumours of existing training camps for Al-Mahdi volunteers in Iran along the Iraqi border, but I think it is very improbable that the Iranian regime would be so open in their support for the dissenting cleric. However, it is also hard to believe that a young and inexperienced cleric with no real popular support from the Hawza would succeed in recruiting, financing, and training an army of 10,000 Shi'ites, as well as setting up offices, newspapers, and a huge propaganda machine all by himself. All of his aides and supporters are young and impoverished, a large number of them are known to people as criminals, thieves, looters, and unemployed illiterate slum dwellers. They would never show such dedication to their cause unless they were being rewarded. And any one who suggests that they rebelled for nationalist reasons can never be more far from reality. This is NOT a Shia rebellion or Intifada. The only case where a Shia uprising would take place is if the Grand Ayatollah Ali Taqi Al-Sistani issues a fatwah to that effect, along with the support of the other three leading Shi'ite clerics (Ayatollah Mohammed Sa'eed Al-Hakim, Ayatollah Bashir Al-Najafi, and Ayatollah Mohammed Ishaq Al-Fayyadh) who constitute the Hawza alilmiyyah of Najaf. And Sistani might lose patience any moment and do so considering the deteriorating situation. An agent of Sistani was quoted once saying "We receive so many requests each day from Iraqis asking us to issue a fatwa for Jihad against the Americans. We say no, but this No will not be forever".

It is becoming increasingly evident from all the violence we have witnessed over the last year, that a proxy war is being waged against the US on Iraqi soil by several countries and powers with Iraqis as the fuel and the fire, just like Lebanon was during the late seventies and eighties. The majority of Arab regimes have a huge interest in this situation continuing, not to mention Iran, and Al-Qaeda. I am not trying, of course, to lift the blame from Iraqis, because if Iraqis were not so divided the way they are, these powers would have never succeeded. I never thought that Iraqis would be so self-destructive, I thought that they had enough of that. But with each new day I am more and more convinced that we need our own civil war to sort it all out. It might take another 5, 10, or even 20 years, and hundreds of thousands more dead Iraqis but I believe it would be inevitable. Yugoslavia, South Africa, Lebanon, Algiers, and Sudan did not achieve the relative peace and stability they now enjoy if it weren't for their long years of civil war. If the 'resistance' succeeded and 'liberated' Iraq, the country would immediately be torn into 3, 4, 5 or more parts with each faction, militia, or army struggling to control Baghdad, Kirkuk, Najaf, Karbala, and the oil fields. It will not be a sectarian war as many would imagine, it would be a war between militias. We already have up to 5 official militias, not to mention the various religious groups and armies.

It is the most foolish and selfish thing to say "pull the troops out", or "replace them with the UN or NATO". Someone has to see us through this mess to the end. Only a deluded utopian (or an idiot peace activist) would believe that Iraqis would all cosily sit down and settle down their endless disputes without AK-47's, RPG's, or mortars in the event of coalition troops abandoning Iraq. Please please don't get me wrong, I am not in the least saying that I enjoy being occupied by a foreign force, I am not a dreamer who believes that the USA is here for altruistic reasons, I am not saying that I am happy with what my bleeding country is going through, believe me when I say it tears my heart every day to witness all the bloodshed, it pains me immensely to see that we have no leaders whomsoever with the interest and well-being of Iraq as their primary goal, it kills me to see how blind and ignorant we have all become. Iraqis are dying inside every day, and we are committing suicide over and over and over. Some people call me a traitor or a collaborator for all the above and for speaking the truth as opposed to rhetorical, fiery speeches which have been our downfall.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Hoosier-Daddy
There must be some pork products in those MRE's. Surely thats one thing that hasn't be declared contraband.
21 posted on 04/11/2004 3:41:53 PM PDT by oyez (Fortune favors the bold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy
Eqaully - Give him credit. Just saying equally shows that reason is trying to come through with this blogger. You would expect him to think the Marines are completely at fault. That he gives this much consideration shows promise.
22 posted on 04/11/2004 3:42:48 PM PDT by bluefish (Disclaimer for Pukin: I do not believe Freepers should die for arguing with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
Why do you say that blogs don't belong here? I've posted from them before, and I think that they impart necessary information that often cannot be found anywhere else.
23 posted on 04/11/2004 3:45:16 PM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
To call these savages Huns would be an insult to the Huns.
24 posted on 04/11/2004 3:46:46 PM PDT by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Beautiful post, 68skylark. You should consider posting it as a vanity posting on its own thread.
25 posted on 04/11/2004 3:48:14 PM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
Ending the ceasefire in Fallujah would be a good idea, no?
26 posted on 04/11/2004 3:54:26 PM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
The Iraqis won't fight for their freedom - the past week has shown that.
27 posted on 04/11/2004 3:55:11 PM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
As the liberal media in this country increases it's attack on our President there will be a corresponding increase in the attacks on our troops in Iraq.

The time to make those responsible aware of the consequences of their actions is now, before any more troops are attacked.

28 posted on 04/11/2004 3:56:12 PM PDT by fightu4it (conquest by immigration and subversion spells the end of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy
The death toll is 500 Iraqis until now with over a thousand injured, a huge price to pay for 'pacification'

We killed 100 000+ in Tokyo, and most of them weren't fighting.

If I was in charge, Fallujah would be gone and everyone in it would be dead.

As the days go by, it seems increasingly likely to me that this would have been the correct thing to do.

29 posted on 04/11/2004 4:01:51 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
The Iraqis won't fight for their freedom - the past week has shown that.

Would you please stop this nonsense about "Iraqi freedom"?

There is no such place as "Iraq". There are three former Turkish provinces (Mosul, Mesopotamia, Basrah) which have no connection to each other and which contain people who are mortal enemies.

If the inhabitants of what you call "Iraq" were free, the first thing that would happen is that they would dissolve "Iraq", and then they would go to war with each other.

As long as there is a place called "Iraq", the people who live in it are by definition not free.

30 posted on 04/11/2004 4:06:39 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Agreed. Stop bashing me and start bashing Bush - he's the one who continues to uphold these illusions.
31 posted on 04/11/2004 4:09:09 PM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
The Iraqis won't fight for their freedom - the past week has shown that.

Well I don't want to overstress the analogy to America, since I realize that Iraqi culture is different than ours.

But in all fairness to them, there were multiple times when the good guys in our revolution were beaten back, scattered and and sent running at full speed. The British were congratulating themselves on their victories. And any of our allies would be justified to say, "The Americans won't fight for their freedom - the past week has shown that."

All I want to say is that these conflicts of freedom vs. tyranny can take many years and decades. We won't know for a long time how Iraq will turn out. And I think it could go either way.

Along the way there will be good days and bad days, and plenty of people will make the most of the bad days. But I think most Americans know to keep an eye on the long term -- most Americans are pretty level-headed about this sort of thing, and same same goes for key allies like the UK.

32 posted on 04/11/2004 4:11:37 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
When the statue fell, the media was talking about the huge mess that Mosul was in. Mosul was going to be the center of resistance. Mosul was in chaos. Mosul was a hotbed of anti-American activity.

And then, for a full year, Mosul as completely quiet.

You'll excuse me if I take this report with an equally small helping of salt.

Qwinn
33 posted on 04/11/2004 4:15:30 PM PDT by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Bump!
34 posted on 04/11/2004 4:16:38 PM PDT by VMI70 (...but two Wrights made an airplane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
I believe that what helped us after WWII with the pacification of the Axis powers was the utter destruction we brought upon their countries. In Iraq, we took over with minimum civilian casualties. While I deplore killing, the Iraqis have not felt the full weight of our military might, and were not 'defeated'. Realizing that that was never our intentions, we are occupying surrounded by undefeated enemies. We are in effect killing ourselves with kindness.
35 posted on 04/11/2004 4:17:06 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy (It's a fight to the death with Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Want to know what Iraqis think?
36 posted on 04/11/2004 4:18:07 PM PDT by Reagan Man (The choice is clear. Reelect BUSH-CHENEY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
Y-A-W-N!!!
37 posted on 04/11/2004 4:18:54 PM PDT by wingster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Has the sky hit the ground yet...?
38 posted on 04/11/2004 4:19:10 PM PDT by wingster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
I'd stop deluding myself if I were you. Remember, war is the continuation of politics by other means. Can anyone doubt that we could've flattened Fallujah a long time ago and completely wiped out the insurgency? But our goals in Iraq - as in Vietnam before - are more political than military. There can be no pure military solutions to political problems - unless we eliminate those political problems by simply slaughtering every single Iraqi. The reason we didn't raze Fallujah is it would've put us on a slippery slope, where we'd soon find that other towns also have to be razed. Before long we'd face a full oil embargo from Arab countries, at the very least. What then? The slippery slope guarantees nothing but an ever-expanding list of enemies. Reviving the draft is the logical next step. . . we can go on and on.
39 posted on 04/11/2004 4:20:07 PM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60; dennisw; SJackson; Salem; TrueBeliever9; NRA2BFree

"What kills me is the absence of any serious effort by Iraqi parties, organisations, tribal leaders, or clerics to intermediate or try to put an end to the cycle of violence. All we hear is denunciation and fiery speeches as if those were going to achieve anything on the ground."

No surprises here - they are just taking their cue and following the examples of the Americans.

The American MUSLIMS that is.

Is C.A.I.R. rebuking this Islamic Jihad? - ping.

40 posted on 04/11/2004 4:23:38 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson